similar to: Server-side mail archiving - possible dovecot lda feature?

Am 12.06.2020 um 02:03 schrieb Ralph Seichter: > * Andreas Born: > >> There exists one problem: at this stage of mail reception you have no >> body content nor header information on which a milter may perform >> deeper analysis, only envelope data. > > I am not sure what you mean by "this stage of mail reception", or what I meant the different stages when

Hi Timo, There was another thread (it has come up at least a few times in the past few years I've been lurking) on the postfix list about having some kind of automatic 'Save to Sent' option to avoid the users mail client from having to upload messages twice (obviously the only ones of concern are ones with large attachments) - once to send it, and once to save the copy in the sent

Hello all, I've been trying to get spamassassin and clamav working, but got really confused when I realized there are various incarnations of the software. Originally, I started out with just spamassassin, but learned there is also an SA-milter. Can someone tell me which of the various spam fighting packages i.e., sa, sa-milter, clamav, clamave-milter, and so forth? I ran into

Am 26.01.2015 um 10:52 schrieb St?phane Cottin: >> Le 26 janv. 2015 ? 10:09, Reindl Harald <h.reindl at thelounge.net> a ?crit : >>>> You're stilling going to lose contents. If dspam fails, the mail >>>> is dumped, the LDA returns exit code 75, and the MTA will probably >>>> issue a bounce Email to the sender. >>> >>> which

Am 26.01.2015 um 08:52 schrieb Steffen Kaiser: > On Sun, 25 Jan 2015, Joseph Tam wrote: >> St?phane Cottin writes: > >>> dspam already send errors to syslog, the point here is to never loose >>> email contents. This was a wrong design, i'm now use a wrapper instead >>> ( see my previous post for details ). > >> You're stilling going to lose

Once upon a time, Kenneth Porter <shiva at sewingwitch.com> said: > Perfect. I think the only other significant customizations I have > are lines to use the MIMEDefang and OpenDKIM milters. When last I > looked into migrating, I recall that Postfix handled milters just > fine. Milters work a little different under postfix IIRC... I haven't tried them (which is a little sad,

I was getting these errors below and after fixing it delivery errors were introduced dovecot/error_log ============== dovecot: Jul 11 06:19:28 Error: auth-worker(default): sql(user at domain.com): User query failed: Table 'postfix.users' doesn't exist deliver(user at domain.com): Jul 11 06:19:28 Error: BUG: Unexpected input from auth master: FAIL 1 dovecot: Jul 11 06:21:41 Error:

I am sick of this gmail spam. Does anyone know a solution where I can do something like this: 1. received email from adcpni444 at gmail.com 2. system recognizes this email address has been 'whitelisted', continue with 7. 3. system recognizes as this email never been seen before 4. auto reply with something like (maybe with a wait time of x hours): Your message did not receive the

Is there any reason not to make (for v1.2) 1) deliver -e behavior the defaut? 2) not even provide the option for the current default (have deliver send bounces itself)? The only reason it even works like it does currently is because I just mostly copied what Cyrus did.

Strangest thing. Since some time Marts 25. I'm no longer receiving mails from the dovecot mailing list server. Mails from other sources are behaving fine. Instead I'm just seing Mar 26 08:27:54 dna01 postfix/smtpd[107746]: Anonymous TLS connection established from talvi.dovecot.org[94.237.25.159]: TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits) Mar 26 08:27:54 dna01

I've been running sendmail since the beginning of my online time. 1. Did I see that postfix can run sendmail milters? 2. If so, did I read that postfix can run these separately for inbound vs. outbound? 3. Can it run like a rbl blacklist on inbound and not outbound? 4. If the above is true, does this require separate configurations of postfix or is it already set to allow this out of the

On a 4.8-RELEASE-p17 machine running Sendmail 8.12.8p2 we are seeing the following errors in /var/log/{messages,maillog}: sm-mta[50018]: i3TDTBcR050018: SYSERR(root): out of memory: Cannot allocate memory I will include more info as we can gather it. --- Nick Golder

Am 11.06.2020 um 19:15 schrieb Ralph Seichter: > Generating backscatter is definitely not a good move, and it is even > prone to punish yourself. Better to reject the offending message with > a 5xx status code and some explanatory text or the URL. > > The various tests required to come to a decision about accepting or > rejecting the message can be executed in a milter.

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 On Mon, 24 Feb 2014, Charles Marcus wrote: > On 2/24/2014 3:58 AM, Steffen Kaiser <skdovecot at smail.inf.fh-brs.de> wrote: >> I would add a BCC recipient in the MTA. It's more save in such situation. >> See the thread about qmail and multiple recipients for one mail address. > > The only downside to this is all of

Hi Stephan, many thanks for all the work you do on the new sieve parts to dovecot. As a (downstream) packager I have some questions: a) pigeonhole is called a working title - will the final release be called something else like dovecot-sieve again? b) The versioning seems to go from 0.1.15 to 0.1.13. From a packager's POV it would be better to allow a natural version upgrade path.

Hi, I'm currently busy with a substiution of my current mail server. I'm currently using * Clam-SMTP and * SpamAssassin to fight Spam. I wonder if it is worth implementing AmaViS with SpamAssassin backend instead and also using AmaViS to speak to clamd directly. But I more and more wonder wether AmaViS is even worth it?! It currently looks to me as if AmaViS is eating LOTS of

Once upon a time, Kenneth Porter <shiva at sewingwitch.com> said: > How would you implement the section here titled "Sendmail > workaround" using Postfix? http://www.postfix.org/postconf.5.html#recipient_delimiter -- Chris Adams <linux at cmadams.net>

Okay, Yahoo is bumming me. Only system my mail is having an issue with. All mail is accepted, but junked. I can only think it is the DKIM/Domain keys. It is apparent that the dkim-milter is not part of the centos 5.x distro nor is it part of the mirrors, as far as I can tell. So...have any of you done it with your servers for sendmail? There are some sites that claim to have rpms and I have

Sep 5 19:59:21 domain postfix/qmgr[19936]: warning: connect to transport private/spamassassin: Connection refused Pol On 2017-09-05 03:10, Bill Shirley wrote: > Try main.cf: > # dovecot 2.x > mailbox_command = /usr/bin/spamc -e /usr/libexec/dovecot/dovecot-lda > -a "$RECIPIENT" -f "$SENDER" -m "$EXTENSION" > > Bill > > > On 9/3/2017

Hi Dovecot People, i have switched my system from courier-imap to dovecot and iam quite happy with it, the performance is well and i had nearly no problems. One little feature iam missing is in Courier i had a folder called "Outbox" there i could paste mails which i want to sent out. In some networks its not always available to sent mails via port 21, i know i could just set up my