Displaying 20 results from an estimated 4000 matches similar to: "MBox path"
2005 Aug 02
1
Default_mail_env..
Hi,
I 'm new to Dovecot and we are trying to do some tests in a
production environment. We use mysql to authenticate and dovecot imap
only. But our structure directory is something special.
All of ours accounts are stored in maildir and the path is the
following:
For example the account pepe at inter.net
/export/maildir/inter.net/p/e/pepe and into pepe we have
2006 May 27
2
Effect of "login_process_per_connection = no"?
Using dovecot version v1.0.beta8 on FreeBSD 6.1_RELEASE with
login_process_per_connection = no
in the dovecot.conf file, I still get a new imap process for each IMAP
login. That is, if a single user logs in five times, five imap
processes are created.
The difference appears to be that with a "yes" setting each user login
causes a new copy of the imap-login processes to be forked,
2005 Apr 26
1
Basic configuration problem "not a directory"
Hi,
I've been struggling with getting dovecot up and running the last hour,
but I seem to be stuck.
When logging in (which I can do successfully) my connection is dropped,
and the following is outputted to my dovecot log:
dovecot: Apr 26 09:56:52 Fatal: chdir(/bin/false) failed with uid 513:
Not a directory
dovecot: Apr 26 09:56:52 Error: child 27345 (imap) returned error 89
.. But
2006 Oct 10
1
RC8 failing...
I just tried upgrading from RC7 to RC8 this morning, and I'm seeing
an issue I've never seen before. On my first POP3 login, all is fine,
but any subsequent logins seem to fail with the message:
dovecot: Oct 10 11:04:31 Error: Maximum number of mail processes exceeded
In the dovecot log file.
I'm also oddly seeing the message:
Oct 10 11:01:05 popbkup pop3-login: [ID 799321
2006 Jan 24
1
Fwd: Weird problem opening mbox in beta1/2
Hmm, this is peculiar!
This mailbox has been unchanged on my test server since September. I've
been using it to test each new version of Dovecot just after I've
compiled it.
When beta1 was released, I opened this mbox with no problems. However,
when I upgraded to beta2, I got "file size unexpectedly shrinked in mbox
file /export/mail/a/24/vis99003/INBOX (16895967 vs 16899267)".
2005 Aug 23
2
mbox of list archives?
Is their an mbox kicking around somewhere of all the list archives?
Ted
2008 Jul 23
2
Dovecot 1.1.1 + zlib plugin + mbox crash
I've tried this on both Solaris 8 and SuSE Enterprise 9 (64-bit).
I get a assert-crash when using a gzipped mbox folder
. OK Logged in.
. SELECT test.gz
* FLAGS (\Answered \Flagged \Deleted \Seen \Draft $Label4 $Label2
$Label1 $Label3 $Label5)
* OK [PERMANENTFLAGS ()] Read-only mailbox.
* 167 EXISTS
* 0 RECENT
* OK [UNSEEN 2] First unseen.
* OK [UIDVALIDITY 1096038620] UIDs valid
* OK
2008 Jun 19
3
Compile failure on Dovecot 1.1-rc12
I am getting this failure when trying to compile dovecot on Sparc Solaris 8:
make[4]: Entering directory
`/home/systems/looneytr/dovecot-1.1.rc12/src/lib'
source='str-find.c' object='str-find.o' libtool=no \
DEPDIR=.deps depmode=gcc /bin/bash ../../depcomp \
gcc -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I. -I../.. -I/usr/local/openssl/include -g
-O2 -Wall -W -Wmissing-prototypes
2005 Mar 15
2
Read-only mail folders
Is it possible to have folders on read-only partitions in Dovecot
1.0-stable?
We have a NetApp fileserver which would probably be accessed via NFS
(though iSCSI is possible) and which stores readonly "snapshots" of
every directory accessible as .snapshot (but usually hidden from the
operating system). It would be very nice to set up a "snapshot"
namespace something like
2005 May 05
1
1.0-stable loses flag changes sometimes?
I've been struggling with an odd bug in the latest 1.0-stable
(20050427) release. Sometimes Dovecot seems to forget that a message
has been read or deleted and marks it unread (or not deleted).
As far as I've been able to determine, it seems to happen when
1) There have been several recent deliveries
2) Possibly some of those deliveries are of multiple messages
3) Possibly they are read
2005 Aug 27
2
Permission denied changing to mail directory
I have 3 domains using one mail server. I've set the dovecot mail
directories to be
/mail/mail/%d/%n
When someone logs on, dovecot attempt to navigate to the domain
directory first & we get a permission denied, and we get no further. Its
very odd because (a) it was working up until 16:50 on Thursday & (b) the
directories now have 777 access. Each user is (at present) a separate
2005 Apr 13
1
Failed to create storage with data:
Hi, i'm using dovecot-1.0-stable.
All my mail accounts are virtual accounts that come from pam with the
following configuration in auth_default:
passdb = pam
userdb = static uid=5000 gid=5000 home=/var/mail/vhost/example.com/%n
mail=/var/mail/vhost/example.com/%n
for a user foo, if the directory /var/mail/vhost/example.com/foo already
exists, then all is ok, but if the directory
2006 Aug 21
4
RC7: its issues or mine?
Background: I'm new to dovecot (although with many years Washington IMAP
behind me). We're considering migrating from Washington IMAP to dovecot
on the main service here, and have just started trying dovecot, using RC7.
Washington, IMAP has the usual(-ish) "/var/spool/mail" shared area for the
INBOX (trad. UNIX "From " format); a user's folders default to being
2006 Feb 24
1
INBOX as Maildir and folders as mbox
Hi,
I was wondering whether anybody has managed to get Dovecot 1.0 to store
INBOX as Maildir and folders as mbox.
I've tried something like
default_mail_env =
mbox:/folders/user/mail:INBOX=maildir:/inboxes/maildir/user:INDEX=/indexes/user
but it doesn't seem to work (treats INBOX as mbox).
I'm hoping to move some INBOXes from mbox on local disk to Maildir on
nicely-mirrored NetApp
2006 Jan 14
2
20060114 snapshot compilation warnings
Timo,
I've noticed a couple of extra compilation errors in last night's
snapshot compared to the snapshot I downloaded on Tuesday, probably due
to the int -> bool change :- (gcc 3.3.2 on Solaris 8)
mbox-sync.c: In function `mbox_sync':
mbox-sync.c:1568: warning: comparison is always false due to limited
range of data type
index-search.c: In function `search_index_arg':
2005 Mar 17
1
Namespaces and subscriptions
I've got a problem with subscriptions in 1.0-stable when migrating from
UW-IMAP.
I've modified the SUBSCRIPTION_FILE_NAME entries as suggested in the
Wiki http://wiki.dovecot.org/Migration and included the "~/mail/" etc.
hidden namespaces.
The .mailboxlist files contain entries like "~/mail/somefolder" and the
clients have "~/mail/" set as a prefix.
In
2005 May 27
2
imap disconnects on my account only
Talk about personal problems!
I am using dovecot-0.99.13-4.FC2, and everything has been going fine
for months. Earlier this afternoon, Thunderbird's status pane would
say 'Sending authenticate login information...' and I would no longer
receive email.
When I checked with others, they were fine and dandy.
I tried kmail, evolution, and even tried webmail. All had connection errors.
2005 Sep 21
1
Another address-spec problem
I've had complaints from users about "MISSING_DOMAIN" in header fields
and I've tracked it down to having "." in an unquoted display name.
By my reading of RFC2822 (especially section 4.1)
A N Other <a.n.other at somewhere.org>
"A. N. Other" <a.n.other at somewhere.org>
are legal, but
A. N. Other <a.n.other at somewhere.org>
is
2005 Mar 22
2
Address with whitespace shows as ""@MISSING_DOMAIN
It seems that Dovecot gets confused when presented with a header like:
From: someone at somewhere.org
i.e. with leading whitespace and no "friendly name"
This shows up as ""@MISSING_DOMAIN in clients, such as Pine, that
believe what Dovecot tells them rather than parsing the headers
themselves (e.g. Thunderbird).
Here's a sample IMAP session:
xyz FETCH 728 ENVELOPE
2007 Mar 10
4
pre-1.0.rc27: Index and mbox fixes
I've been doing some stress testing in the last few days and fixing all
the errors I saw. I'm hoping that I've finally really fixed all the
index/mbox problems. So, again I think the only thing left for v1.0 is
the documentation. Please test this nightly snapshot before I'll release
rc27 tomorrow:
http://dovecot.org/nightly/dovecot-latest.tar.gz
If you've seen any of the