similar to: dovecot, procmail and deliver

Displaying 20 results from an estimated 9000 matches similar to: "dovecot, procmail and deliver"

2006 Aug 31
1
deliver LDA and INBOX location
(OS: Fedora Core 5; dovecot: 1.0 rc7) On a typical UNIX-like OS, the INBOXes are in "/var/spool/mail/" using the user identifier: so user 'fred' has INBOX "/var/spool/mail/fred". We have a well-established different convention which subdivides this, based on the last two digits of the uid: "/var/spool/mail/12/fred" (for fred's uid as something ending
2007 Sep 24
1
Deliver, sendmail & envelope From_
Sorry, couldn't find this in the archives. Under freebsd 4.x, the native mail.local that sendmail uses by default writes From_ lines that include the origin address. This is very readily parsable and handy for quick greps in mboxes. But deliver defaults it to MAILER-DAEMON. I see you can specify the envelope From_ with "-f", but I'm not sure how that's useful. Also
2006 Sep 05
2
rc7 bug? [Was: deliver LDA and INBOX location] (fwd)
Anyone had any thoughts on the item below? If the problem is with my config, I'd like to be guided towards how I might resolve it. If it is a bug in rc7, it would be good to fix it, and I'd be happy to beta-test. -- : David Lee I.T. Service : : Senior Systems Programmer Computer Centre : :
2006 Jul 19
3
/var/spool/mail directory size and subdirectories
(Complete newbie to dovecot. I hope what follows isn't something I've missed in some FAQ somewhere...) On a traditional UNIX filesystem with UW-IMAP several years ago, we encountered major performance problems when "/var/spool/mail/" got big (we would currently be ~20,000 entries). This was due to the inefficiency of the UNIX filesystem when creating and deleting the lockfiles
2006 Sep 15
3
RC7: BUG! and patch [Was: Re: rc7 bug? [Was: deliver LDA and INBOX location] (fwd)] (fwd)
Could someone confirm, please, that this bug report and its proposed fix are being checked? 1. Is my analysis (message below) about right? 2. Is my proposed patch (attached) about right? 3. Is this being addressed for "rc8" (or whatever) and its successors? Many thanks. -- : David Lee I.T. Service : : Senior Systems Programmer
2006 Jul 03
0
No subject
I'd need "04" including its leading "0". ("1200"->"00" etc.) > Depending on what other tools you use, you could also use the hash (H) > modifier, but maybe your delivery agent can't do that (unless of course > you plan to use dovecot-lda too) With our UW set-up, everything goes through UW's c-client library (sendmail local
2007 May 22
1
simultaneous access to folder
We have for many years been a UW-IMAP site, with users having their own traditional, private, mbox-format INBOX and folders: almost (but not quite) no complications of shared or simultaneous access. We have just completed a transparent transition to dovecot (official 1.0.0 release). But we have one residual issue affecting one important user account. UW-IMAP specifically only allows single
2006 Oct 11
2
1.0rc8 status report
A quick status report on how 1.0rc8 behaved in service for a few hours with several hundred simultaneous users, at a site very new to dovecot. Oh, and a question at the end. Summary: Reasonable for a first shot but one significant problem, requiring backing off. Background: We have a long-established UW-IMAP service for a user population of about 20,000 based on a few Linux (Redhat) machines
2006 Aug 21
4
RC7: its issues or mine?
Background: I'm new to dovecot (although with many years Washington IMAP behind me). We're considering migrating from Washington IMAP to dovecot on the main service here, and have just started trying dovecot, using RC7. Washington, IMAP has the usual(-ish) "/var/spool/mail" shared area for the INBOX (trad. UNIX "From " format); a user's folders default to being
2006 Nov 24
1
mailadm? authentication vs. authorization?
Does "dovecot" have anything similar to the UW IMAP "mailadm" group operation? From near the end of: http://www.washington.edu/imap/documentation/RELNOTES.html 'Support for SASL authentication identity vs. authorization identity in the IMAP and POP3 servers. If the user indicated by the authentication identity is in the "mailadm" group, he may
2010 Jun 28
2
Axes intercept
I have a plot where the values of the y axis go from a positive number to a negative number and I want the x axis to intercept at zero rather than at the bottom of the y axis, regardless of its value. Can anyone help me to do this? Thanks in advance Vivien Vivien Kent MSc Oxon PhD candidate Evolutionary Anthropology Research Group Department of Anthropology Durham University Dawson
2002 Nov 22
4
Small change to plot.xy
Hi everyone, Is there any reason why we should not automatically coerce a factor supplied as an argument to col in a plotting function? The following modification (to R-1.6.1) seems pretty harmless > plot.xy function (xy, type, pch = 1, lty = "solid", col = par("fg"), bg = NA, cex = 1, ...) { if (is.factor(col)) col <- codes(col)
2006 Aug 17
17
1.0 RC7 released
http://dovecot.org/releases/dovecot-1.0.rc7.tar.gz http://dovecot.org/releases/dovecot-1.0.rc7.tar.gz.sig Can everyone now agree that there are no more hangs? :) * Require that Dovecot master process's version number matches the child process's, unless version_ignore=yes. Usually it's an accidental installation problem if the version numbers don't match. * Maildir: Create
2006 Aug 17
17
1.0 RC7 released
http://dovecot.org/releases/dovecot-1.0.rc7.tar.gz http://dovecot.org/releases/dovecot-1.0.rc7.tar.gz.sig Can everyone now agree that there are no more hangs? :) * Require that Dovecot master process's version number matches the child process's, unless version_ignore=yes. Usually it's an accidental installation problem if the version numbers don't match. * Maildir: Create
1999 Aug 18
2
diag()
I would like to suggest a slight modification to diag(). In the case where x is a matrix with both row names and column names the same, it would be reasonable if the resulting vector also had those names. I often use diag() on variance matrices, where this modification is helpful. The modification requires replacing if (is.matrix(x) && nargs() == 1) return(c(x)[1 +
2001 Apr 11
5
replicating lists
Hi Everyone, At the moment it is not possible to replicate complex lists, but only simple ones: > rep(list(fred = 1:10), 10) # works fine > rep(list(fred = 1:10, happy = "squash"), 10) Error in rep(list(fred = 1:10, happy = "squash"), 10) : Unimplemented feature in rep There is nothing in ?rep that suggests that the latter should not work, and I think it would
2008 Jul 02
2
Can't connect to auth server at /var/run/dovecot/auth-master: No such file or directory
Hello all. Just one quick stupid question. ;-( Im try to configure Exim + Dovecot 1.1.1 on FreeBSD 7.0 Then im try to send mail in logs im see this: deliver(admin at domain.off): Jul 02 13:52:22 Error: Can't connect to auth server at /var/run/dovecot/auth-master: No such file or directory %ls -al /var/run/dovecot/* srw-rw---- 1 exim wheel /var/run/dovecot/auth-client srw------- 1
2006 Oct 20
4
1.0.rc10 status report
(Background: Relatively new to dovecot; looking to do transparent replacement of long-established UW-IMAP on cluster of Linux boxes which NFS-mount a shared "/var/spool/mail".) With rc8, where I had already increased "login_max_processes_count" from default 128 to 1024, we had still hit the issue of too many logins crashing dovecot, so that trial had only lasted a couple of
2006 Oct 04
1
fix: LDA logging
Timo: As discussed over the last couple of days. Please could the attached patch be applied to "deliver.c" so that it can log (syslog etc.) final delivery into the destination mailbox. This completes a hitherto missing part in logging an email's progress; it is useful (for example) to diagnose "my email wasn't delivered" problems. Thanks. -- : David Lee
2006 Oct 12
2
1.0rc8: another problem? Possibly 64-bit index?
Yesterday I gave a status report about 10.rc8 in production, which mentioned a problem about "Login process died too early..." Timo suggested a patch for logging error messages. I've applied this. Others suggested increasing "login_max_processes_count". That was already way above our likely maximum, but I've doubled it anyway. Today, I've just repeated the