Displaying 20 results from an estimated 2000 matches similar to: "DSpam plugin"
2006 Sep 20
1
DSpam mysql-plugin (was DSpam plugin)
After wrestling with Johannes's original plugin, I had a go at the mysql
plugin that Tim wrote, as described here:
http://members.plug.org.au/~linuxalien/dokuwiki/projects:dovecot-mysql-dspam-plugin
I kept getting "Error: imap dump-capability process killed with signal
11" when attempting to start dovecot with this plugin. I traced the
error to line 656 of master-settings.c in
2003 Oct 30
3
Winbind: can't log in as domain user
Sorry about the lengthy post - I'm putting as much in here as I can in
hopes that someone can help me ferret out the problem.
Basic problem is that domain users can't successfully log into the
linux box. I'm trying to set this box up as an ltsp server
authenticating against our existing AD (although this is actually in a
test lab - I didn't really want to trash anything real
2006 Feb 22
0
fcntl and F_NOTIFY
I've set up dovecot on a testbed server. Each time a user ('myusername')
connects via imap, I get the following info in mail.log:
dovecot: imap(myusername): fcntl(F_NOTIFY) failed: Invalid argument
I'm using these config settings in dovecot.conf in an attempt to avoid fcntl
lock_method = dotlock
mbox_read_locks = dotlock
mbox_write_locks = dotlock
I've looked through the
2006 Apr 08
2
dovecot-dspam-plugin not launching dspam
hello,
i added the dovecot-dspam-plugin [1] to my dovecot-installation. when
trying to move a mail out of or into the predefined spamfolder with
thunderbird a messagebox shows : "dspam failed" and the message remains
in its original position. i am using virtual mail users contained in a
postgresql-database [2]. normal imap access and dspam training from the
commandline works fine.
2002 Mar 12
3
ltsp kernel crash
Hi,
I've been using pxe-enabled nic's with an lzpxe-etherboot image generated
by rom-o-matic.net to boot a ltsp.org kernel, with dhcp 3 to use if statements to determine which filename
option he gives to the pxe/etherboot dhcp client.Explained at
http://www.ltsp.org/documentation/pxe.howto.html
This works perfectly, except for the fact that you can't use 1 etherboot pxe image for
2013 Mar 30
1
Question regarding config, not sure if syslinux or tftp-hpa related
Good morning everybody,
I'm pretty new to syslinux & tftp-hpa, and so I'm not quite sure where
my question belongs to, but I'll try it here first.
I want to enhance the network services by offering a LTSP (just for the
case the pc or laptop doesn't work for some reasons). And so, for
testing, I added a second linux-based system (lets call it system-b).
Currently the tftpd
2004 Jan 31
1
newbie thinclient env
i have a lot of questions, maybe you've got some answers. I've got the
following setup :
1 central server ( linux ) , 17 servers ( LTSP ) on different locations,
where each server has a number of thinclients connected to it ( max 6 ) The
central server / 17 LTSP servers are on the internet and share 1 VPN (
freeswan ). It would be nice if the 17 LTSP servers could use asterix on one
2008 Jul 23
5
Dovecot antispam (X-DSPAM-Signature)
Hi,
I recently installed an IMAP server with dovecot and the dovecot
antispam plugin with dspam backend.
If I configure dspam to not include the signature in the
X-DSPAM-Signature header will I be able to move mail into SPAM folder?
Regards,
Isabel
2007 Apr 02
2
How to integrate dspam and dovecot
Hello all,
I am currently setting up a new mail server with Qmail, OpenLDAP and
Dovecot in CentOS-4.4. Qmail version is 1.03, OpenLDAP is 2.3 and
Dovecot version is dovecot-1.0-3_50.rc27(RPM). I have successfully
installed and tested it. But I have two issues with the current setup:
#1.
I am using dovecot LDA and configured the OpenLDAP such that the mail
be delivered to the virtual users
2014 Jul 17
1
dspam dovecot-lda
Hello list,
Is there a way to call a spam filter in dovecot-lda like maildrop uses
the xfilter command within the .mailfilter file to do the same?
Eric
2008 Sep 03
3
antispam plugin problem with dspam
I'm trying to use the dovecot antispam plugin with dspam.
I'm running dovecot 1.1.2.
Using thunderbird and IMAP, when I drag a spam message from the inbox
into the SPAM folder, I get a popup saying "The current command did not
succeed. The mail server responded: antispam signature not found.
When I look at the message in the maildir folder, I see the dspam
signature both in the
2007 Nov 19
2
dspam integration
Hi,
I see http://johannes.sipsolutions.net/Projects/dovecot-antispam and
http://blog.cynapses.org/2007/09/13/dovecot-dspam-plugin/ solutions.
Second git repo is not answer, first one is cloned, but I see some
drawbacks with it.
Dspam backend is more native solution but libdspam using instead of
dspam external binary looks like preffered way to integrate dspam.
Another problem is waiting for
2008 May 24
3
ipconfig and boot filename option
Hi,
ipconfig is used in ltsp (thin clients) initramfs. Some of the users
have to have 2 dhcp servers in ltsp environments, so they hit on this
problem:
The first dhcp request is from the pxe rom boot code. This code
ignores any dhcp offers that don't have a filename field. So they
always get the correct address, from the ltsp server.
The second dhcp request (in initramfs) is done by
2006 Apr 19
2
DSPAM Plugin Deployment (Was Re: Unoffical Survey - What MTA/Spam filtering do you use?)
On 4/19/06, Johannes Berg <johannes at sipsolutions.net> wrote:
> On Tue, 2006-04-18 at 22:56 +0200, Marcus Rueckert wrote:
>
> > libdspam instead of system("dspam...")
>
> That's a lot of work, how about calling to the dspam server instead?
I'm about to start building a system for ~10,000 users, using dovecot,
and was going to use dspam with it... Is
2002 Oct 03
2
Cannot connect WinXP
Hi All
Can't connect WinXP
(Remark: Group=SEC WinXP=M40G
Samba Server=server.ltsp
ipchains stop)
# mount -t smbfs //M40G/Shared /mnt/WinXP/
params.c:Parameter() - Ignoring badly formed line in configuration file:
127.0.0.1 localhost localhost.localdomain
params.c:Parameter() - Ignoring badly formed line in configuration file:
192.168.0.1 M40G
params.c:Parameter() - Unexpected
2013 Nov 25
1
Dovecot 2.2.7/2.2.8 failing to call dspam with antispam
Hello again,
I'm running Gentoo AMD64 2013 with postfix, mysql, dovecot and dspam :
dovecot 2.2.8 (it was working fine with 2.2.6 after doing a chmod 4511
on dspam binary), dspam 3.10.2-r1 and dovecot-antispam-2.0_pre20130429
(recompiled after each dovecot upgrade).
I've set dspam to debug, and mail_debug to yes.
uid 1001 is user vmail (dovecot is running under vmail)
gid 12 is group
2007 Jul 11
2
dovecot-dspam plugin & virtual users
Hi list, hi Johannes,
I'm trying to use the dovecot-dspam plugin (
http://johannes.sipsolutions.net/Projects/dovecot-dspam-integration )
with vpopmail's virtual users.
All seems well, except for the fact that dspam should be called with
'--user currentuser at currentdomain.com' at line 157 here:
http://johannes.sipsolutions.net/Projects/dovecot-dspam-integration/beta7-code
For my
2007 Jul 25
1
dspam plugin
Hello,
I'm trying to install the dspam plugin to dovecot.
So far, I've
Installed dovecot 1.0.2 from RPM and set up
Installed dspam 3.8.0, set up and integrated with postfix, using
dspam as local delivery agent before dovecot's deliver
Downloaded the dovecot 1.0.2 source in order to compile the C file
http://johannes.sipsolutions.net/Projects/dovecot-dspam-integration/
2009 Jun 13
3
dovecot-antispam plugin and "Failed to call dspam" message
Hi,
I had this working until I recently upgraded Dovecot, and now I'm getting a message back from
Thunderbird of "Failed to call dspam." when I attempt to move a message into one of the designated
spam folders.
However, I know from looking at the dspam system.log file, the retraining actually happens - so it
-does- appear to be calling dspam. It appears that the 'move'
2008 Apr 18
2
Upstream vendor's diskless vs LTSP
Hello all,
I have a customer that insists of using upstream vendor's diskless
(system-config-netboot) rather than LTSP. The reason is that he wants to use
a 100% packages from the vendor, not from LTSP or any other party.
I try the vendor's diskless system, and although it's very simple to setup, it
lacks the support and/or documentation whereas LTSP is very good in it.
Another