similar to: Maildir folder separator

Dear All I have a test system where I am trying out 1.1.4 On the old 1.0rc6 (!) system I had edited: src/lib-storage/index/maildir/mail-storage.h to change: #define MAILDIR_FS_SEP ';' #define MAILDIR_FS_SEP_S ";" so I can get some mail folder hierarchy and '.'s in folder names - this all worked perfectly. Under 1.1.4 the MAILDIR_FS_SEP lines are no longer present.

Hello, I am currently working on a patch to add IMAPdir support to dovecot. (For those who do not know, IMAPdir is exactly like Maildir except that instead of having a folder .foo it would just be foo. The advantage is that the file system is slightly easier to search through without the dot in front of the folders.) The first thing I did was get the configuration file working for Maildir.

I have a problem with machine trust accounts breaking in a purely Samba controlled domain. I have one master Samba server acting as a PDC, and three slave servers in different networks. The UNIX user account information is updated by means of NIS, and smbpasswd gets rsync'ed to the slave servers whenever there is a change in the file. All this works without problems at all times. When I

Hi there We are trying to move over from 1 IMAP server to another, but the problem is dovecot does not allow .'s in folder names (and we have quite a number of people who do have .'s in their folder names (ie "www.domain stuff") Is there anyway of allowing dovecot to allow .'s in folder names? Thanks Craig Whitmore -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment

hi, I use dovecot 1.0rc15 with one maildir namespace. I'd like to be able to use '.' in folders and subfolders name. So, I setup the default namespace with separator =':' But, when I create some folders and then subfolders with thunderbird the filename one the server are named with some '.' no ':'... It seems that dovecot always interprets '.'

Greetings - I think I've just had one of my fears confirmed: not Dovecot-specific exactly, but it affects how we will use of Prayer (Webmail Software) with Dovecot... Currently our production service uses MBX-format mailboxes with the UW IMAP server; we also use the University of Cambridge "Prayer" software for Webmail. By default Prayer saves its preference settings,

Hello all, We have Samba (2.2.5) running on three servers, each in a different subnet. One of them is a PDC (domain master = yes). The Samba PDC is also the NIS master. The smbpasswd is replicated using rsync to the other machines that act as Samba BDCs (domain master = no). They are also NIS slave servers. The smbpasswd synchronization takes place automatically every time smbpasswd is updated,

Hello, I just rsync'd my 1TB partitions formated with jfs filesystem containing ~720GB data. I saw -3G difference between source and destination which made me suspect possible dataloss. Also I had experienced loss of integrity on my previous copies but I did not find the cause until now. As command line I used following: sh-3.2# rsync --verbose --sparse --append-verify --fuzzy --progress

> IIRC the client should contact the PDC (domain<0x1b>). But can you > check the logs and see if the clients are trying to change it on > domain<0x1c> (any DC)? Thanks. Can you give me any hints on how to find such information in the log files? My log level is 5, and I can find some password change messages in the logs, but I don't know how to check if they are looking

Ping Identity Corporation, a mid-sized identity solutions company, is currently looking for 2 contractors (3+ months w/option to hire at contract end) to assist in developing and extending our internal corporate application platform. This internally-developed platform drives most aspects of our company, from sales leads to support to applications that assist in day-to-day operations. We are

The NEWS for R-devel has the following item: > The previously included versions of zlib, bzip2, xz and PCRE have > been removed, so suitable external (usually system) versions are > required (see the ?R Installation and Administration? manual). Therefore I believe the following information in 'src/library/base/man/regex.Rd' is no longer valid: > If PCRE support was compiled

I get an error when running "make check" after building R-devel r70629 on Ubuntu 14.04. Here are the relevant lines in the file "reg-tests-1c.Rout.fail": > ## m1z uses match(x, *) with length(x) == 1 and failed in R 3.3.0 > ## PR#16909 - a consequence of the match() bug; check here too: > dv <- data.frame(var?1 = 1:3, var?2 = 3); dv[,"var?2"]

On 18/05/16 13:50, Martin Maechler wrote: >>>>>> Mikko Korpela <mikko.korpela at helsinki.fi> >>>>>> on Wed, 18 May 2016 13:05:24 +0300 writes: > > > I get an error when running "make check" after building > > R-devel r70629 on Ubuntu 14.04. > > Here are the relevant > > lines in the file

Hi, In the aftermath of the signing key expiring a couple of days ago, it seems that the Ubuntu repositories are no longer signed (there is no Release.gpg file present). This is not a good situation as users cannot verify the packages' origin. I hope this will be fixed promptly :-) Thank you, Mikko Pesari

On Tegra186, powergating is handled by the BPMP power domain provider and the "legacy" powergating API is not available. Therefore skip these calls if we are attached to a power domain. Signed-off-by: Mikko Perttunen <mperttunen at nvidia.com> --- drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nvkm/engine/device/tegra.c | 10 ++++++---- 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-) diff --git

Hello everyone, it seems that GP10B support has regressed recently. With linux-next, I need to modify device/base.c to set .mmu = gp10b_mmu_new for GP10B (makes sense - I guess this was left as gf100_mmu_new as a typo) to probe. After that, running a trivial testcase (running a NOP method in 3D class) fails with [ 110.084649] nouveau 17000000.gpu: fifo: read fault at 0000011000 engine 06

With new R releases soon to come, I suggest updating the Rcopyright macro in "doc/manual/R-defs.texi" to use year 2017. -- Mikko Korpela Department of Geosciences and Geography University of Helsinki

On 10/20/2015 05:18 PM, Michael Rutter wrote: > On 10/20/2015 09:51 AM, Mikko Pesari wrote: >> Hi, >> >> In the aftermath of the signing key expiring a couple of days ago, it >> seems that the Ubuntu repositories are no longer signed (there is no >> Release.gpg file present). This is not a good situation as users cannot >> verify the packages' origin.

(Belated) thanks for the confirmation, Ista. I just reported this issue on the R bug tracker: https://bugs.r-project.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=17412 Best regards, - Mikko -----Alkuper?inen viesti----- L?hett?j?: Ista Zahn [mailto:istazahn at gmail.com] L?hetetty: 7. helmikuuta 2018 17:05 Vastaanottaja: Korpela Mikko (MML) Kopio: r-devel at r-project.org Aihe: Re: [Rd] Possible bug in

On Thu, Feb 23, 2017 at 03:23:10PM +0100, Martin Maechler wrote: > >>>>> Mikko Korpela <mikko.korpela at helsinki.fi> > >>>>> on Thu, 23 Feb 2017 14:02:58 +0200 writes: > > > With new R releases soon to come, I suggest updating the > > Rcopyright macro in "doc/manual/R-defs.texi" to use year > > 2017. >