similar to: Improving interaction/performance with Mail.app

On 05/25/2018 09:17 AM, Michal Privoznik wrote: >>> We should probably seed it with data from /dev/urandom, and/or the new >>> Linux getrandom() syscall (or BSD equivalent). > > I'm not quite sure that right after reboot there's going to be enough > entropy. Every service that's starting wants some random bits. But it's > probably better than what we

On 05/29/2018 03:38 PM, Martin Kletzander wrote: > On Fri, May 25, 2018 at 09:37:44AM -0500, Eric Blake wrote: >> On 05/25/2018 09:17 AM, Michal Privoznik wrote: >> >>>>> We should probably seed it with data from /dev/urandom, and/or the new >>>>> Linux getrandom() syscall (or BSD equivalent). >>> >>> I'm not quite sure that right

[Note: this has already been sent to comp.os.linux.announce.] -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- It has come to my attention that the recent 1.6 release of MAKEDEV-C inadvertently created /dev/random and /dev/urandom with the wrong permissions. /dev/random and /dev/urandom should look like this: crw-r--r-- 1 root system 1, 8 Feb 21 14:42 /dev/random crw-r--r-- 1 root system

On Tue, May 29, 2018 at 10:06:25AM -0400, John Ferlan wrote: > > >On 05/29/2018 09:44 AM, Michal Privoznik wrote: >> On 05/29/2018 03:38 PM, Martin Kletzander wrote: >>> On Fri, May 25, 2018 at 09:37:44AM -0500, Eric Blake wrote: >>>> On 05/25/2018 09:17 AM, Michal Privoznik wrote: >>>> >>>>>>> We should probably seed it with

Roger Marquis wrote: > [snip] > >It takes all of 2 seconds to generate a ssh 2 new session on a >500Mhz cpu (causing less than 20% utilization). Considering that >99% of even the most heavily loaded servers have more than enough >cpu for this task I don't really see it as an issue. > >Also, by generating a different key for each session you get better >entropy,

On Fri, Jun 01, 2018 at 11:17:44AM +0100, Daniel P. Berrangé wrote: >On Wed, May 30, 2018 at 10:21:54PM +0200, Martin Kletzander wrote: >> On Tue, May 29, 2018 at 10:06:25AM -0400, John Ferlan wrote: >> > >> > >> > On 05/29/2018 09:44 AM, Michal Privoznik wrote: >> > > On 05/29/2018 03:38 PM, Martin Kletzander wrote: >> > > > On Fri,

Reviving an ancient thread: On 11/04/2014 02:18 AM, Daniel P. Berrange wrote: > On Mon, Nov 03, 2014 at 11:09:12AM -0500, Brian Rak wrote: >> I just ran into an issue where I had about 30 guests get duplicate mac >> addresses assigned. These were scattered across 30 different machines. >> >> Some debugging revealed that: >> >> 1) All the host machines were

Hi, I am interested in applying to LLVM as part Google Summer of Code 2015. I have been going through LLVM code since about 4 months now, and while going though mailing list discussions I found particular interest in the point raised by Arch Robinson in January about the development of a floating point range check pass in LLVM. I have been in touch with Arch as well as Hal Finkel about this and

Hi experts, I picked up a copy of the rspec book and wrote some tests in spec/lib and spec/models for my Rails 2.3.8 code. I was using rspec 2.5.1, rspec-core 2.5.0, rspec-expectations 2.5.0 et. al. But I realised that the rspec-rails version I am using is meant for Rails3. Which version of rspec-rails should I use for Rails 2.3.8? Best, Radhesh -- Posted via http://www.ruby-forum.com/.

Hi, I am working on some changes to LazyValueInfo and I wanted to see how it was used in existing passes. Currently I can see that Jump Threading and Correlated Value Propagation are the 2 passes that use LazyValueInfo. However on the LLVM docs page of passes (http://llvm.org/docs/Passes.html <http://llvm.org/docs/Passes.html>), Correlated Value Propagation is not mentioned as a pass. Does

Hello Andrew & Louis, Yesterday by around 1:30 PM we had the same issue. Samba AD kicked all of us out and RSAT did not connect to any domain controllers. /*Incidentally the RSAT that caused this error was running on Windows 7 Professional 64 Bit edition.*/ When I restarted the samba-ad-dc service, all started working well again. However, as mentioned again, I could not trace the error

Hi all, So, it's been a while. I'm just ramping back up with Dovecot after a hiatus of a few years. I've been using it fine, complete with Sieve, for about a year, with little or no issues. I finally got around to setting up a second account, to start figuring out how I want to do some plus address filtering. In a nutshell, I want to put mail for foo+bar in foo's 'bar'

I'm facing a problem with dovecot 1.0 test-59; ever since I installed it and use it my random pool is always depleted whenever someone opens an imap connection. This wouldn't be too bad if the machine was used interactively, but since it is not and other services read directly from /dev/random those are sometimes blocked due to dovecot depleting the pool by reading /dev/urandom. Thus

I switched for mbox to maildir last night and now searching folders isn't working. Getting a timeout. Is there something I might have forgot to configure?

Running the nightly from two days ago. The Dovecot log shows no errors, but I keep getting login errors for a few users. top shows: 71486 user1 1 96 0 4552K 2408K lockd 0 0:00 0.00% imap 11170 user2 1 96 0 4440K 2480K lockd 0 0:00 0.00% imap And a ps aux shows that these processes have been open for hours. If I move the mbox that contains their mail, the same

It seems deliver is taking up a lot of cpu. Is there a way to throttle just the delivery command?

dovecot 0.99 still (RHEL4), I'm sorry to say. The config is for mbox's to live on the user's home disk. If the user tries to make an imap connection when his home disk is unmounted, various permission denied messages are logged, as expected, but then the imap process seems to hang around instead of aborting. The result is that eventually the imap process limit is reached, and even

Hello, I'm trying to get more info about user activity (especially when they delete some email). So, I follow info from http://wiki2.dovecot.org/Plugins/MailLog to enabled mail logger plugin, but I don't see anything in my logs. Can you tell me what I'm missing ? Thanks. # doveconf -n # 2.2.10.3: /etc/dovecot/dovecot.conf # OS: Linux 3.2.0-4-amd64 x86_64 Debian 7.4 ext4

I''m looking for some help in getting the proper escape sequence within the generate function. Ultimately what I''m trying to do is generate some random strings, store them as variables, and use those variables to populate configuration files stored as templates. I can get this to work when applying the template on the localhost, but it fails when applied via the puppet

On 22 Oct 2020, at 10:05, @lbutlr <kremels at kreme.com> wrote: > require ["variables", "copy"]; > > if address :matches ["To", "Cc"] ["*@*."] { > redirect :copy "backup+295.${1}.${2}@*example.com*"; > } I have tried this with similar results: require ["copy", "variables",