similar to: Inconsistent handling of CRLF in APPEND

Just ran into a problem[1]. It seems to have been introduced by changeset 224 [2], a fix for ticket 126 [3]. The root is the number of CRLFs Camping puts between the headers and the body of the response. This has changed at least 3 times; right now we''re back to 1. (ie. every header ends in a CRLF, and then there''s the body) The HTTP RFC[4], the CGI spec[5] and the FastCGI

Hi, could somebody apply the below patch to contrib/cygwin/ssh-host-config? The patch solves a problem with the way, the Windows pendant of the /etc/services file is used. This file has (obviously) CRLF line endings. The ssh-host-config file tries to accomodate that when adding the ssh service entries but I never reviewed this functionality in the light of some major changes in the Cygwin DLL.

Hi. I've made a strange observation. When having Dovecot (at least) with maildir and moving (via IMAP) mail received by some client (Evolution 3.4) into it the following happens: Regardless of whether the mail was originally(!) set with CRLF or LF (i.e. when I use netcat to submit the plain SMTP to the relaying MTA). When the client (Evolution) had received the mail via POP3 before moving

Hi, we are migrating from Cyrus 2.3.7 to Dovecot 2.2.13. We have ~7000 maildirs with ~500GB. Our goal is to do the migration without users have notice and with the shortest service downtime. The users use IMAP (with shared folders and ACL), POP3 and sieve filters. As a first choice, we tried the Dovecot's dsync tool. First tests were great, but we are not able to change the Cyrus auth

I've read about one month back this list's messages. I've still 216 messages from this year marked as "unread" which I should look into more (+258 older ones). Also I've 180 "unread" messages in my INBOX also which might contain something useful. So those messages could still contain something that should be added to this list. Anyway looking at my current

Hello everyone, I'm using the very good imaptest [0] tool to test my little imap server implementation. I've tried to use the dovecot-crlf [1] file, but it looks like there are some major issues : $ grep -n "In-Reply-To.*;" tests/data/dovecot-crlf 479:In-Reply-To: <20020806175441.GA7148 at linux.taugt.net>; from rueckert at informatik.uni-rostock.de on Tue, Aug 06, 2002

Right, my understanding is that files that specifically need CRLF should say so via .gitattributes somewhere. autocrlf=false ought to work if your Windows editor doesn’t (or can be persuaded not to) introduce CRLFs. I’ve observed that the Visual Studio editor will detect the line-ending style of the file you’re editing, and imitate it. This works great until you create a new file. 😝 So I’ve

I installed Fixcrlf.exe from the Samba site. I tried it out on my NT 4.0 station, but it doesn't seem to accomplish anything. Specifically: - I bring up a file in Notepad - the text is one long line with black squares at the end of records, indicating that there are LF's but not CRLF's. - I drag the file icon from Explorer on to the FixCRLF icon and am rewarded with an

Hi all, I've configured "quota_exceeded_message" in dovecot 1.2, but I have two questions: - Can I use "CRLF" in it? I'd like have two messages: english and spanish. - If char character set in dovecot.conf is ASCII, How do I set special characters (spanish)? The email received is in UTF-8 Thanks you -- Antonio Casado Rodr?guez Administrador de Servicios de Red y

Since release candidate I added fix for CRLF + partial BODY[] fetching. I hope everything works :) I've been running it with mbox for a while and it seems to work fine. v0.99.10.1 2003-11-10 Timo Sirainen <tss at iki.fi> * mbox: \Draft and \Deleted flags used opposite flag chars in X-Status header. We were incompatible with other mbox accessing software. WARNING: Upgrading

Hi all, I am starting fresh with a local repository of mails, which almost certainly have duplicates in them. I am going to use maildirs, and ensure all mails are input with CRLFs. The question is: does anybody know how I can find and remove duplicates, either while injecting mail with IMAP, or afterward? I can use tools to find duplicate Message-IDs, but don't know of a way to remove

Hi everybody! I hope that you are not already "pissed off" of all the crlf/lf conversion discussion between dos and unix ;-) Concerning that topic I have a question / suggestion: This is what we have: We are using a Win NT 4.0 Server with Win95 clients. Additionally we have a Sun (Solaris 2.5) running in the same network. To access the Sun in character mode we use a terminal

Dovecot-2.2.1 does not appear to support URLs specified via non-synchronizing literals (RFC 2088 LITERAL+), and also does not read and discard the literal+ input after reporting the error. This results in the literal+ input being interpreted as IMAP commands, which could alter the user's mail store in unexpected ways and/or lead to the abrupt disconnection of the client for exceeding the

Hello, I have been told on Freenode's #dovecot to ask here. I have Exim 4.92 complaining about "Non-CRLF-terminated header, under CHUNKING: message abandoned" with redirects made by Pigeonhole 0.5.5 (with Dovecot 2.3.5.1). Please find relevant part of the traffic below, and help me determine whether Exim is correct on this. ? 0x0000:? 4500 0954 0000 4000 8006 0000 7f00 0001? E..T..

Hi, why uses openssh for printing error messages CRLF termination? Petr

Hi, I am migrating from 0.99.14 to 1.1.rc10 and from mbox to maildir. During the conversion, via convert plugin, I get this assertion failure: 2008-06-13 14:12:51 Error: IMAP(username): Next message unexpectedly lost from 4700 2008-06-13 14:12:51 Error: IMAP(username): Next message unexpectedly lost from 4700 2008-06-13 14:12:51 Panic: IMAP(username): file istream-crlf.c: line 49

No, I don't. But I do know that Samba provides transparent file access -- it has no idea what data is in the files it offers to the clients. It could be a database, a JPEG, a text document, or an executable program. What you suggest would be an extremely bad idea. You need better clients -- it is the clients that interpret the contents of the file. Samba is just another file access method.

On 25/07/2020 4:48 p.m., nospam at altfeld-im.de wrote: > Dear R developers, > > I am developing an R package which returns strings with new line codes. > I am not sure if I should use "\r\n" or "\n" in my returned strings on Windows platforms. > > What is the recommended best practice for package developers (and code in base R) for coding new lines in

https://bugzilla.mindrot.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2685 Bug ID: 2685 Summary: Case sensitive hostname matching Product: Portable OpenSSH Version: 7.4p1 Hardware: Other OS: All Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P5 Component: ssh Assignee: unassigned-bugs at mindrot.org

Dear all, When running R CMD check on Windows XP to test my package I get the following warning message: "* checking line endings in C/C++/Fortran sources/headers ... WARNING Found the following sources/headers with CR or CRLF line endings: src/xpsDict.h" The problem is that this file is created by the compiler AUTOMATICALLY during the compilation process, and since the file is