similar to: some basic questions

We have several latency-sensitive "pipeline"-style programs that have a measurable performance degredation when run on CentOS 5.x versus CentOS 4.x. By "pipeline" program, I mean one that has multiple threads. The mutiple threads work on shared data. Between each thread, there is a queue. So thread A gets data, pushes into Qab, thread B pulls from Qab, does some processing,

Full_Name: Teru KAMOGASHRIA Version: 2.0.1 OS: SunOS sun 5.10 Generic i86pc i386 i86pc Submission from: (NULL) (219.5.176.24) rbinom.c cannot be compiled because of the casting problem. /opt/SUNWspro/bin/cc -I. -I../../src/include -I../../src/include -I/usr/local/include -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -D__NO_MATH_INLINES -g -c rbinom.c -o rbinom.o "rbinom.c", line 60: operand must have real

Dear all, I wish to generate a lattice boxplot which skips an empty cell in a design. I have trawled r-help, scruitinized xyplot(lattice) help page, and merrily reproduced examples of using skip from a couple of previous r-help queries and the example given in Pinheiro & Bates. But I must be missing something... Here's an example (running R 1.9.1 on Win2k): # generate some data df1

Dear testers, 5.0.0-rc3 was just tagged. This is a release candidate in the real sense: if nothing bad comes up in testing, this is what the release is going to look like. Please build, test and upload binaries to the sftp (use the /data/testers-uploads/ directory) and let me know what issues remain. I know we're a little bit behind schedule, but hopefully we can get to 'final'

Hi All, I am trying to plot 4 graphs on to 1 page using layout(...), or par(mfcol = c(...)); with the function QQplot from the package PerformanceAnalytics. The problem is that, no matter what order I use, it only plots 3 graphs on to 1 page and the last QQplot is shunted to the next page. Also, this only happens to the QQplot, i.e. there is no problem with 4 Histograms. set.seed(1033) data

EVMS Enterprise Volume Management System sounds interesting, looks like it supported CentOS4, but not CentOS5. But maybe I'm not looking in the right places. -- Drew Einhorn -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.centos.org/pipermail/centos/attachments/20080607/a5de7c79/attachment-0002.html>

hi all, i`m looking for an postfix 2.1 rpm for CentOS 3 with TSL support. i tried the rpm form: http://ftp.wl0.org/official/2.1/RPMS-rhel3-i386/postfix-2.1.5-4.rhel3.i386.rpm but it doesn`t support tsl.

I'm trying to get Dovecot (dovecot-0.99.10-6) to work with Eudora (6.0 mac/win) and am having a real problem when I try to enable SSL, either TLS or alternate-port SSL. Although my other mail clients, mail.app, imp, etc. work just fine, either version of Eudora craps out when trying to connect via TLS or SSL -- on the mac I get the error Could not get mailbox list. 20 [CLOSED]

I have used Eudora since v 1.35 (circa '93). For quite some time, I have enjoyed keeping each of my mail accounts' folders in totally separate directory trees. In Eudora you do this by specifying the data locatoin as part of the startup: '<program location>/eudora.exe <data location>' So I am quite spoiled. But there is no Eudora support in Linux/CentOS. So

Hi folks, I'm new to WINE and have actually read the docs, so go easy on me. My machine is setup to dual boot between Red Hat 7.2 and Windows2000. This is what I get when I try to run Eudora 5.1 from my Win2k partition. This is as far it'll go--no window ever displays. I get identical results with either WINE 20020122 or a CVS snapshot from yesterday evening. Let me know if

Hi All, Anyone have any idea what could cause incoming calls on a SIP channel to no longer be able to use DTMF? DTMF on incoming calls on zaptel and on local SIP softphones and ATAs all work fine. Nothing gets registered in the CDR or on the console in verbose level 10, it just times out. I haven't changed anything on my part and can't get through to Viatalk tech support to ask them

I just upgraded from v0.9.9 to v0.9.32 (on Ubuntu 6.06) and Eudora Pro v4.2 stopped working. It no longer opens a mailbox when the icon is clicked. The log shows "fixme:rpc:alloc_serverprotoseq protseq "mswmsg" not supported" each time I click to open a mailbox. This was working on v0.9.9 so I am looking for ideas as to how to work around this problem. There is a bug

We are (only just) upgrading from Samba 1.9.18p10 to the latest 2.2.7a. We run Eudora 5.1 on our PC clients, which pick up their mail boxes from home directories on Solaris machines using samba shares. When we install the new Samba, all our Samba clients slow down incredibly. I suspect here is a change in the Samba config file requirements between the versions? Has anyone else already solved

Hello, I am running linux red hat 7.2 and still somewhat unfamiliar to its commands. I am administrator to an ISP with about 80 clients and would like to regulate the speed of uploads and downloads. I understand that I need to place everybody in different class''. Could I get help how to use tc/QBC to limit bandwith and impliment a u32 (or fwmark) filter that names mac

Hi, the email status problem that I reported for Dovecot 0.99.10.5 on June 3rd does still show up in 0.99.10.6. Quoting myself: (1) When new mail is delivered to the inbox, the last read mail(s) change(s) to "unread". Clients: Eudora 6 (Mac), Mozilla 1.6 (NetBSD, Linux, Win XP), MS Outlook. (2) When you attempt to move mails from the inbox to another folder with Mozilla (1.6 on

There seems to be a protocol mismatch between eudora and dovecot when using pop. The login interchange with, for example, mozilla, is as follows: MO: [connects] DC: +OK dovecot ready. MO: CAPA DC: +OK DC: CAPA DC: TOP DC: USER DC: UIDL DC: RESP-CODES DC: STLS DC: SASL PLAIN DC: . MO: USER yyy DC: +OK MO: PASS xxxxxxxx DC: +OK Logged in. But with eudora, with apparently equivalent

First off, thanks to the Wine team-- the 10/4 build is the closest to working well with Eudora I have had since the one I currently run, which was 1/12/01. Second, thanks to Lawson Whitney for sending me the socket patch so I could get the 10/4 build on the net! Now, Eudora Light 3.0.5 is running much better under the 10/4 build. A few little things are still wrong. Running just "wine

Has anyone been able to get Eudora Pro 5.x working with wine? I've got Red Hat 7.1, and I'm trying to get my Eudora Pro 5.0 running on my linux box, but so far, no luck. Thanks, David

I'm having major problems with the 10/4 Wine release. Currently the only thing I really use Wine for is Eudora Light 3.0.5. The most stable release for me thus far has been wine-20010112, which is what I'm using right now. Most of the releases since then have had window problems with Eudora-- messages having too much blank space, strange things. So I tried 1004, and it has a new

Are there plans to support ACL in Samba? -- Fong Vang SysAdmin