similar to: Ruby 1.8.2 or 1.8.4?

Ruby 1.8.4 from the c4 testing repo is doing fine so far. But now I need libdbi-ruby. I don't see that in any of my usual repos or in c4 testing and it does not seem to be rubygem'able. Any pointers? Thanks, Steve

Ok, no one has said it yet so I will. http://37signals.com/svn/archives2/bezos_expeditions_invests_in_37signals.php?102#comments How is this going to affect Rails? Or is it? -- Posted via http://www.ruby-forum.com/.

CentOS 4.2 (ruby-gems-0.8.11) cd ~ mkdir ruby-db cd ruby-db $ rails th-db Rails requires Ruby version 1.8.2 (2004-12-25) or later. You're running 1.8.1 (2003-12-25); please upgrade to continue. ;-( Am I going to have to use Fedora on this server to use rails? Craig

I am currently running Rails 1.0.0. I''d like to upgrade from Ruby 1.8.2 to Ruby 1.8.4 on Windows XP. Do I just download a tarball and unzip it into my Ruby install directory? Do I need to do anything to re-register my currently downloaded Gems? Thanks, Wes -- Posted via http://www.ruby-forum.com/.

Hi, What's the best (cleanest, easiest, whatever) way to install the proprietary NVidia driver on CentOS 5.5 ? Usually I'm using the RPMForge 3rd party repo and compile the odd missing package myself from a Fedora SRPM. But the nvidia packages look a bit like a mess. DKMS has errors in the startup script (looking for a nonexistent log_action_msg and the likes), so I wonder if it's

In early June, there was an update from freenx 0.4.x to 0.5.x in centosplus. It broke full screen mode for Linux clients. I am aware of the ctrl-alt-f workaround. But I have quite a few users at branch offices who depend on NX and with employee turnover and all, it has been a source of confusion for us. Has anyone come up with a fix so that fullscreen works without crtl-alt-f? I've

Hi! Previously i had ruby 1.8.2 (One-Click Ruby Installer) installed, but the rdoc and plugindoc didn''t work, so i decided to install ruby 1.8.4. I had uninstalled ruby 1.8.2 (uninstaller deleted the whole ruby folder with radrails and everything, just great) and installed One-Click Ruby Installer 1.8.4-16 preview3. Then installed rails, rmagick, radrails, created docs for trunk

Hello, Ruby-Lang.org mentions a safe level bypass vulnerability in Ruby 1.8.2 (http://www.ruby-lang.org/en/20051003.html). The Rails Web site suggests running Rails 1.1 under either 1.8.2 or 1.8.4. Is the security issue in 1.8.2 such that a Rails application wouldn''t expose it to the public? Or, for security reasons, should Rails apps (and any other publicly exposed usage of Ruby)

Is there some reason the ahci kernel module is *missing* from the 2.6.9-89.0.16.plus.c4 kernel? It is in the standard 2.6.9-89.0.16.EL kernel. Is this due to an oversight or is there some sort of conflict? I wanted to add IEEE1394 support to my system running CentOS 4.8. I *looks* like what I need to do is download the kernel SRPM and patch the config to include the IEEE1394 modules and

I would like to -- Posted via http://www.ruby-forum.com/.

Hi! The ruby installation on my FreeBSD-6 box have been upgraded from 1.8.2 to 1.8.4 by accident. And now all my rails have stopped working. I can''t produce any cool debug info since I have none. running script/ server just coredumps. Running the sites through apache isn''t an option since apache won''t start (get lots of these in my log: [Thu Feb 09 10:38:19

I''ve seen that Rails 1.1 is not reliable with Ruby 1.8.2 so you should upgrade to 1.8.4 I''m running ruby 1.8.3. What''s the story with it? Do I need to upgrade before I try Rails 1.1? Thanks Greg -- Greg Freemyer The Norcross Group Forensics for the 21st Century

Hi, Does anyone know how to correctly configure RadRails (0.7)? I can''t seem to get 0.7 version of radrails to create a Rails project. All I get is a blank project. I have ensured that my PATH does point to my ruby\bin area. Also any clarification regarding which directory (with an example) should be used for the following preferences setting (are they asking for a file or

Hi All, we've run into a problem with the xfs component in the centosplus kernel (2.6.9-34.106.unsupportedsmp) where synchronous writes sometimes fail with EAGAIN. It's causing headaches for DB2 installs and for our database research group. There is a fix reported at: http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=linux-xfs&m=110808122904352&w=2 ...that's supposed to take care of

Hi all, I have to develop a Ruby on Rails web application using Ruby 1.8.2. Could you inform me about what are the latest versions of Rails and RubyGems that should work with Ruby 1.8.2. I am also looking for some documentation that covers these versions. What I have found so far is that most of the examples that can be found in internet do not fully work on Ruby 1.8.2 and Rails 1.1.6 since they

I''ve seen some reports of problems with running Rails (version 1.0 here) on Ruby 1.8.3. Is this true across the board or just Mac OS? I''m setting up a Linux server and want to know if 1.8.3 is ok on that. Thanks, Jamie

hi there, I am about to embark on a mission critical financial web application, and was wondering weather ruby on rails is the best fit for this type of project. More specifically I am worried about floating point errors. Would it be more appropriate to use a more statically typed framework (.NET)? thankyou. -- Posted via http://www.ruby-forum.com/.

I have a new version of Rake that I''m (almost) ready to release. But before I make an official release, I would like some Rails folk to give it it try ... Why? Because it contains a workaround for the notorious Ruby 1.8.2 test/unit bug. Using this version of rails, it should be possible to unit test a rails app without patching the Ruby 1.8.2 test/unit library. Where to get it?

Does ruby 1.8.2 of ruby work with edge rails or do I need to upgrade? John Kopanas http://www.kopanas.com ===================================================================== http://www.soen.info - source of the freshest software engineering information on the net http://cusec.soen.info - software engineering conference

Hi, I have a client that insists on going with software rather than hardware raid1 to save a few dollars. Can Centos 4.2 do Boot and Root on software Raid1? I've heard criticisms of Grub and bootable RAID. Also, if it is not set up to work out of the box, I'd like to try to talk them out of it. I've been down that road before. If I go nonstandard, by the time I actually need