similar to: POP3 notice if password expired

I think the code is now stable enough to be called the first release candidate. Please report any bugs, new and old. The filesystem quota numbers should be correct now? http://dovecot.org/releases/dovecot-1.0.rc1.tar.gz http://dovecot.org/releases/dovecot-1.0.rc1.tar.gz.sig * PAM: If user's password is expired, give "Password expired" error message to the user. Now actually

I think the code is now stable enough to be called the first release candidate. Please report any bugs, new and old. The filesystem quota numbers should be correct now? http://dovecot.org/releases/dovecot-1.0.rc1.tar.gz http://dovecot.org/releases/dovecot-1.0.rc1.tar.gz.sig * PAM: If user's password is expired, give "Password expired" error message to the user. Now actually

Today I finally caught up with my mail. I've now read all the mails from the Dovecot list from this year and all my private mails from last few years (totaling around 500 unread mails). If you think there's still something I should have replied to, please re-send it because I've either missed it or just skipped it for some reason. (Except there are still a couple of mails from this

On Dec 12, 2013, at 04:25 , Gasiunas, Vaidas <vaidas.gasiunas at sap.com> wrote: > To address these requirements we have developed a set of patches improving performance and malfunction safety of certain compiler passes and would be interested in contributing them at some point. Before proposing concrete changes, we would like to know what the general interest is with respect to making

Hi Andy, > I would think you could use a simple allocation scheme on the host side and then allocate a single block (or perhaps one code block and one data block) in the target process to receive everything, since everything is loaded on the host before you need to copy it to the target process. But perhaps I'm missing something regarding your particular scenario. > In any event,

package logcheck-database tags 125794 pending tags 191637 pending thanks I've been running the latest version of qpopper from unstable for a few days and I've added the following rules to CVS: ^\w{3} [ :0-9]{11} [._[:alnum:]-]+ in.qpopper\[[0-9]+\]: connect from [._[:alnum:]-]+$ ^\w{3} [ :0-9]{11} [._[:alnum:]-]+ in.qpopper\[[0-9]+\]: \(v[.[:digit:]]+\) POP login by user

Hello, Philipp Becker and me, Vaidas Gasiunas, are developers at SAP and part of a team developing a C-like domain-specific language for the SAP HANA in-memory database. We use LLVM as a backend to translate our language to native code, primarily on x86-64 platforms. Our programs are created dynamically, compiled and optimized in a running database. As a result of that we have special

Dear list, I am planing to set up dovecot-imapd on my production-mail server which currently only runs pop3 via qpopper on debian-sarge. It would be best, if I could only use imapd and use the existing pop3- server (qpopper) as it is. Is this possible? Can the user both use pop3 (qpopper) and imapd (dovecot) in parallel then? Where does dovecot-imapd store its mails? Does it store its mail in

Hello, I'm attempting to move form qpopper 4.1 to Dovecot 2.2.5 on Linux. When a user checks POP mail qpopper seems to make a .username.pop temporary file in the same /var/mail directory as the mbox INBOX file. Watching what dovecot does I don't see this happening. Is this .pop file a lock file or just a temporary file? If its a temp file does dovecot do the same thing elsewhere?

Hi, I did some performance testing with dovecot and qpopper, if anyone is interested.. Hardware: Dual Xeon 2.8 with HT enabled (dmesg sees 4 cpu-s), 1 GB RAM, SCSI RAID 1 with 2x Maxtor Atlas 10K V disks. Software: CentOS 4.3, Qpopper 4.08 in standalone mode vs Dovecot 1.0-0_19.rc6, ext3 filesystem Mailbox format Mbox, tested Pop3 with PAM authentication My setup had 15 test users with 15

We have an older mail server using qpopper and the mbox format which we need to update to dovecot and maildir format. I have read through the docs on migrating from mbox to maildir, as well as a few nuggets on how to migrate from qpopper to dovecot, and I was wondering if I could get some suggestions on best practices for this specific migration. Would the built in dovecot conversion plugin be a

Hello, does anybody know how to make XUIDLs compatible to qpopper? I'm migrating from qpopper and one of my test-migration-accounts leaves the mail on the server. As soon as I switch to dovecot it downloads the mails again and again.. bye! Dominik

On 12/12/13 4:25 AM, Gasiunas, Vaidas wrote: > Hello, > > Philipp Becker and me, Vaidas Gasiunas, are developers at SAP and part of a team developing a C-like domain-specific language for the SAP HANA in-memory database. We use LLVM as a backend to translate our language to native code, primarily on x86-64 platforms. Our programs are created dynamically, compiled and optimized in a

Heya, We are in the process of migrating from qpopper to dovecot as POP3 server (and IMAP as well) and we hit the UIDL issue with dovecot. Qpopper uses its own algorithm to create UIDL values and if you set it up to write them down in the mbox file as X-UIDL, then dovecot can use them (pop_uidl_reuse = yes). But if you don't use that feature from qpopper, than X-UIDLs are missing and there

Qpopper has a compile time option '--enable-auto-delete Automatically delete downloaded msgs' Is there anything similar in dovecot. I'm trying to migrate from qpopper to dovecot any help is appreciated.

Hi all, I'm trying to get a feel for how many sites are using Dovecot and the size of the installation. Jonathan's query about big sites spurred my curiousity. I'd like to take an informal poll and will post results to the list. I'm interested in hearing from those of you who are using dovecot in a real-life/production type environment (not just testing). Please email me

Hi Philip, Thanks for the positive response from all of you! > One question: How are you handling EOM? Error return? Custom region allocator? When running into an Out-of-memory situation we're currently only doing an error return, i.e. the compilation fails, but does so without crashing the process in which the compilation/jitting occurs. It is ok for us if llvm returns with a

hi all, I am hoping to convert a 350K user qpopper installation using mbox to dovecot and maildir (pop3 only). many of the users "leave mail on server", and qpopper's UIDL format isn't (yet) supported by dovecot. since the UIDLs have been written by qpoppper to the existing mbox files (and will be preserved when the mboxes are converted to maildir) it would be possible to do

I'd like to revisit and old post if I may, will/does Dovecot support the old qpopper "Bulletin" ability? Basically I need a simple way of posting bulletins to all domain users. Qpopper maintained a bulletin db for each user and sent them the next bulletin in sequence. Thanks in advance Kevin

----- Original Message ----- > From: "Philipp Becker" <philipp.becker at sap.com> > To: "Philip Reames" <listmail at philipreames.com>, "LLVM Dev" <llvmdev at cs.uiuc.edu> > Sent: Friday, December 13, 2013 6:55:59 AM > Subject: Re: [LLVMdev] Making LLVM safer in out-of-memory situations > > Hi Philip, > > Thanks for the