similar to: Expunge is not expunging unless called twice--revisited

Dovecot is requiring two "expunge" calls before it deletes an email. It just seems to ignore the first expunge call, leaving the email file in the maildir cur/ folder. Any idea why? I even waited 10 seconds after setting the Deleted flag, but still the first expunge call did nothing.... 1 OK User logged in 2 select "INBOX" * FLAGS (\Answered \Flagged \Deleted \Seen

Hi all, Using Dovecot 1.0.3 on RedHat Enterprise 5 (kernel 2.6.18-8.1.6.el5PAE), and NFS storage, we symlinked a Maildir folder: /mailstore/user/Maildir/.Junk -> /junkstore/user/Junkmaildir Everything works fine, until we try to expunge, which produces: A04 NO BUG: Unknown internal error This only happens if "lazy_expunge" is enabled: mail_plugins = quota imap_quota acl

Hi! I noticed that this command ... : for USERNAME in ${USERS};do /usr/local/bin/doveadm -Dv expunge -u "${USERNAME}" mailbox sa.* SAVEDBEFORE 1d done ... does not expunge mails if ran from crontab. It shows in the Debug output what would have been done, but it doesn't really expunge those mails. This command runs daily, and every day the list of expunged mails (in the Debug

Hello, I have migrated my mailbox server from Dovecot 2.1.7 (Debian 7) to Dovecot 2.3.4 (Debian 10) and have a crontab setup in root to daily delete all mails in the INBOX of a specific user which are older than 90 days like this: /usr/bin/doveadm expunge -u username\@domain.com mailbox INBOX savedbefore 90d Unfortunately this does not work anymore. I also tried to run the command manually as

After updating our Samba4 server from alpha17 to beta8 "samba-tool dbcheck" shows 24 "incorrect GUID" errors. What does it mean and what should i do to fix this? Thx

On 21 March, 2018 - Aki Tuomi wrote: > Thank you for your thorough report, we'll look into it. Has anyone managed to reproduce this (using my transcript for example)? With mutt, I get this problem.. If I set 'imap_pipeline_depth=0' in .muttrc, I can't seem to reproduce it anymore. /Tomas -- Tomas Forsman, stric at cs.umu.se, http://people.cs.umu.se/stric/ `- SysAdmin at

Looks like the new mountpoint_get code broke the quota plugin. I am getting this error when trying to start dovecot, using last night's CVS on Red Hat ES3: # service dovecot start Starting Dovecot Imap: Edlopen(/usr/lib/dovecot/imap/lib01_quota_plugin.so) failed: /usr/lib/dovecot/imap/lib01_quota_plugin.so: undefined symbol: mountpoint_get Error: imap dump-capability process returned 22784

??????? Original Message ??????? On Tuesday, March 17, 2020 11:46 AM, Aki Tuomi <aki.tuomi at open-xchange.com> wrote: > Try`doveadm -Dv expunge -u username\\@domain.com mailbox INBOX savedbefore 90` > > It might give insight what goes wrong. Here would be the output but I still can't see where the problem is: Debug: Loading modules from directory: /usr/lib/dovecot/modules

After updating from Samba4 alpha 17 to beta8 most Windows start menu entries on our Windows 7 clients are in english now, instead of german. Also the desktop.ini files are not hidden anymore like it was before. What goes wrong here? Do i need to set a new parameter in smb.conf or mount the filesystem with some attributes? Thanks for help

Hello. I seem to have found a race condition, when setting flags on multiple emails rapidly. 5 commands including login to reproduce. Problem found using mutt in real world usage. Seems to happen both with UID STORE 1:3 and UID STORE 1,2,3 .. I have tried with the following packages, with a minimized config in a throwaway vm: https://packages.debian.org/stretch/dovecot-core Package:

Hi On 5 October 2012 21:25, <X-Dimension at gmx.net> wrote: > > -------- Original-Nachricht -------- >> Datum: Thu, 4 Oct 2012 12:22:54 +0200 >> Von: Michael Wood <esiotrot at gmail.com> >> An: Julian Timm <X-Dimension at gmx.net> >> CC: samba at lists.samba.org >> Betreff: Re: [Samba] Samba-tool dbcheck shows "incorrect GUID" after

http://dovecot.org/releases/1.1/beta/dovecot-1.1.beta8.tar.gz http://dovecot.org/releases/1.1/beta/dovecot-1.1.beta8.tar.gz.sig Changes since beta7: - Added a new "raw" mail storage backend which allows opening files/streams as single mail mailboxes. deliver uses this now instead of opening the incoming mail as a mbox. So deliver should be now faster and it doesn't anymore remove

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA512 This is for all versions from 1.0b3 - 1.0b8 All crash at the same place: Making all in auth gmake[3]: Entering directory `/src/mail/dovecot-1.0.beta8/src/auth' if gcc -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I. -I. -I../.. -I../../src/lib - -I../../src/lib-sql -I../../src/lib-settings -I../../src/lib-ntlm -

> On 17/03/2020 12:42 mabi <mabi at protonmail.ch> wrote: > > > Hello, > > I have migrated my mailbox server from Dovecot 2.1.7 (Debian 7) to Dovecot 2.3.4 (Debian 10) and have a crontab setup in root to daily delete all mails in the INBOX of a specific user which are older than 90 days like this: > > /usr/bin/doveadm expunge -u username\@domain.com mailbox INBOX

??????? Original Message ??????? On Tuesday, March 17, 2020 12:45 PM, Aki Tuomi <aki.tuomi at open-xchange.com> wrote: > `doveadm search -u username\\\\@domain.com mailbox INBOX savedbefore 90` > > return any mails? No it does not return any mails, although there are mails older than 90 days in the INBOX. > How did you do the migration? I copied over the mails with rsync

> On 17/03/2020 13:55 mabi <mabi at protonmail.ch> wrote: > > > ??????? Original Message ??????? > On Tuesday, March 17, 2020 12:45 PM, Aki Tuomi <aki.tuomi at open-xchange.com> wrote: > > > > `doveadm search -u username\\\\@domain.com mailbox INBOX savedbefore 90` > > > > return any mails? > > No it does not return any mails, although

??????? Original Message ??????? On Tuesday, March 17, 2020 1:05 PM, Aki Tuomi <aki.tuomi at open-xchange.com> wrote: > Did you add sufficient flags to rsync to retain file mtime and ctime? These are used to determine the mail saved date. > > Aki I have been using "rsync -av". As far as I know the "-a or --archive" parameter should preserve almost everything,

??????? Original Message ??????? On Tuesday, March 17, 2020 1:10 PM, mabi <mabi at protonmail.ch> wrote: > I have been using "rsync -av". As far as I know the "-a or --archive" parameter should preserve almost everything, at least the rsync man page says that. If that is of any help I did a "stat" on one of the oldest mails in that folder (mail from 17th

> On 17/03/2020 14:15 mabi <mabi at protonmail.ch> wrote: > > > ??????? Original Message ??????? > On Tuesday, March 17, 2020 1:10 PM, mabi <mabi at protonmail.ch> wrote: > > > I have been using "rsync -av". As far as I know the "-a or --archive" parameter should preserve almost everything, at least the rsync man page says that. >

??????? Original Message ??????? On Tuesday, March 17, 2020 1:19 PM, Aki Tuomi <aki.tuomi at open-xchange.com> wrote: > Can you try`doveadm fetch -u user date.saved UID mail-uid` To see if it matches this? How can I find out the "mail-uid" of this specific message? Is that the "Message-ID" header of that particular mail?