Displaying 20 results from an estimated 5000 matches similar to: "Effect of "login_process_per_connection = no"?"
2009 Dec 18
3
imap-login crashes after upgrade to Dovecot 1.2.8 Linux 64-bit
Hi all,
We moved our Dovecot installation first of all to have all folders and
inboxes on NetApps via NFS (with indexes local) then from a physical
Solaris 8 4-way UltraSparc server running Dovecot 1.2.5 (32-bit) to a
virtualised Ubuntu 8.04 64-bit server with a single virtual processor
(in VMWare ESX 3.5) running Dovecot 1.2.8 (64-bit).
Since the change, many of our users have experienced
2006 Oct 17
1
MBox path
Hi,
I'm having great difficulty pointing Dovecot to my MBox files. They are
all in /var/spool/mail/username as textfiles.. not directories.
So my guess was:
default_mail_env = /var/spool/mail/%u
Since %u is user. If the user is "server" I would expect it to go
to /var/spool/mail/server exactly what I want. But it
doesn't /var/spool/mail///home/server.
If I create the
2007 Feb 21
4
Solaris/SSLonly/Lots of Users
Anyone running Dovecot on Solaris, requiring only SSL connections, and
servicing thousands of simultaneous users? Our past attempts to do so
have failed due to dovecot-auth using up all 256 of its file descriptors.
I say 256 since we are limited to that by the 32-bit libraries.
We are looking at either compiling Dovecot in 64-bit and letting dovecot-auth
file descriptors accumulate (not ideal),
2006 Sep 22
1
Dovecot 1.0.rc7 ioloop-poll.c assertion failed after SIGHUP
Anybody else seen this one? We're running Dovecot 1.0.rc7 on a different
port on our live server (we're generally live with 1.0.beta5) and after
a HUP to reload the user database (in a passwd-file) this morning we got:-
> dovecot: Sep 22 07:45:05 Info: IMAP 14482 someuser xxx.xxx.xxx.xxx : Disconnected in IDLE
> dovecot: Sep 22 07:45:05 Warning: imap-login: SSL_read() syscall
2007 Nov 20
1
1.1.beta8 crashes with segfault when SIGHUP
Hello,
dovecot crashes when it receives -HUP signal. It happens always if there was
some activity - for example, if I start dovecot, check any account through
POP3 and then send -HUP to dovecot process, it crashes with the following log
entry:
segfault at 00000008 eip 0804d3fb esp bfdd3860 error 4
If there were no activity at all since starting, it does not crash.
my dovecot -n output:
#
2005 Mar 15
2
Read-only mail folders
Is it possible to have folders on read-only partitions in Dovecot
1.0-stable?
We have a NetApp fileserver which would probably be accessed via NFS
(though iSCSI is possible) and which stores readonly "snapshots" of
every directory accessible as .snapshot (but usually hidden from the
operating system). It would be very nice to set up a "snapshot"
namespace something like
2009 Jul 14
2
Index cache file problems in Dovecot 1.2.0
I've been seeing lots of index cache file errors (using mbox on Solaris
8 sparc 64-bit, but with 32-bit Dovecot) since I switched my account to
Dovecot 1.2.0 (we're still on 1.0.15 mostly, but I'm hoping to upgrade
to 1.1.17+ this summer, or 1.2.x if it's stable enough).
e.g.
Error: Corrupted index cache file
<path>/.imap/INBOX/dovecot.index.cache: field index too large (47
2008 Jun 19
3
Compile failure on Dovecot 1.1-rc12
I am getting this failure when trying to compile dovecot on Sparc Solaris 8:
make[4]: Entering directory
`/home/systems/looneytr/dovecot-1.1.rc12/src/lib'
source='str-find.c' object='str-find.o' libtool=no \
DEPDIR=.deps depmode=gcc /bin/bash ../../depcomp \
gcc -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I. -I../.. -I/usr/local/openssl/include -g
-O2 -Wall -W -Wmissing-prototypes
2005 May 05
1
1.0-stable loses flag changes sometimes?
I've been struggling with an odd bug in the latest 1.0-stable
(20050427) release. Sometimes Dovecot seems to forget that a message
has been read or deleted and marks it unread (or not deleted).
As far as I've been able to determine, it seems to happen when
1) There have been several recent deliveries
2) Possibly some of those deliveries are of multiple messages
3) Possibly they are read
2008 Jul 23
2
Dovecot 1.1.1 + zlib plugin + mbox crash
I've tried this on both Solaris 8 and SuSE Enterprise 9 (64-bit).
I get a assert-crash when using a gzipped mbox folder
. OK Logged in.
. SELECT test.gz
* FLAGS (\Answered \Flagged \Deleted \Seen \Draft $Label4 $Label2
$Label1 $Label3 $Label5)
* OK [PERMANENTFLAGS ()] Read-only mailbox.
* 167 EXISTS
* 0 RECENT
* OK [UNSEEN 2] First unseen.
* OK [UIDVALIDITY 1096038620] UIDs valid
* OK
2007 Mar 10
4
pre-1.0.rc27: Index and mbox fixes
I've been doing some stress testing in the last few days and fixing all
the errors I saw. I'm hoping that I've finally really fixed all the
index/mbox problems. So, again I think the only thing left for v1.0 is
the documentation. Please test this nightly snapshot before I'll release
rc27 tomorrow:
http://dovecot.org/nightly/dovecot-latest.tar.gz
If you've seen any of the
2006 Jun 06
1
Strange Error after some hour of inactivity.
Hi,
in near future planing migrate our E-mail server to new hardware.
Decided try dovecot as IMAP and POP3 server.
Compiled latest dovecot-1.0.beta8 version on Linux Fedora Core 3 machine (2.6 kernel).
Users database are on PostgreSQL server.
Everything working fine except some issues.
After some hour of inactivity (POP3 or IMAP) then connecting to check e-mail got this error:
invalid I/O fd 8,
2006 Jan 14
2
20060114 snapshot compilation warnings
Timo,
I've noticed a couple of extra compilation errors in last night's
snapshot compared to the snapshot I downloaded on Tuesday, probably due
to the int -> bool change :- (gcc 3.3.2 on Solaris 8)
mbox-sync.c: In function `mbox_sync':
mbox-sync.c:1568: warning: comparison is always false due to limited
range of data type
index-search.c: In function `search_index_arg':
2005 Mar 17
1
Namespaces and subscriptions
I've got a problem with subscriptions in 1.0-stable when migrating from
UW-IMAP.
I've modified the SUBSCRIPTION_FILE_NAME entries as suggested in the
Wiki http://wiki.dovecot.org/Migration and included the "~/mail/" etc.
hidden namespaces.
The .mailboxlist files contain entries like "~/mail/somefolder" and the
clients have "~/mail/" set as a prefix.
In
2006 Jan 17
0
SSL and login_process_per_connection = no
Just thought I'd check, but is the combination of SSL and
"login_process_per_connection = no" expected?
I'm wondering, because imap_login is doing the SSL-proxying, and in our
live Dovecot instance we have "login_process_per_connection = no" (we
had problems with authentication and running out of file descriptors
early on, now fixed by using userdb = passwd-file rather
2005 Mar 22
2
Address with whitespace shows as ""@MISSING_DOMAIN
It seems that Dovecot gets confused when presented with a header like:
From: someone at somewhere.org
i.e. with leading whitespace and no "friendly name"
This shows up as ""@MISSING_DOMAIN in clients, such as Pine, that
believe what Dovecot tells them rather than parsing the headers
themselves (e.g. Thunderbird).
Here's a sample IMAP session:
xyz FETCH 728 ENVELOPE
2005 May 27
2
imap disconnects on my account only
Talk about personal problems!
I am using dovecot-0.99.13-4.FC2, and everything has been going fine
for months. Earlier this afternoon, Thunderbird's status pane would
say 'Sending authenticate login information...' and I would no longer
receive email.
When I checked with others, they were fine and dandy.
I tried kmail, evolution, and even tried webmail. All had connection errors.
2005 Sep 21
1
Another address-spec problem
I've had complaints from users about "MISSING_DOMAIN" in header fields
and I've tracked it down to having "." in an unquoted display name.
By my reading of RFC2822 (especially section 4.1)
A N Other <a.n.other at somewhere.org>
"A. N. Other" <a.n.other at somewhere.org>
are legal, but
A. N. Other <a.n.other at somewhere.org>
is
2007 Oct 29
1
How to test combined effects?
Suppose I have a mixed-effects model where yij is the jth sample for
the ith subject:
yij= beta0 + beta1(age) + beta2(age^2) + beta3(age^3) + beta4(IQ) +
beta5(IQ^2) + beta6(age*IQ) + beta7(age^2*IQ) + beta8(age^3 *IQ)
+random intercepti + eij
In R how can I get an F test against the null hypothesis of
beta6=beta7=beta8=0? In SAS I can run something like contrast age*IQ
1,
2005 Jun 14
3
dovecot.index.cache 1/3rd of INBOX size
I've noticed that my dovecot.index.cache file has got very large (24MB,
which is more than 1/3 of my INBOX size). I've tried deleting (well,
renaming) the dovecot.index.* files, and re-opening my INBOX, and the
new dovecot.index.cache is only 90KB so far.
I'm using dovecot-1.0-stable and mbox format. My mail_cache_fields and
mail_never_cache_fields are set to the default.
Looking