similar to: beta7: TLS, Success!!

Displaying 20 results from an estimated 30000 matches similar to: "beta7: TLS, Success!!"

2006 Apr 20
0
beta7: assert, Solaris 9
Hi, An assertion that I haven't seen before: Apr 20 11:15:32 emerald dovecot: [ID 107833 mail.error] IMAP(user): file mbox-sync-rewrite.c: line 106 (mbox_sync_headers_add_space): assertion failed: (start_pos < data_size) gdb output from the core file of imap is attached. My setup: Solaris 9, mbox format, INBOX is NFS mounted from a Solaris 10 system, imap and imaps only. Jeff Earickson
2006 May 02
0
beta7 imap core, no assert
Timo, I noticed this core dump from imap the other day from one of our users; there was no assertion. GDB output attached, I have saved the core if you need more information. Jeff Earickson Colby College -------------- next part -------------- Script started on Tue May 02 09:15:48 2006 %gdb imap core.jloo GNU gdb 6.3 Copyright 2004 Free Software Foundation, Inc. GDB is free software, covered
2007 Mar 02
2
rc25: need_space assert, core
Timo, I see where at least one other person reported this, but here goes. I went from rc24 to rc25 this morning, and I got an assert and core from my own mailbox withing five minutes: Mar 2 06:52:26 karst dovecot: [ID 107833 mail.error] IMAP(jaearick): file mbox-sync-rewrite.c: line 408: assertion failed: (need_space == (uoff_t)-mails[idx].space) Mar 2 06:52:26 karst dovecot: [ID 107833
2007 Apr 06
2
mbox sync/lock issue, rc28 and later
Help! I just noticed this error this morning, we have been getting a lot of these in rc28 and rc29, not in rc27 or before: Apr 6 07:22:52 karst dovecot: [ID 107833 mail.error] IMAP(jaearick): mbox file /var/mail/j/jaearick was modified while we were syncing, check your locking settings Pine coughed up an internal error, no core dump, and dovecot basically doubled the size of my mailbox by
2005 Dec 17
1
Re: dovecot Digest, Vol 32, Issue 42
If its too hard for them to setup the pop3 catch all, we can probably put some mapping in place to smtp froward mail to their server. This is more complex on our part so would prefer not to do it that way, but its an option and will require not setup on their part other than make sure their server does not accept mail for anyone other than our server. dovecot-request@dovecot.org wrote: >
2006 Jan 19
1
beta1: how to use quota plugin???
Hi, After searching gmane.mail.imap.dovecot on the topic, and wiki.dovecot.org, I'm still clueless on how to use RFC 2087 quotas in dovecot with the quota plugin. How come no wiki doc? My setup: Solaris 9, mbox format. Both the filesystem for INBOXes (/var/mail) and the user's home directories have filesystem-based quotas imposed. For example: % quota -v joeblow Disk quotas for
2006 May 14
2
beta8: complaint about tilde at startup
Timo, After installing beta8 on Solaris 10 sparc and starting it for the first time, I noticed this in my syslog: May 14 19:35:45 emerald dovecot: [ID 475045 mail.info] Dovecot v1.0.beta8 starting up May 14 19:35:47 emerald dovecot: [ID 536776 mail.error] stat(~) failed: No such file or directory The only appearance of the tilde (~) in my dovecot.conf is here: default_mail_env =
2005 Aug 16
2
test80: assert/core debug info
Timo, Attached is gdb information from core dumps related to the following assert in test-80: IMAP(username): file mbox-sync-update.c: line 442 (mbox_sync_update_header_from): assertion failed: (ctx->mail.uid == 0 || ctx->mail.uid_broken || ctx->mail.uid == mail->uid) My setup: Solaris 9, mbox format. test-80 compiled with gcc 4.0.1 using the following configure options: CC=gcc
2007 Mar 19
1
rc27 assert, mbox format
Timo, After several days of flawless work, rc27 gave an assert/core yesterday: Mar 19 00:10:46 karst dovecot: [ID 107833 mail.error] IMAP(user): file mbox-sync-rewrite.c: line 423: assertion failed: (need_space == (uoff_t)-mails[idx].space) Mar 19 00:10:46 karst dovecot: [ID 107833 mail.error] IMAP(user): Raw backtrace: 0x8a51c -> 0x473f4 -> 0x479b0 -> 0x41c50 -> 0x42430 ->
2007 Jan 25
2
rc18->rc19: read/unread/reply flags broken
Timo, This might be a bit vague, but I have noticed that rc19 seems to have broken the read/unread/reply flags in imap. My officemate has had problems with messages that are read and marked as read then mysteriously get remarked as unread the next time email is checked. I've had problems where I reply to a message and it does not get marked as "answered". We didn't see this
2006 Apr 03
1
hard quota example, 1.0b3
Timo, Here's an example of the filesystem quota issue: A user was near his hard filesystem quota, so he moved some junk to his Trash folder to clear disk space. He got the following error on his IMAP client: "Internal error occurred. Refer to server log for more information. {2006-04033 11:08:44]". My setup: Solaris 9, beta3 (soon going to beta4), mbox format, IMAP only.
2005 Aug 16
0
test80: in production, occasional assert
Timo, Test-80, running on our production IMAP server. Setup: Solaris 9, compiled with gcc 4.0.1, mbox format, configured like so: VERSION=test80 CC=gcc CFLAGS="-g -O" CPPFLAGS=-I/opt/openssl/include LDFLAGS=-L/opt/openssl/lib \ ./configure --prefix=/opt/dovecot.$VERSION --with-ssl=openssl \ --with-ssldir=/opt/openssl/ssl --with-rawlog --enable-debug > configure.out Still seeing
2005 Sep 05
2
1.0alpha1: too many open files
Help... Dovecot 1.0alpha1 hung up today with nothing working and the following spewing to my syslog: pipe() failed: Too many open files My setup: Solaris 9, just using imap, mbox format. The various "max" settings in dovecot.conf use the defaults. Suggestions on what to change in fovecot.conf to keep this from happening? Jeff Earickson Colby College
2005 Jul 05
1
dovecot 1 for production? which one?
Hi, I've been lurking on the list since Spring, planning to replace UW-IMAP with dovecot 1.0 sometime this summer. The recent thread on "1.0" has not given me a good feeling about seeing it before summer's end. So I wonder if I should use dovecot-1.0-test-xx code or dovecot-stable-[date] code (which seems to change every day, how stable is that???). This is confusing,
2006 Jan 24
0
1.0beta2: mbox_sync assert
Timo, My first assert in beta2. Syslog said: Jan 24 09:57:16 emerald dovecot: [ID 107833 mail.error] imap(user): Cached message offset 94625 is invalid for mbox file /var/mail/m/user Jan 24 09:57:16 emerald dovecot: [ID 107833 mail.error] imap(user): file mbox-sync.c: line 1471 (mbox_sync_do): assertion failed: (!sync_ctx->mbox->mbox_sync_dirty || (flags & MBOX_SYNC_UNDIRTY) == 0) Gdb
2002 May 20
1
patch for bug 245?
Hi, Has a patch against 3.2.2p1 been posted for bug 245, the bug that gives the following syslog complaint? open /dev/tty failed - could not set controlling tty: No such device or address I hit this when upgrading from 3.1p1, solaris 8, using Sun Forte 6 C compiler. I would get authenticated at login, but my shell would never get going. I had to roll back to 3.1p1. ** Jeff A. Earickson,
2005 Dec 14
2
1.0alpha5: fcntl() locking problem
Hi, My setup: Solaris 9, /var/mail is NFS mounted from another Solaris 9 box, home directories and dovecot index stuff is on local ufs filesystems. I upgraded from alpha4 to a5 about 36 hours ago. Dovecot is configured like so during the build: VERSION=1.0.alpha5 CC=gcc CFLAGS="-g -O" CPPFLAGS=-I/opt/openssl/include LDFLAGS=-L/opt/openssl/lib \ ./configure
2005 Oct 24
0
1.0alpha4: drowning in asserts/cores
Timo, I have had to drop back to alpha3 because I found a pile of core files on my imap server this morning, from the weekend. They are all from the assert: imap(user): file mbox-lock.c: line 379 (mbox_lock_fcntl): assertion failed: (lock_type == F_UNLCK) I reported this issue to the list last Friday. Help... Jeff Earickson Colby College
2005 Aug 29
1
dovecot/Active Directory/KRB client (OT)
Gang, For those who asked about making a Solaris system a Kerberos client to Active Directory, the magic document to have is: http://www.connectathon.org/seam1.0/files/c0101.htm See the section "How to Configure a SEAM Client Using a Windows 2000 KDC". SEAM was Sun's Kerberos client stuff in Solaris 8; it is just there as part of Solaris 9 and 10. These instructions apply if
2006 Nov 20
2
rc14 and rc15 performance issues
Hi, I am stuck at rc13 because rc14 and rc15 have both failed to keep up with imap connections on my (slow old) system. I have the problem where if a lot of people check their email at once (like at the top of the hour) then my load goes way up and things slow to a crawl. My setup: Solaris 10 on an E220R, mbox format, imap and imaps only. I also use "login_process_per_connection =