similar to: strip domains]

I saw some discussion on this from the middle of last year. Looking through the archives, there didn't seem to be a full solution using a standard dovecot configuration. Did this issue get resolved within dovecot? Will it strip domains from the login presented by the customer. I currently am using dovecot for imap with a webmail system (I strip the domain there before it hits dovecot), but

Timo Sirainen <tss at iki.fi> Wrote: > On Mon, 2010-09-06 at 14:26 +0100, Alan Brown wrote: > > Is there any way of enforcing a Maildir per-folder message limit in > > Dovecot? > No. Would you consider it as a feature request? > > We're finding major performance hits once a threshold of files/directory > > is exceeded. This applies across all

I'm trying to use this to test an IMAP server I'm developing (I picked the nightly up from the link on the wiki page at http://www.imapwiki.org/ImapTest/Installation). With one client using the mailbox dovecot-crlf (http://www.dovecot.org/tmp/dovecot-crlf) I get messages like: Error: test at npsl.co.uk[67]: 1035253882.5041.34.camel at hurina: Header From changed 'Timo Sirainen

Hello, Running FC5 x86_64 with dovecot-1.0-0_8.beta3.rhfc5.at Using system user/passwds for 99.99% of users...have sql user/pass enabled to test virtual users from mysql. How do I strip off the domain when users provide user at domain.com so that my userdb and passdb use just 'user'? (disregarding sql auth...I'm not concerned with that right now). My dovecot.conf auth config:

On 23/06/15 13:10, Steffen Kaiser wrote: > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- > Hash: SHA1 > > On Tue, 23 Jun 2015, lejeczek wrote: >> On 23/06/15 09:32, Steffen Kaiser wrote: >>> On Mon, 22 Jun 2015, lejeczek wrote: >>>> On 22/06/15 09:43, Steffen Kaiser wrote: >>>>> On Mon, 22 Jun 2015, lejeczek wrote: >>>>>> On 22/06/15

On Thu, Nov 24, 2016 at 9:10 PM, Mark Moseley <moseleymark at gmail.com> wrote: > On Thu, Nov 24, 2016 at 10:52 AM, Timo Sirainen <tss at iki.fi> wrote: > >> On 24 Nov 2016, at 9.33, Mark Moseley <moseleymark at gmail.com> wrote: >> > >> > On Wed, Nov 23, 2016 at 6:05 PM, Timo Sirainen <tss at iki.fi> wrote: >> > >> >> On

Dear Tim Schafer, Take a look at my sample dovecot-ldap.conf hosts = localhost dn = cn=root,dc=ceylonlinux,dc=com dnpass = secret ldap_version = 3 base = dc=ceylonlinux,dc=com deref = never scope = subtree user_attrs = mail,homeDirectory=mailMessageStore,uidNumber=1003,gidNumber=1003 user_filter = (&(objectClass=user)(mail=%u)) pass_attrs = mail=user,userPassword=password pass_filter =

Hello. What's the proper way to remove *all symbols* from ELF binaries when building packages with rpmbuild on CentOS? Seems that an out of the box rpmbuild install only discards debugging symbols (strip -g). That's the default configuration for %__os_install_post on CentOS, the step in charge on stripping binaries: $ rpmbuild --showrc (..) -14: __os_install_post

>From 2.6.2's Makefile: install: all ... ${INSTALLCMD} ${STRIP} -m 755 rsync$(EXEEXT) ${DESTDIR}${bindir} ... install-strip: $(MAKE) STRIP='-s' install This doesn't work (at least) on OpenBSD, because install(1) there will use the value of the environment variable STRIP as the command to run for stripping the executable. Renaming the variable will take care of this. ---

my monthly archive script does: echo `date` start ${i} doveadm mailbox create \#ARCHIVE/${YEAR_LAST_MONTH}/${i} doveadm -f tab mailbox status messages ${i} doveadm move \#ARCHIVE/${YEAR_LAST_MONTH}/${i} mailbox \ ${i} BEFORE ${TODAY} SINCE ${FIRST_LAST_MONTH} doveadm -f tab mailbox status messages ${i} echo `date` done ${i} for each mailbox that has >= 1 message in

Dear all, I'm routinely using lattice and ggplot2, I wish to create a lattice theme that looks not too dissimilar to ggplot's defaults so I can include both graphs in a document with a consistent look. To illustrate my questions, consider the following example: > library(ggplot2) > library(lattice) > > # example data > x <- seq(0, 10, len = 100) > y1 <-

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 On Tue, 23 Jun 2015, lejeczek wrote: > On 23/06/15 09:32, Steffen Kaiser wrote: >> On Mon, 22 Jun 2015, lejeczek wrote: >>> On 22/06/15 09:43, Steffen Kaiser wrote: >>>> On Mon, 22 Jun 2015, lejeczek wrote: >>>>> On 22/06/15 09:16, lejeczek wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>> to=<me

jos ldflags laittaa -static vivun niin se preferoi .a filedn linkkausta. ---Aki TuomiDovecot oy -------- Original message --------From: Timo Sirainen <tss at iki.fi> Date: 05/02/2017 20:19 (GMT+02:00) To: Dovecot Mailing List <dovecot at dovecot.org> Subject: Re: Panic error from dovecot 2.2.27 using libressl 2.4.5 (cross-posting at GitHub) On 5 Feb 2017, at 19.58, Timo Sirainen

Sorry for finnish. I think it might also work with libtool flag -static in Makefile.am LDADD flags.---Aki TuomiDovecot oy -------- Original message --------From: Aki Tuomi <aki.tuomi at dovecot.fi> Date: 05/02/2017 20:21 (GMT+02:00) To: Dovecot Mailing List <dovecot at dovecot.org> Subject: Re: Panic error from dovecot 2.2.27 using libressl 2.4.5 (cross-posting at GitHub) jos

Hi, is there a newer public key available? root at dc:/usr/local/src# gpg --verify dovecot-2.2.29.1.tar.gz.sig dovecot-2.2.29.1.tar.gz gpg: Signature made Wed 12 Apr 2017 12:40:03 PM CEST using DSA key ID 40558AC9 gpg: Can't check signature: public key not found root at dc:/usr/local/src# gpg --search-keys 40558AC9 gpg: searching for "40558AC9" from hkp server keys.gnupg.net (1)

On 19 Sep 2018, at 11.42, Timo Sirainen <tss at iki.fi> wrote: > > On 19 Sep 2018, at 11.30, Timo Sirainen <tss at iki.fi <mailto:tss at iki.fi>> wrote: >> >>> >>> On 19 Sep 2018, at 11.11, Simone Lazzaris <s.lazzaris at interactive.eu <mailto:s.lazzaris at interactive.eu>> wrote: >>> >>> In data mercoled? 19

On Tue, Jun 20, 2017 at 12:45 PM, Timo Sirainen <tss at iki.fi> wrote: > https://dovecot.org/releases/2.2/rc/dovecot-2.2.31.rc1.tar.gz > https://dovecot.org/releases/2.2/rc/dovecot-2.2.31.rc1.tar.gz.sig > > Unless new bugs are found, this will be the final v2.2.31 release, which > will be released on Monday. > > * LMTP: Removed "(Dovecot)" from added Received

On 2019-06-10 20:39, @lbutlr via dovecot wrote: > Is is possible (I?m sure it is, so how) to strip multipart messages > that are HTML and text of the HTML portion and leave the bare text > message without also stripping other parts (like images or attached > files). > > Or also to take messages that are only HTML and strip the HTML and > replace it with a plain text version?

Is is possible (I?m sure it is, so how) to strip multipart messages that are HTML and text of the HTML portion and leave the bare text message without also stripping other parts (like images or attached files). Or also to take messages that are only HTML and strip the HTML and replace it with a plain text version? I used to do this a long time ago with procmail and lynx, but it was never

Since you have confirmed that someone else you know is using it on FreeBSD+ZFS without these problems, have you tried asking on the FreeBSD support list(s)? Seems like that may be your best bet, since it is certainly not a generic dovecot problem (but may indeed be one or more of the settings you are using)... You could also go ahead and post the diff of your config and your friends (I'm