similar to: VERY cool add-on request.

Hi I know i might get flamed for asking this in the dovecot mailing list instead of the spamassassin one but i thought someone might be kind enough to help anyway. TIA I'm trying to do site-wide spam filtering with a public namespace but it's not reading the folder i have in the public namespace This is the public namespace set in my dovecot.conf #public spam folder namespace public

I don't use the Anti-Spam plugin; I just fire off a BASH script every four hours with crontab which iterates thru the vmail email accounts and trains Spamassassin 'per-user' accounts. If the script sounds interesting I can post it here. It probably could use a little polish though. Bill On 11/9/2016 6:49 PM, Ben Johnson wrote: > On 11/5/2016 1:22 PM, Larry Rosenman wrote:

what anti-spam for you used ? dspam?spammassian? amavisd-new ? what is best ?

Hi! Since antispam plugin is deprecated and we would really prefer people not to use it, we wrote instructions on how to replace it with IMAPSieve. Comments and suggestions are most welcome. https://wiki.dovecot.org/HowTo/AntispamWithSieve --- Aki Tuomi Dovecot oy

Hi Steve, MTA = Postfix I have amavis - spamassassin - dspam installed. i think spamassassin scnas after dspam, cuase in the mail headers dspam comes at first. I use Dovecot as Imap Server OS = Gentoo Linux i put the config of dspam here = http://rafb.net/p/VCX8XO97.html if u need more confs just tell me , i can paste then marko Steve schrieb: > Hallo Marko > > This is not

Hello, This is not specifically a dovecot issue, but to it's antispam plugin, that being the case if private responses are deemed so please do so. I've got a Postfix, amavisd-new, dovecot (delivery and sieve), setup with spamassassin. It's for the most part working fine, here's the problem, false positives and false negatives. The sieve moves spamassassin-tagged messages in to

Hi everyone, I've been thinking of phasing out my spamassassin installation (it's hardly doing me any good these days) in favour of dspam. Now since I'm working on this anyway, I thought I'd configure it so when users get any spam, it is delivered into a special folder. I figure I need the 1.0 test series for this, so I can make that folder fixed. But, I also want to allow

Hi, Can I get a look at your antispam configs? I'd like to compare them against mine. Thanks. Dave. On 1/26/15, Steffen Kaiser <skdovecot at smail.inf.fh-brs.de> wrote: > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- > Hash: SHA1 > > On Sun, 25 Jan 2015, David Mehler wrote: > >> I've got a Postfix, amavisd-new, dovecot (delivery and sieve), setup >> with

Hi, I recently installed an IMAP server with dovecot and the dovecot antispam plugin with dspam backend. If I configure dspam to not include the signature in the X-DSPAM-Signature header will I be able to move mail into SPAM folder? Regards, Isabel

I'm trying to use the dovecot antispam plugin with dspam. I'm running dovecot 1.1.2. Using thunderbird and IMAP, when I drag a spam message from the inbox into the SPAM folder, I get a popup saying "The current command did not succeed. The mail server responded: antispam signature not found. When I look at the message in the maildir folder, I see the dspam signature both in the

Sparked from the discussion on the list, I've put my antispam plugin into git and split up the code into a frontend and possibly multiple backends. See http://git.sipsolutions.net/dovecot-antispam.git/ (URL functions as both gitweb and git URL) Andreas, I took your README file and adjusted it, I hope you don't mind. I didn't fork from your git tree because you'd already

Am 26.01.2015 um 10:52 schrieb St?phane Cottin: >> Le 26 janv. 2015 ? 10:09, Reindl Harald <h.reindl at thelounge.net> a ?crit : >>>> You're stilling going to lose contents. If dspam fails, the mail >>>> is dumped, the LDA returns exit code 75, and the MTA will probably >>>> issue a bounce Email to the sender. >>> >>> which

Hi, Some email clients, like Evolution, use IMAP keywords to flag spam instead of moving mail to dedicated spam mailbox. This is very useful, as false positives can be easily "moved" to original mailbox simply by removing $Junk keyword. I couldn't find a way how to integrate antispam software, like dspam, with dovecot, so that antispam automatically learns ham/spam. I have found

Den 12. feb. 2017 21:44, skrev ebroch at whitehorsetc.com: > > > Any opinion on dspam's interoperability with this? > > Just follow the wiki and replace sa-learn scripts with calling dspam. Dspam direct pipe needs mail-line-endings (\r\n) translated into unix line-endings (\r). like so: ----- learn-spam.sh --------- #!/bin/sh sed -e 's/\r$//' | /usr/bin/dspam

Hello I have recently had to rebuild my email server, it is a small server for my various email accounts and I also host the email for a clients business. Switched to Dovecot from Courier many years ago, and it has been a very reliable solution With the new rebuild I have updated it to Dovecot 2.2.33.2 with PigeonHole 4.21, it runs DSpam 3.10.2 to scan and tag all incoming mails as Spam or

As I hijacked a thread... I thought I'd start this new one. Yes, shame on me. Karanbir Singh wrote: > John Hinton wrote: >> As a side, I could see blossoming a Wiki area specific to email which might >> eventually fill out to an extremely robust set of how to's for installations >> of what amounts to being some of the very hardest things that I've >>

As I hijacked a thread... I thought I'd start this new one. Yes, shame on me. Karanbir Singh wrote: > John Hinton wrote: >> As a side, I could see blossoming a Wiki area specific to email which might >> eventually fill out to an extremely robust set of how to's for installations >> of what amounts to being some of the very hardest things that I've >>

Am 26.01.2015 um 08:52 schrieb Steffen Kaiser: > On Sun, 25 Jan 2015, Joseph Tam wrote: >> St?phane Cottin writes: > >>> dspam already send errors to syslog, the point here is to never loose >>> email contents. This was a wrong design, i'm now use a wrapper instead >>> ( see my previous post for details ). > >> You're stilling going to lose

I was wondering if anyone has done something like this, or knows of any reason it would not work. Would it be possible to use dovecot's API to create virtual folders where when messages are placed in them some other application can be executed on them? With programs like DSPAM and SpamAssassin, and with users who do not have shell access to the machines, it would be nice if there was a

On 1/24/19 10:07 AM, Per Jessen wrote: > > Sorry, I misunderstood. > > I rely on spamassasssin to deal with spam. > > > /Per > > You still led me to the correct solution. I use dspam. Occassionally some odd spams get through. Usually they are using this date trick (not that it fools dspam). The problem is the content is novel. So, I am using this to catch what cannot be