Displaying 20 results from an estimated 3000 matches similar to: "SSL and login_process_per_connection = no"
2006 Jan 24
1
Fwd: Weird problem opening mbox in beta1/2
Hmm, this is peculiar!
This mailbox has been unchanged on my test server since September. I've
been using it to test each new version of Dovecot just after I've
compiled it.
When beta1 was released, I opened this mbox with no problems. However,
when I upgraded to beta2, I got "file size unexpectedly shrinked in mbox
file /export/mail/a/24/vis99003/INBOX (16895967 vs 16899267)".
2009 Dec 18
3
imap-login crashes after upgrade to Dovecot 1.2.8 Linux 64-bit
Hi all,
We moved our Dovecot installation first of all to have all folders and
inboxes on NetApps via NFS (with indexes local) then from a physical
Solaris 8 4-way UltraSparc server running Dovecot 1.2.5 (32-bit) to a
virtualised Ubuntu 8.04 64-bit server with a single virtual processor
(in VMWare ESX 3.5) running Dovecot 1.2.8 (64-bit).
Since the change, many of our users have experienced
2008 Jul 23
2
Dovecot 1.1.1 + zlib plugin + mbox crash
I've tried this on both Solaris 8 and SuSE Enterprise 9 (64-bit).
I get a assert-crash when using a gzipped mbox folder
. OK Logged in.
. SELECT test.gz
* FLAGS (\Answered \Flagged \Deleted \Seen \Draft $Label4 $Label2
$Label1 $Label3 $Label5)
* OK [PERMANENTFLAGS ()] Read-only mailbox.
* 167 EXISTS
* 0 RECENT
* OK [UNSEEN 2] First unseen.
* OK [UIDVALIDITY 1096038620] UIDs valid
* OK
2005 Mar 22
2
Address with whitespace shows as ""@MISSING_DOMAIN
It seems that Dovecot gets confused when presented with a header like:
From: someone at somewhere.org
i.e. with leading whitespace and no "friendly name"
This shows up as ""@MISSING_DOMAIN in clients, such as Pine, that
believe what Dovecot tells them rather than parsing the headers
themselves (e.g. Thunderbird).
Here's a sample IMAP session:
xyz FETCH 728 ENVELOPE
2006 Jan 14
2
20060114 snapshot compilation warnings
Timo,
I've noticed a couple of extra compilation errors in last night's
snapshot compared to the snapshot I downloaded on Tuesday, probably due
to the int -> bool change :- (gcc 3.3.2 on Solaris 8)
mbox-sync.c: In function `mbox_sync':
mbox-sync.c:1568: warning: comparison is always false due to limited
range of data type
index-search.c: In function `search_index_arg':
2005 Mar 17
1
Namespaces and subscriptions
I've got a problem with subscriptions in 1.0-stable when migrating from
UW-IMAP.
I've modified the SUBSCRIPTION_FILE_NAME entries as suggested in the
Wiki http://wiki.dovecot.org/Migration and included the "~/mail/" etc.
hidden namespaces.
The .mailboxlist files contain entries like "~/mail/somefolder" and the
clients have "~/mail/" set as a prefix.
In
2005 Sep 21
1
Another address-spec problem
I've had complaints from users about "MISSING_DOMAIN" in header fields
and I've tracked it down to having "." in an unquoted display name.
By my reading of RFC2822 (especially section 4.1)
A N Other <a.n.other at somewhere.org>
"A. N. Other" <a.n.other at somewhere.org>
are legal, but
A. N. Other <a.n.other at somewhere.org>
is
2005 Jul 14
0
[Fwd: Re: Dovecot and ActiveDirectory]
Oops! Thought I'd CC'd this to the list. Sorry, Oliver!
Chris
-------- Original Message --------
Date: Wed, 13 Jul 2005 20:09:35 +0100
From: Chris Wakelin <c.d.wakelin at reading.ac.uk>
To: Jeroen Scheerder <Jeroen.Scheerder at phil.uu.nl>
CC: Chris Wakelin <c.d.wakelin at reading.ac.uk>
Subject: Re: [Dovecot] Dovecot and ActiveDirectory
Jeroen Scheerder wrote:
>
2005 Nov 03
0
FW: How to log POP3 events
Ok, I think I have that figured out.
I made the following mods:
disable_plaintext_auth = no
pop3_uidl_format = %08Xu%08Xv
and it seems to work.
Now...about those enhanced logging capabilities. As promised, I see the
enhanced logging.
What does TOP and RETR mean? (I checked the manual first)
Cliff
-----Original Message-----
From: Cliff Hayes [mailto:chayes at afo.net]
Sent: Thursday,
2006 Sep 22
1
Dovecot 1.0.rc7 ioloop-poll.c assertion failed after SIGHUP
Anybody else seen this one? We're running Dovecot 1.0.rc7 on a different
port on our live server (we're generally live with 1.0.beta5) and after
a HUP to reload the user database (in a passwd-file) this morning we got:-
> dovecot: Sep 22 07:45:05 Info: IMAP 14482 someuser xxx.xxx.xxx.xxx : Disconnected in IDLE
> dovecot: Sep 22 07:45:05 Warning: imap-login: SSL_read() syscall
2005 Apr 20
3
Why is "UIDVALIDITY changed" fatal?
I've got several users testing Dovecot IMAP at the moment, but some of
them are also accessing their mail via UW-IMAP at other times. (I've
warned them about accessing the same folder simultaneously via
UW-IMAP and Dovecot!) In addition, we have special folders "AutoSpam"
and "Trash" that pruned using Washington's "mailutil" automatically
every so
2005 May 05
1
1.0-stable loses flag changes sometimes?
I've been struggling with an odd bug in the latest 1.0-stable
(20050427) release. Sometimes Dovecot seems to forget that a message
has been read or deleted and marks it unread (or not deleted).
As far as I've been able to determine, it seems to happen when
1) There have been several recent deliveries
2) Possibly some of those deliveries are of multiple messages
3) Possibly they are read
2005 Mar 15
2
Read-only mail folders
Is it possible to have folders on read-only partitions in Dovecot
1.0-stable?
We have a NetApp fileserver which would probably be accessed via NFS
(though iSCSI is possible) and which stores readonly "snapshots" of
every directory accessible as .snapshot (but usually hidden from the
operating system). It would be very nice to set up a "snapshot"
namespace something like
2005 Sep 27
2
How safe is mbox_very_dirty_syncs?
I've tried turning on mbox_very_dirty_syncs for myself (and a few other
brave souls running 1.0-alpha3 rather than 1.0-stable) again to see what
perfomance gain it gives (see thread
http://www.dovecot.org/list/dovecot/2005-July/007956.html).
Now we aren't running UW-IMAP at all, how safe is mbox_very_dirty_syncs
assuming the only other process writing to mailboxes is our MTA (exim)
which
2005 Mar 15
1
Authentication to Active Directory
Has anybody managed to have Dovecot authenticate to Microsoft Active
Directory?
I've tried to get it to work using LDAP and the following settings
dovecot.conf:
userdb = ldap /etc/dovecot-ldap.conf
passdb = ldap /etc/dovecot-ldap.conf
dovecot-ldap.conf:
hosts = rdg-home.ad.rdg.ac.uk
dn = cn=bind-user,cn=users,dc=rdg-home,dc=ad,dc=rdg,dc=ac,dc=uk
dnpass = XXXXX
ldap_version = 2
base =
2005 Apr 11
1
LSUB matches prefix bug?
I think I've found a minor bug in the LSUB command:
. LSUB "" "*"
gives
...
* LIST (\Noselect) "/" "#maildir"
^^^^
* LSUB () "/" "#maildir/test4"
where I have a namespace with prefix "#maildir/".
Here's a patch to make it not list the namespace prefix in an LSUB
command (or should it list it as 'LSUB
2005 Sep 11
1
Do index files need removing when upgrading 1.0-stable to 1.0-alpha1 or later?
Hi Timo,
Just a quick question: do index files still need removing when upgrading
from 1.0-stable (as in the testXX series) or will Dovecot regenerate
them automatically?
I'm expecting to go with 1.0-stable on Tuesday for my 20,000 users (as
that's what I've been testing), but if we see lots of index issues, I
may want to upgrade to alpha1 (or later) fairly soon afterwards and it
2006 Feb 24
1
INBOX as Maildir and folders as mbox
Hi,
I was wondering whether anybody has managed to get Dovecot 1.0 to store
INBOX as Maildir and folders as mbox.
I've tried something like
default_mail_env =
mbox:/folders/user/mail:INBOX=maildir:/inboxes/maildir/user:INDEX=/indexes/user
but it doesn't seem to work (treats INBOX as mbox).
I'm hoping to move some INBOXes from mbox on local disk to Maildir on
nicely-mirrored NetApp
2006 Jun 30
1
1.0rc1 location variable bug
I think I've found a bug in Dovecot 1.0 rc1 where if you have namespaces
without the "location = " setting defined, it fails to use
default_mail_env as it should.
This seems to have been broken by :-
2006-06-16 18:13 Timo Sirainen <tss at iki.fi>
* src/master/: auth-process.c, login-process.c, mail-process.c,
main.c, master-settings.c: Settings parser nowadays returns
2006 Nov 28
1
Heimdal & gssapi.h
I've had some trouble compiling GSSAPI on SuSE Enterprise 9 using
Heimdal. It turns out that this installation has
/usr/include/heimdal/gssapi.h rather than gssapi/gssapi.h.
krb5-config correctly sets -I/usr/include/heimdal in the CFLAGS.
Looking back, there was a similar issue a few months ago:-
http://www.dovecot.org/list/dovecot/2006-July/014945.html
I'm a complete newbie to