Displaying 20 results from an estimated 1000 matches similar to: "20060114 snapshot compilation warnings"
2005 Mar 18
2
Pine and prefix - LIST command bug?
I've been having problems with Pine 4.62 talking to Dovecot 1.0 stable.
It's fine when the folder collection path is empty, but if I have
"~/mail/" or "mail/" it gives access errors (I'm using the "~/mail/",
"mail/" etc. hidden namespaces for backwards compatability).
It seems to me that Dovecot is not replying correctly to a "LIST"
2005 Apr 11
1
LSUB matches prefix bug?
I think I've found a minor bug in the LSUB command:
. LSUB "" "*"
gives
...
* LIST (\Noselect) "/" "#maildir"
^^^^
* LSUB () "/" "#maildir/test4"
where I have a namespace with prefix "#maildir/".
Here's a patch to make it not list the namespace prefix in an LSUB
command (or should it list it as 'LSUB
2005 Jul 13
0
Minor bugs still in test77
Thinking of patches I always apply, I've got a couple (attached) that
fix minor bugs and maybe should be applied - or implemented better and
then applied ;) - to the main distribution?
1) LIST bugs:
LIST "~/mail/" ""
and
LIST "" "~/mail/"
(where "~/mail/" is a namespace prefix) don't reply the same way as
UW-IMAP does and in at
2006 Jan 24
1
Fwd: Weird problem opening mbox in beta1/2
Hmm, this is peculiar!
This mailbox has been unchanged on my test server since September. I've
been using it to test each new version of Dovecot just after I've
compiled it.
When beta1 was released, I opened this mbox with no problems. However,
when I upgraded to beta2, I got "file size unexpectedly shrinked in mbox
file /export/mail/a/24/vis99003/INBOX (16895967 vs 16899267)".
2005 Mar 22
2
Address with whitespace shows as ""@MISSING_DOMAIN
It seems that Dovecot gets confused when presented with a header like:
From: someone at somewhere.org
i.e. with leading whitespace and no "friendly name"
This shows up as ""@MISSING_DOMAIN in clients, such as Pine, that
believe what Dovecot tells them rather than parsing the headers
themselves (e.g. Thunderbird).
Here's a sample IMAP session:
xyz FETCH 728 ENVELOPE
2005 Mar 15
2
Read-only mail folders
Is it possible to have folders on read-only partitions in Dovecot
1.0-stable?
We have a NetApp fileserver which would probably be accessed via NFS
(though iSCSI is possible) and which stores readonly "snapshots" of
every directory accessible as .snapshot (but usually hidden from the
operating system). It would be very nice to set up a "snapshot"
namespace something like
2005 Mar 17
1
Namespaces and subscriptions
I've got a problem with subscriptions in 1.0-stable when migrating from
UW-IMAP.
I've modified the SUBSCRIPTION_FILE_NAME entries as suggested in the
Wiki http://wiki.dovecot.org/Migration and included the "~/mail/" etc.
hidden namespaces.
The .mailboxlist files contain entries like "~/mail/somefolder" and the
clients have "~/mail/" set as a prefix.
In
2005 Sep 21
1
Another address-spec problem
I've had complaints from users about "MISSING_DOMAIN" in header fields
and I've tracked it down to having "." in an unquoted display name.
By my reading of RFC2822 (especially section 4.1)
A N Other <a.n.other at somewhere.org>
"A. N. Other" <a.n.other at somewhere.org>
are legal, but
A. N. Other <a.n.other at somewhere.org>
is
2005 May 05
1
1.0-stable loses flag changes sometimes?
I've been struggling with an odd bug in the latest 1.0-stable
(20050427) release. Sometimes Dovecot seems to forget that a message
has been read or deleted and marks it unread (or not deleted).
As far as I've been able to determine, it seems to happen when
1) There have been several recent deliveries
2) Possibly some of those deliveries are of multiple messages
3) Possibly they are read
2005 Jun 14
3
dovecot.index.cache 1/3rd of INBOX size
I've noticed that my dovecot.index.cache file has got very large (24MB,
which is more than 1/3 of my INBOX size). I've tried deleting (well,
renaming) the dovecot.index.* files, and re-opening my INBOX, and the
new dovecot.index.cache is only 90KB so far.
I'm using dovecot-1.0-stable and mbox format. My mail_cache_fields and
mail_never_cache_fields are set to the default.
Looking
2005 Apr 20
3
Why is "UIDVALIDITY changed" fatal?
I've got several users testing Dovecot IMAP at the moment, but some of
them are also accessing their mail via UW-IMAP at other times. (I've
warned them about accessing the same folder simultaneously via
UW-IMAP and Dovecot!) In addition, we have special folders "AutoSpam"
and "Trash" that pruned using Washington's "mailutil" automatically
every so
2009 Dec 18
3
imap-login crashes after upgrade to Dovecot 1.2.8 Linux 64-bit
Hi all,
We moved our Dovecot installation first of all to have all folders and
inboxes on NetApps via NFS (with indexes local) then from a physical
Solaris 8 4-way UltraSparc server running Dovecot 1.2.5 (32-bit) to a
virtualised Ubuntu 8.04 64-bit server with a single virtual processor
(in VMWare ESX 3.5) running Dovecot 1.2.8 (64-bit).
Since the change, many of our users have experienced
2008 Jul 18
2
quota vs. antispam issue
Can you help me maybe? I don't see the bug.
QUOTA=maildir QUOTA_RULE='*:storage=100M' MAIL_PLUGINS="antispam quota" MAIL_PLUGIN_DIR=/home/johannes/Projects/dovecot/antispam gdb --args /home/johannes/Projects/dovecot/dovecot-1.1/src/imap/imap
GNU gdb 6.8-debian
Copyright (C) 2008 Free Software Foundation, Inc.
License GPLv3+: GNU GPL version 3 or later
2005 Jul 20
3
Another minor IMAP LIST issue
I've just noticed that Dovecot 1.0-stable and 1.0-test78 don't include
mbox folders with names beginning with "." in the IMAP LIST output.
These are often used to store "hidden" folders for storing things like
IMAP client configuration (e.g. Pine 4.x, IMHO, Prayer). Usually the
user shouldn't be able to see these, but there are occassions when they
might. It seems
2008 Jul 23
2
Dovecot 1.1.1 + zlib plugin + mbox crash
I've tried this on both Solaris 8 and SuSE Enterprise 9 (64-bit).
I get a assert-crash when using a gzipped mbox folder
. OK Logged in.
. SELECT test.gz
* FLAGS (\Answered \Flagged \Deleted \Seen \Draft $Label4 $Label2
$Label1 $Label3 $Label5)
* OK [PERMANENTFLAGS ()] Read-only mailbox.
* 167 EXISTS
* 0 RECENT
* OK [UNSEEN 2] First unseen.
* OK [UIDVALIDITY 1096038620] UIDs valid
* OK
2009 Oct 03
1
Another 1.2.5 imap panic
We've had another random imap process crash. This is with the original
1.2.5 imap (I haven't applied the patch for two processes creating an
index simultaneously):
> Oct 03 13:24:56 imap-login: Info: Login: user=<xxxxxxxx>, method=PLAIN, rip=134.225.1.46, lip=134.225.16.6
> Oct 03 13:25:59 IMAP 6067 xxxxxxxx 134.225.1.46 : Info: delete: uid=483, msgid=<xxxxxxxx>
> Oct
2006 Sep 22
1
Dovecot 1.0.rc7 ioloop-poll.c assertion failed after SIGHUP
Anybody else seen this one? We're running Dovecot 1.0.rc7 on a different
port on our live server (we're generally live with 1.0.beta5) and after
a HUP to reload the user database (in a passwd-file) this morning we got:-
> dovecot: Sep 22 07:45:05 Info: IMAP 14482 someuser xxx.xxx.xxx.xxx : Disconnected in IDLE
> dovecot: Sep 22 07:45:05 Warning: imap-login: SSL_read() syscall
2005 Sep 27
2
How safe is mbox_very_dirty_syncs?
I've tried turning on mbox_very_dirty_syncs for myself (and a few other
brave souls running 1.0-alpha3 rather than 1.0-stable) again to see what
perfomance gain it gives (see thread
http://www.dovecot.org/list/dovecot/2005-July/007956.html).
Now we aren't running UW-IMAP at all, how safe is mbox_very_dirty_syncs
assuming the only other process writing to mailboxes is our MTA (exim)
which
2008 Jul 11
1
Dovecot-1.1.1 with quota and antispam plugin - segmentation fault
Hello!
I have port-built dovecot-1.1.1 on freebsd 6.3 i386 box.
There is signal 11 on imap child occurs every time when i'm trying to send
email.
In fact, email is sending to MTA correctly, but when message moving to Sent
folder segmentation error appears.
I built dovecot and antispam plugin with -g3 -O0 -pipe
With GDB I recieve next:
GNU gdb 6.1.1 [FreeBSD]
Copyright 2004 Free Software
2007 Jan 31
2
Quota crashing w/ gdb backtrace
Hi,
I'm still running into consistent crashing when moving files between
folders when dirsize quotas are enabled. This is running Dovecot1.0rc19.
Please let me know if I'm posting this to the wrong list.
Here is the gdb backtrace:
#0 0x377fc in mbox_file_seek (mbox=0xc8560, view=0xc94c0, seq=1,
deleted_r=0xffbef157) at mbox-file.c:167
167 if (data == NULL) {
(gdb) bt