similar to: Permission denied but works anyway

FBSD 4.8, Dovecot-0.99.10 1) I have mail accounts for people who use Macs and Windows, so their mail is stored on a Unix box where they don't have accounts. When their mail comes in, it is stored in /var/mail/<accountname>. When I was setting this up, I used my own Unix account for testing, and that works fine. But for the other mail accounts, which don't correspond to Unix

Well, I'm about ready to throw Asterisk across the room. Can someone tell me WHY, when you've sent a Dial command to Asterisk via AGI, if the callee hangs up the call, Asterisk sends a return code, but if the caller hangs up, it does not??? This means if an agi script services a call, and after the two parties have finished speaking, the person who initiated the call hangs up, the agi

I've moved from a postfix setup to a qmail/vpopmail setup I've setup the dovecot.conf file for vpopmail That works fine, users can log in, but the problem is when they go to see their folders. Nothing is there. INBOX, Drafts, nothing. This is using any imap client, imp, evolution, outlook, outlook express This is using 99.14 and the latest vpopmail/qmail I looked at the directory

Hi folks, I'm new to WINE and have actually read the docs, so go easy on me. My machine is setup to dual boot between Red Hat 7.2 and Windows2000. This is what I get when I try to run Eudora 5.1 from my Win2k partition. This is as far it'll go--no window ever displays. I get identical results with either WINE 20020122 or a CVS snapshot from yesterday evening. Let me know if

I have used Eudora since v 1.35 (circa '93). For quite some time, I have enjoyed keeping each of my mail accounts' folders in totally separate directory trees. In Eudora you do this by specifying the data locatoin as part of the startup: '<program location>/eudora.exe <data location>' So I am quite spoiled. But there is no Eudora support in Linux/CentOS. So

Hi, This might not be entirely samba server related, but the problem I am experiencing is affecting a planned implementation of a new Samba Server, and from the smbmount man page, it appears that this is the recommended list to reqest help - so hopefully someone might be able to assist :-). I am running a Debian Linux machine (kernel 2.6.0) with Samba 3.0.1 which will soon be replacing an

>Date: Tue, 11 Aug 1998 13:21:06 -0400 >From: CERT Advisory <cert-advisory@cert.org> >To: cert-advisory@coal.cert.org >Subject: CERT Advisory CA-98.10 - mime_buffer_overflows >Reply-To: cert-advisory-request@cert.org >Organization: CERT(sm) Coordination Center - +1 412-268-7090 > >-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- >

First off, thanks to the Wine team-- the 10/4 build is the closest to working well with Eudora I have had since the one I currently run, which was 1/12/01. Second, thanks to Lawson Whitney for sending me the socket patch so I could get the 10/4 build on the net! Now, Eudora Light 3.0.5 is running much better under the 10/4 build. A few little things are still wrong. Running just "wine

Hello All, I'm trying to migrate from UW Imap to Dovecot (latest 1.0 beta 2). The target is to go from the actual environment (Eudora + POP3) to a web based IMAP environment (IMAP + SquirrelMail). While migrating we will need to keep both environments for some time, with users having both the ability to use Eudora through POP3 while in the office and also the ability to check e-mail

I love the routes feature for RoR...until now. I''m trying to write tests to make sure my urls are correctly mapping to the routes I expect them to map to. This is driving me nuts because I simply can''t get any of my tests to pass. I have thus concluded that routes must work differently than I thought. I will try to explain my understanding of how routes work. Via this

There seems to be a protocol mismatch between eudora and dovecot when using pop. The login interchange with, for example, mozilla, is as follows: MO: [connects] DC: +OK dovecot ready. MO: CAPA DC: +OK DC: CAPA DC: TOP DC: USER DC: UIDL DC: RESP-CODES DC: STLS DC: SASL PLAIN DC: . MO: USER yyy DC: +OK MO: PASS xxxxxxxx DC: +OK Logged in. But with eudora, with apparently equivalent

Hi, I recently had problems setting up Eudora to store its data on a network share. The problem was that while it did work, it was incredibly slow, I would estimate about 10 times slower than it should be. I did some experimentation and found that it worked properly if the client was running Windows 98, but not if the client was running Windows 95. I could also get rid of the problem by turning

I'm having major problems with the 10/4 Wine release. Currently the only thing I really use Wine for is Eudora Light 3.0.5. The most stable release for me thus far has been wine-20010112, which is what I'm using right now. Most of the releases since then have had window problems with Eudora-- messages having too much blank space, strange things. So I tried 1004, and it has a new

Hi, this was originally reported on ports@. [1] Someone noticed that after after running sudo their session disappeared when running `w` afterwards. I've done a little experimenting and this is caused when pam_lastlog.so is included in sudo's pam file. This results in the user still being logged in though according to the system logs the user has logged out. Here's an example:

I love the routes feature for RoR...until now. I''m trying to write tests to make sure my urls are correctly mapping to the routes I expect them to map to. This is driving me nuts because I simply can''t get any of my tests to pass. I have thus concluded that routes must work differently than I thought. If someone could possibly point me in the right direction, I would really

Greg Rivers <gcr+dovecot at tharned.org> wrote: > On Saturday, May 09, 2015 22:25:48 Michael Grimm wrote: >>> or just try if it works if you change it to /bin/sh and use whatever >>> FreeBSD has that pointing to. >> That fails because /bin/sh equals /bin/csh at FBSD. > I don't know if it fails or not, but if it does this is not the reason. > /bin/sh

Hello, Most of the docs i've seen for implementing samba3 as a pdc are for Linux. And for a most part they work with FreeBSD. I've not got the box production yet, i have several questions and was wondering if anyone used samba3 on fbsd as a pdc? If so i'd appreciate hearing from you. I want to set up single sign-on authentication, and password changing with the fbsd system. So

I am really quite puzzled as to why I have to edit smb.conf every time I want to print to the FreeBSD machine from Win2K. (Running FBSD 4.7, samba 2.2.7 and cups 1.1.15.1_4. When I log onto FBSD with username, password, I see the folders for the printers, home, tmp, etc. but no printer. (Only 1 installed - Epson Stylus Color 900). I can access the shares on FBSD from Win2k, but there is no

Hi, the Wine program seems great. I run Eudora in WinXP, and this program will enable me to run Eudora in Fedora 3 and use the same mailboxes via Captive-NTFS - and so I will always have my email up-to-date. I have one big concern: viruses. Is it possible for me to get infected with a virus using Wine? If I got infected, how well could the virus infect my system? Meaning, I plan to

Hello list , just one thought, If you had a 'package verify" function , wich automatically installs itself and updates itself on any major update (a builtin eatire,posible for a future build), then that alone would eliminate multiple packages, of wich sometimes they have bad components left behind. I have seen a similar idea in the ports/vulnerability-test-port , I think this is a root