similar to: dovecot 1.0-stable (050721) rpm for FC3

Displaying 20 results from an estimated 50000 matches similar to: "dovecot 1.0-stable (050721) rpm for FC3"

2005 Aug 13
1
Upgraded from 0.99 to 1.0 stable on FC3
Hi I upgraded to 1.0 stable and saw this in the maillog UIDs broken with partial sync in mbox file /var/spool/mail/thejohns_brian i am using mbox files with default_mail_env = mbox:/var/spool/mail/%u Is this a problem that i should worry about? Mark
2005 Sep 25
1
stable 1.0 on FC3
Hi should this worry me dovecot: POP3(chelan): file mail-index-view-sync.c: line 60 (view_sync_get_expunges): assertion failed: (ret == 0) using mbox format under /var/spool/mail/ Mark -- Obantec Support www.obantec.net 0845 458 3121 WebHosting and Domains Nominet UK Member & IPStag Holder CentralNic Accredited Reseller
2005 Jan 26
0
Unhandled exception c0000005 after fresh rpm install on FC3 x86_86
I got stuck with Wine on 64-bit Fedora Core 3. I can not remember when it happened (I was using wine few times a month), but somehow wine stopped working. I have removed all rpms and installed wine20050111-1fc3 rpm but when I start wine for the first time as a "normal" user, it fails with the following: wine: creating configuration directory '/home/robert/.wine'... wine:
2007 Mar 19
0
Blank Dailog Boxes FC3 - Wine RPM install
I was experimenting with Wine a while back, and have periodically built Wine from source for experimenting. I have been careful to clean up after myself (make uninstall) afterwards. Last night, I did an install of Wine version 0.9.20 on a system running Fedora Core 3 by running "# yum install wine". The install ran smoothly, however, all wine dialog boxes (including winecfg) are
2006 Jan 25
1
Problem with folders, dovecot-0.99.13-3.FC3 and Eudora 7.0.1
Greetings, the Eudora client is attempting to create a subfolder of an existing folder, using the "Make it a folder option" which creates a directory under /home/<user>/mail/<a few paths>. Eudora is seemingly stuck in attempting to create the directory, but there is nothing under /var/log which seems useful in diagnosing the problem. Thank you for your consideration,
2005 Dec 14
1
No "Ok Dovecot Ready " on fc3 with ssl on ports 993 and 995
Skipped content of type multipart/alternative-------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: dovecot.conf Type: application/octet-stream Size: 20440 bytes Desc: not available Url : http://dovecot.org/pipermail/dovecot/attachments/20051214/c3493d0b/dovecot-0001.obj
2005 Dec 12
0
configuring squirrelmail with tls for both imap & smtp on FC3 with dovecot & postfix
hey friends, I am trying to secure my mail server.I have enabled TLS support in postfix(version postfix-2.1.5), now I am trying to configure squirrelmail(version 1.4.4-1 rpm) for tls/ssl support.In config.php i have choosen use_imap_tls=true and use_smpt_tls=true. Moreover If I send any mail from squirrelmail there are no entries for ssl or tls in maillogs whereas If I send the mail through
2005 Apr 26
3
dovecot 0.99.xx to 1.0-stable how-to?
I realize that there have been some big changes in features and configuration file settings between 0.99.xx and 1.0-stable, so when I went to perform an upgrade on our testing server, I carefully combed through the configuration files and matched up everything I could. I fired up dovecot-1.0-stable and was pleased to see that it was happily running. I attempted to connect to it, and
2005 Apr 26
1
Dovecot Stable (or: When is 1.0 coming to a server near you?)
I'm mainly just curious, but what version of dovecot is considered to be stable enough to be running in a production environment? We're running the 0.99.13 version shipped with FC3 and, while experiencing great performance gains over UW-IMAP, we have hit a couple of snags here and there (random and infrequent characters at the beginning of a mailbox, periodic duplication of a message
2005 Oct 06
2
Dovecot on FC3 with Active Directory authentication
I am building an IMAP server that uses Dovecot/Sendmail on FC3 to replace our POP server that uses Dovecot (via POP)/Sendmail on FC2. My new server is authenticating users via winbind/smb against my WIndows 2003 Active Directory. The authentication is working great. The problem come up when a user gets an email and has not ever logged into the IMAP server via SSH, local, or GDM,
2005 Jul 19
3
dovecot pop3s delivers new messages as old (unread) messages ...
I just set up dovecot on fedora core 3 with only pop3s protocol enabled. On my client machine, I use fetchmail to get the mail and then go through procmail and eventually ready by mutt. Everything seems to work fine, except that all new emails are marked old unread emails (i.e., marked with 'O' flag instead of 'N'). This is annoying because some open source lists are so large
2006 Dec 04
1
Enabling different quota limits for different users for /etc/passwd as userdatabase on FC3
hey friends, I am running my company's mail server on FC3 which comprises of Postfix + Dovecot + MailScanner + Clamav + Squirrelmail + MailWatch + Spamassassin. I am using Dovecot 0.99.13-3 version on FC3 and I want to implement Quota limits for the users. I am using userdatabase as /etc/passwd file (auth_userdb = passwd ) and password database as pam(auth_passdb = pam) for dovecot. I read
2005 May 06
0
Re: imap on Centos 4 -- UW IMAP 2004b for FC3/RHEL4
From: Matt Hyclak <hyclak at math.ohiou.edu> > Actually, the more direct replacement would be Dovecot. > Cyrus can be complicated to set up and get running. I actually modified the old UW IMAP 2002 SPEC file from RHL9/FC1, and modified a few config files, to support UW IMAP 2004b. I made one with both RFC3501 (no text passwords over SSL) and non-RFC3501 (legacy, text passwords
2005 May 29
0
Horrendously slow transfer speeds in FC3 is drivingmecrazy!!! Please help... - SOLVED!
Thanks for the tip but recompiling the latest version was the second thing I did after trying and failing to tweak the smb.conf on my original hardware conf. I found that compiling it for my specific architecture (i686) increased my performance by 100% (from a punny 0.8 MB/s to a better but still punny 1.6 MB/s). -----Original Message----- From: Diego Julian Remolina
2005 Jan 31
2
dovecot-stable branch
To confuse Dovecot versioning even more, I've added "dovecot-stable" module into CVS. This is a version of Dovecot before the recent keyword changes but with several bugfixes backported to it. It's thought to be mostly stable. I intend to keep it updated with important bugfixes and with other simple bugfixes. Although I'm not sure if I'll make a large code base upgrade
2005 Mar 14
2
dovecot-stable mbox weirdness
I just tested dovecot-stable from 2005-03-08 and 03-12 and saw the following behavior. All of my mbox folders show is the first message's header. None of the files were truncated (whew, saves a restore). I had 0.99.12.1 installed before this, and just switched back to 0.99.14. Both 0.99.x versions work fine. I removed all of the index files to see if there was a hiccup there, with
2005 Jun 30
1
Samba on FC3
Hi Folks: I am continuing to work with samba on FC3 for use as a file server etc. I have set up my server according to the instructions on http://us3.samba.org/samba/docs/man/Samba-HOWTO-Collection/FastStart.html#id2535778 Here is my smb.conf file [root@srvfs-01 conf]# cat smb.conf [global] workgroup = MCASCHOOL netbios name = SRVFS-01 server string = MCA File Server
2005 Jun 08
1
assertion failed -0.99 -> 1.0-stable
Hello Timo, I've upgraded from dovecot-0.99 to dovecot-1.0-stable (the 2005-05-09 version) on FreeBSD 5.4 and encountered the following problems (problem #4 (assertion failed) made me downgrade back to dovecot-0.99...) : 1. mbox sync: UID inserted in the middle of mailbox /var/mail/gopauld (5230 > 4407) --> OK, that's documented on the Wiki, not a real problem 2. imap(cxxx):
2004 Dec 16
3
asterisk on FC3
Hello, Since FC3 has been a very recent release I was just wondering if there are issues related to asterisk installation on FC3. Thanks Varun
2008 Aug 05
2
remote install/upgrade of FC3 name server to CentOS 4 or 5
Hello, Does anyone know of a good URL that covers the remote install/upgrade of a FC3 system to CentOS 4 or 5? We have one physically stranded FC3 system which is a name server and we need to upgrade to remove vulnerabilities. Kind regards/ldv Larry Vaden Internet Texoma, Inc.