similar to: PERMANENTFLAGS bug?

Displaying 20 results from an estimated 1000 matches similar to: "PERMANENTFLAGS bug?"

2013 Aug 14
Dovecot mailbox in read-only mode, Permanentflags empty
Hi, I have installed Postfix + Dovecot 2.2.5 on a Fresh Arch Linux server (using Arch Linux repository packages). When accessing mailbox through Dovecot IMAP, all user mailboxes are in READ-ONLY mode. Here is a snippet from IMAP telnet conversation (after successful login). a LIST "" "*" * LIST (\HasNoChildren) "." INBOX a OK List completed. a EXAMINE INBOX *
2011 May 08
exceeded mail_max_userip_connections
Dumb Q I just got this in my Snapper client log I can't acces server log at this point dovecot 1.x I can access another account OK what it means, what I need do? (is this as I have K-9 client access same mail?) ---------- START MANUAL: 8/5/11 10:55 am RECEIVE: ACCOUNT: voytek SSL: Connection secure. IMAP Server: Maximum number of connections from user+IP exceeded
2005 Jun 27
imap corrupted indexes
I've searched the archives and find a lot of references to corrupted indexes but can't seem to find any solutions. It seems like folks either have the problem or they don't. We recently migrated from a RedHat Linux server to an OpenBSD 3.7 server (both using dovecot). Imap was working flawlessly on the RedHat box but now gives numerous index errors. I then upgraded to
2006 Aug 17
dovecot mbox to dovecot maildir migration
Hi, I'm migrating accounts from one server with dovecot mbox and pam nss-ldap authentication to a new server with dovecot maildir and mysql auth (no posix accounts). My problem is the pop3 uidl format on the two servers are different, even though I'm using pop3_uidl_format = %08Xu%08Xv in both configs, I'm always re-downloading left messages on my test runs. Is there a way I could
2007 Aug 08
UIDL match from 0.99.13 to 1.0-1.2
I am moving from and old FC2 system to a new RHEL5 system and am having trouble getting the UIDLs to move over right, mainly the UID. I copy over the mailbox, and see the x-uid in the message is what it was on the old server, but when I telnet in to check pop, it rewrites x-uid in the message to something new, causing old messages to get downloaded again, which is not what we want I have tried
2008 May 08
MBOX to Maildir preserving the UIDL (outlook-tested, no redownloading)
TESTED AND RUNNING, MIGRATING from MBOX to MAILDIR, PRESERVE UID and OUTLOOK sees the email as downloaded. I hope this helps a lot of people out there. Feel free to post this somewhere else too. By: Horn Wijaya (hwijaya at 8th May 2008 I have been searching for weeks for a foolproof method to migrate all my users mbox to maildir/dovecot without having the pain of
2006 Jul 02
Dovecot deliver logging problem and procmail
Hello! Currently I'm trying to integrate dovecot's deliver program into procmail. So basically I'd write a patch for procmail to deliver not directly into the mbox file but delivering with the dovecot deliver program. Do you think this is a good concept? For testing I use the commands discussed below. Currently I'm having a problem that deliver doesn't recognize the
2005 Apr 08
1.0-test67 Hopefully better release than last one. Fixes several problems test66 had and also some older problems reported in this list. It also contains a pretty large mbox code cleanup, fixing several problems (especially related to X-IMAP/X-IMAPbase headers) and making it a bit faster. Maybe I'll backport it to 1.0-stable too when it looks like it's
2015 Sep 29
quota count
Hi Dovecot: 2.2.19.rc2 OS: CentOS Linux release 7.1.1503 (Core) FS: XFS Problem: Dovecot it does not include line breaks in the letter. Bug or feautre? Message size in fs: 1125 bytes Message: From cras at Tue Jul 23 19:39:23 2002 Received: with ECARTIS (v1.0.0; list dovecot); Tue, 23 Jul 2002 19:39:23 +0300 (EEST) Return-Path: <cras at> Delivered-To: dovecot
2010 May 01
My dovecot does not store Thunderbird flags
Hi all, my Dovecot 1.1.20 does not store flags (I mean, Thunderbird Labels like ToDo, Important and so on..) When logging in via telnet, I get: . examine INBOX * FLAGS (\Answered \Flagged \Deleted \Seen \Draft NonJunk $MDNSent Junk $Forwarded NotJunk receipt-handled $Label7 $label1 $label2 $label3 $label4 $label5 expired_2w expired_2m delete rimandata forwarded) * OK [PERMANENTFLAGS ()]
2015 Jun 09
Dovecot mbox & other programs
On 6/9/2015 8:36 AM, Charles Marcus <CMarcus at> wrote: > On 6/8/2015 5:11 PM, Pali Roh?r <pali.rohar at> wrote: >> Still I want read/write access to storage and want to use mbox as >> storage (also for easier backup and copy)... >> >> And my question was how to properly read and write from/to mbox files
2015 Jun 06
Dovecot mbox & other programs
Hello, I want to use dovecot as imap server with mbox storage format (described at [1]) but I also want to access (and modify!) those mbox files which are stored on server (and used by dovecot). What is correct way to read those mboxes? From wiki page [1] I read that I should ignore first message in mbox (which contains X-IMAPbase header) and mbox file is in mboxcl2 format. And what is
2007 Mar 14
One user having reproducible IMAP issues
Dovecot version upgraded to 1.0r26 (did not fix problem). The server is a CentOS 4 x86 box. Using ext3 filesystem. Previous attempts to fix the issue have included simply moving aside the user's INBOX to recreating a new account from scratch. Sometimes the email behaves for a while, but within a day is not working again. In (the user's usual mail client) the INBOX folder
2004 Nov 17
automatic flag updates
Is there a way to get dovecot to send automatic flag updates? I notice that when I have two clients connected and one of them reads a new message, the server sends a status update which contains the number of unseen messages, but doesn't specifically say which ones have changed. I think the solution to this problem, while not wasting bandwidth, is to issue a unilateral FETCH FLAGS response
2016 Feb 24
search problem dovecot 2.2.21 + fts - Solr
Hello, Realized update dovecot on my server. Now the search is returning differently from the previous version bringing reference information of other messages . For example when doing a search for anderson.joao this new version of the dovecot dovecot 2.2.21 + fts - Solr response will be all email that has the word anderson and joao, instead of returning only items with the word anderson.joao.
2016 Feb 19
imapc tries to fetch uid 0
Hi, This is a capture from an imapc client session (which is triggered by a message, received via LMTP): * OK [CAPABILITY IMAP4rev1 NAMESPACE] Ready 2 LOGIN "uid" "pass" 2 OK LOGIN succeeded 1 LIST "" "" * LIST (\Noselect) "/" "" 1 OK LIST completed 3 APPEND "INBOX" {568} + Ready for 568 octets of data [...] 3 OK APPEND
2006 Feb 12
Problems with POP3 UIDL when migrating from MBOX to Maildir
Hello, I am in the process of migrating a hosting setup from UW-IMAP to Dovecot. The protocols available to mail clients are IMAP and POP3 both before and after migration. I also wanted to change the mail storage format from MBOX to Maildir. However, at this point I hit a major snag with Dovecot and POP3 UIDL (unique identification listing for POP3 mailboxes). Several of the customers connecting
2018 Feb 18
2 - Virtual Mailbox Issue bug maybe ?
So virtual/combined was meant to combine INBOX/Sent/Drafts and virtual/all display them in a threaded manner .. at least that was the intention ... rgds Matt > Aki Tuomi <mailto:aki.tuomi at> > 18 February 2018 at 11:10 pm > > Uhm. > > combined folder seems to use INBOX for saving mails and contains mails > from Sent and Drafts. > > Not
2005 Jul 18
UID errors?
Hi all, Keep getting these messages: Jul 18 09:48:47 orxon dovecot: POP3(d2525): mbox sync: UID inserted in the middle of mailbox /var/mail/d2525 (109 > 3) Jul 18 09:48:47 orxon dovecot: POP3(d2525): X-IMAPbase uid-last unexpectedly points outside mbox file /var/mail/d2525 For a bunch of users. Any ideas?
2012 Oct 29
does dovecot interpret any mail headers specially with maildir?
Hi. For mbox, lists a numer of mail headers: - X-IMAPbase - X-IMAP - X-UID - Status - X-Status - X-Keywords - Content-Length that are treated specially by dovecot. It also suggests, that these should be stripped by the LDA (I guess in order that someone sending you such mail cannot set the status or keywords, or