similar to: comparision with other imap servers and folder sharing

Hi all, In June 2007 Jerry Nelson started a thread on this mailing list about a problem he was seeing. The thread was http://syslinux.zytor.com/archives/2007-June/008673.html After several hours of searching through the list, I am still convinced that his problem was never solved and is very valid. I recently moved from the old syslinux config options model (all labels in 1 default config file)

Hi Do you know some articles, papers, something than tell about comparision between R and others softwares statisticals. Thank You Ricardo -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/Articles-about-comparision-between-R-and-others-softwares-tp19338210p19338210.html Sent from the R help mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

On 12 October 2012 11:10, Miroslav Lachman <000.fbsd at quip.cz> wrote: > I don't like comparing Release Candidates without any details about config, > but the fact that DF 3.2 is much better than DF 3.0 is interesting. And they > are very close to performance of Scientific Linux 6.2. Hey cool! And FreeBSD-9.1 is on there and doing worse than Linux and Dragonfly BSD. I wonder

On Nov 17, 2010, at 11:14 PM, Duncan Sands wrote: > Hi Evan, > >> Thanks David. Unfortunately many of us cannot use GPL v3 gcc so it's hard for us >> to investigate this. One question, can you tell if gcc is inlining significantly >> more than llvm? We have reports that this is one of the issue plaguing eon >> performance. > > are you allowed to look at

Dear R-list, Could anybody tell me (or give me a tip) of how to implement the Duncan distribution in R? I've been trying to make a new and more flexible function for multiple comparison of means: Tukey, SNK and Duncan, from 'aov' objects, like TukeyHSD function. For while, it is running nice (Tukey and SNK), for simple design (completely randomized, randomized block and Latin

Dear All, I am using R and I am putting my problem in form of an example: X<-c(128,34,153,987,345,45,3454,23,123) I want to remove the entries which are lesser than 100(? How to compare every element with 100 and how to create subsets ) and I need two vectors y and z s.t y<-c(entries < 100) z<- c(remaining entries) Moreover, Please tell me which command to use if I want to use

Hi Evan, > Thanks David. Unfortunately many of us cannot use GPL v3 gcc so it's hard for us > to investigate this. One question, can you tell if gcc is inlining significantly > more than llvm? We have reports that this is one of the issue plaguing eon > performance. are you allowed to look at assembler output by GPL v3 gcc? If so, maybe someone else can do the compiling for you,

Hi, it looks like Ferret still compares numeric fields by lexical ordering, not numerical ordering. I am using Ferret 0.11.4(I tried in both linux and windows, the results are the same). index = Ferret::Index::Index.new() docs = [ {:num => 1, :data => "yes"}, {:num => 1, :data => "no"}, {:num => 10, :data => "yes"}, {:num => 10, :data

Timo or anyone, This may be a bug or maybe a design decision. Either way I am curious to hear comments. Why do the dovecot-0.99.14 server's .imap.index files contain a cached copy of each message's date and time as supplied by the filesystem, as opposed to the date and time found in each message header? When testing various imap clients (eg. tbird-1.0.2, evolution-2.0, outlook2003,

Hi all, After pinging the AMP userlist at SourceForge, I got a great step by step explanation as to how to set up AMP for Apache2 (some maybe obvious stuff that wasn't in the Newbie Guide). Thanks to Jason Becker of Coalescent Systems. If anyone needs me to post Jason's instructions here, I can, but they are in a thread called "AMP noob issues with Apache2/Suse9.2" at

Thanks David. Unfortunately many of us cannot use GPL v3 gcc so it's hard for us to investigate this. One question, can you tell if gcc is inlining significantly more than llvm? We have reports that this is one of the issue plaguing eon performance. There are also some relatively well known spec optimizations that we haven't implemented. e.g.

In my efforts to convince people to hear how good Vorbis is when compared to MP3, I'm gonna be encoding tracks from my CD collection to both formats, then writing them to audio CD, so people don't have to install extra software to hear the difference. Has anyone got some suggested specs for the options for MP3 encoding when using CDex or Chun-Yu's MP3 writer for winamp (preferably in

Hi, I've been setting up * recently and slowly getting to grips with it, however I'm getting rather confused with all the different configs for IAX calls, FWD calls iaxtel etc etc. What I think I need it a basic understanding or even a comparison of these different voip systems (if thats what they are?) I'd like to be able to make calls to other voip users, both in the UK and abroad

Hi, I have looked at the LLVM code generation quality using small test cases and in general it is better than I thought and in some cases better than gcc. However, there are still some gap in SPEC performance. I have not looked at the root cause of those gaps. Anyone who cares about LLVM performance need to take this seriously. For fair comparison, I used -fno-strict-aliasing in gcc to turn off

Hello, Has anybody succeded in running 3270 emulator (IBM PCOM) on wine? I tried it by copying PCOM folder from windows to fake windows directory under wine and tried below command wine "C:\Personal Communications\PCSWs.exe" Though I am not getting any error message, the program is not getting started. Can anybody please help PS : I am using Wine 20040813 which is available with

Hello! I've tried to set up dovecot in conjuction with vpopmail, and running it under djb's tcpserver instead of (x)inetd. Btw - there was no reference to setting dovecot up using (x)inetd either in the manuals/faqs i read, though I didn't search all that hard. Anyway, back to my Q: vpopmail uses vchkpw as an authentication mechanism, and with tcpserver I can do relaycontrol (based

Hi, It looks like I have found a bug in LLD. Suppose DSO defines a global variable 'data' and initializes it by the address of function 'set_data' defined in the same DSO. If an executable file (linked by LLD) gets address of the '&set_data' function and compares it with a value stored in the 'data' variable it gets different result. If the executable is linked

> Sorry - I once was sold on the idea of djb's tools and Qmail, and I've > regretted installing it ever since. Save yourself some serious agony - run > (don't walk!) away from djb-ANYTHING! I don't know what problems you had with it, but I'm hapilly using it on about 20 servers (both djbdns and qmail) and never had a problem with it. I'll remember your advice

If you are using Bind as your caching name server, please take note. http://www.net-security.org/secworld.php?id=5366 I use DJB's dnscache so I could care less.

Yes, I had just reduced it too. I am pretty sure this was implemented at some point. Taking a look. Cheers, Rafael On 8 February 2016 at 17:52, Sean Silva <chisophugis at gmail.com> wrote: > Sounds like it is related to this: > > http://www.airs.com/blog/archives/42 > """ > > The fact that C permits taking the address of a function introduces an >