similar to: Key mishmash

Please, do not delay this "Important" multiple security update. See https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2009-0225.html for more info. This update is "5.3" kernel but has been released as security update too. RHN pushed this kernel one day ahead of rest of 5.3 packages (on my servers). RH maintains API and ABI (!) compatibility so there is no problem to use this kernel

Thank you to all the people that responded. I found a php.spec file for EL3 and modified the php.spec file that came with the php source rpm from the CentOS mirros. Built and installed the php-snmp rpm and it is working great!!! For anyone that would like to have a copy for themselves can find it at http://traffic.wonderwave.net I will leave it up for a week or two so act fast. I also posted the

Hi, I saw that the page https://wiki.centos.org/HowTos/Laptops/NetworkManager which is outdated. I created account MilanKerslager and now I'm asking for permission to edit this page in Network section. Thank you. Milan Kerslager -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL:

Hello several months ago I install WhiteBox Linux on several severs, I was happy, not woriing about upgrading every 1,5 year as when I use RH 4.0, 6.0, 7.3, 9.0 .... And then WhiteBox went black, WBEL updates release slowed down and maintainer wont help form anybody. Just telling "If you want quick updates, build it yourself.". I prefer wasting time for customizations and/or

How do I get this set up? spamassassin -D --lint shows me an error... debug: bayes: no dbs present, cannot tie DB R/O: /root/.spamassassin/bayes_toks and with no db present, it doesn't learn. Is there something simple that I'm missing? Craig

Hi folks, I have just installed a PCI SATA controller based on the SIL3112A chipset into my Centos-3 (latest kernel patches applied) system and moved an existing (not the boot disk) SATA drive from the onboard controller to the SIL-based one so I can setup software RAID with two 300GB drives. Kudzu/Linux found the controller and drives straight away and they've appeared as 'hda' and

Hello, I have a quick question. I am currious why reiserfs isn't compiled into the kernel? Although RHEL doesn't include the tools to manage reiserfs it includes the kernel drivers. Thanks, Bill

Aaron, > It is a kernel problem. The stack size changed in > the 2.6 kernel. You > need a version of the kernel with the old 8k stack > size. You can get > such a kernel from: > www.linuxant.com/driverloader/wlan/full/downloads-fc2-kernel-i686.php > > As you can see these are fedora kernels but might > work on centos. Actually, while troubleshooting this display

I just downloaded the bind-chroot rpm and looked into it with Archive manager (so I am lazy), and no files, just the chroot tree. I am assuming there is some script that Archive manager does not show, or I am just missing it, because the ROOTDIR= did get added to /etc/sysconfig/named (and the one in the bind rpm is without this line). Just interesting that if you chroot, you are expected to

Hi list, here is what happened: today I noticed some resolution's problems on my network. I did a "service named status" and here was the output: # /etc/init.d/named status rndc: connection to remote host closed This may indicate that the remote server is using an older version of the command protocol, this host is not authorized to connect, or the key is invalid. In the

Hi all, I'm trying to install phpMyAdmin in my CentOS baox but I don't found the package in the default repos. ?Is this package provided in official CentOS repos? -- Jordi Espasa Clofent PGP id 0xC5ABA76A #http://pgp.mit.edu/ FSF Associate Member id 4281 #http://www.fsf.org/ -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: not available Type:

hi, i try use iptables connlimit, # iptables -I INPUT -p tcp --dport 80 -m connlimit --connlimit-above 16 --connlimit-mask 24 -j DROP iptables: Unknown error 4294967295 where is problem ? thanks # rpm -qa | grep iptables iptables-1.3.5-4.el5 # uname -a Linux test 2.6.18-92.1.1.el5 #1 SMP Sat Jun 21 19:04:27 EDT 2008 i686 i686 i386 GNU/Linux

Installed using pkd_add or ports BIND-9.6.0-P1 working fine. 1.But seems can't run under chroot well: ---------------------------------------------------------- Jan 27 13:54:08 ns named[36447]: starting BIND 9.6.0-P1 -c named.conf -t /var/named -u bind Jan 27 13:54:08 ns named[36447]: built with '--localstatedir=/var' '--disable-linux-caps'

Example from real life >From Roubdcube, I serach "milan" in full message (body & headers) Logs : Apr 3 10:24:01 gjserver dovecot[29778]: imap(jom at grosjo.net)<30311><4pACp52FfCF/AAAB>: Query : ( bcc:milan OR body:milan OR cc:milan OR from:milan OR message-id:milan OR subject:milan OR to:milan OR uid:milan ) Apr 3 10:24:01 gjserver dovecot[29778]: imap(jom at

For this first point, the problem is that dovecot core sends TWICE the request and "Inbox" appears in the list of arguments ! (inbox shall serve to select teh right mailbox, never sent to the backend) And even if this would be solved, the dovecot core loops *after* the backend hs returneds the results # doveadm search -u jom at grosjo.net mailbox inbox text milan doveadm(jom at

No, the parsing is made by dovecot core, that is nothing the backend can do about it. The backend shall *never* reveive this. (would it be buggy or no) PLease, have a look deeper And the loop is a very big problem as it times out all the time (and once again, this is not in any of the backend functions) On 2019-04-21 10:42, Timo Sirainen via dovecot wrote: > Inbox appears in the list of

Timo, A little of logic here : 1 - the mailbox is passed by dovecot to the backend as a mailbox * pointer , NOT as a search parameter. -> It works properly when entering a search from roundcube or evolution for instance. -> therefore this is a clear bug of the command line 2 - the loop : Actually, the timeout occurs because the dovecot core is DISCARDING the results of the backend

Inbox appears in the list of arguments, because fts_backend_xapian_lookup() is parsing the search args wrong. Not sure about the other issue. > On 21 Apr 2019, at 19.31, Joan Moreau <jom at grosjo.net> wrote: > > For this first point, the problem is that dovecot core sends TWICE the request and "Inbox" appears in the list of arguments ! (inbox shall serve to select teh

On 3 Apr 2019, at 20.30, Joan Moreau via dovecot <dovecot at dovecot.org> wrote: > doveadm search -u jom at grosjo.net mailbox inbox text milan > output > > doveadm(jom at grosjo.net): Info: Query : ( bcc:inbox OR body:inbox OR cc:inbox OR from:inbox OR message-id:inbox OR subject:inbox OR to:inbox OR uid:inbox ) AND ( bcc:milan OR body:milan OR cc:milan OR from:milan OR

It's because you're misunderstanding how the lookup() function works. It gets ALL the search parameters, including the "mailbox inbox". This is intentional, and not a bug. Two reasons being: 1) The FTS plugin in theory could support indexing/searching any kinds of searches, not just regular word searches. So I didn't want to limit it unnecessarily. 2) Especially with