similar to: Bug?: Authentication still doesn't work with imap-login

Greetings: I've been using Dovecot 1.0-test62. It has been working well. I tried to upgrade to 1.0-test64 but users could not authenticate. Both versions I compiled with: ./configure --with-ssl=openssl; make; make install They compiled and installed fine. The /usr/local/etc/dovecot.conf needed to be modified due to the new syntax. 1.0-test64 with the new dovecot.conf didn't work.

Hi, Got the following today with test62 and mbox: IMAP(juergen): Fixed index file /home/juergen/Mail/.imap/INBOX/dovecot.index: recent_messages_count 19 -> 0 imap-login: Login: juergen [192.168.0.1] file mail-index-sync-ext.c: line 118 (mail_index_sync_deinit_handlers): assertion failed: (size <= synch_size) child 31196 (imap) killed with signal 6 after that I had to delete

Hello, I've been trying to figure out what's wrong with authentication against an ldap pass/user db with test67 as test62 was working fine. [ The problem is the same as previously described in this list : - FreeBSD-5.3 - dovecot-1.0-test67 - openldap-2.1.27 --> "ldap(dovetest,127.0.0.1): No password in reply" --> "NO Temporary authentication failure." or --

When connecting with mutt via IMAPS, I get "connection to server closed" and this appears in logs: dovecot: Feb 04 12:48:30 Error: IMAP(rathann): file mail-index-sync-ext.c: line 118: assertion failed: (size <= synch_size) The problem goes away after deleting the index from ~/Mail/.imap/INBOX. We're running 1.0-test62 on Solaris 9. -- Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski

Hi, I had successfully set up dovecot-1.0-test62 + ldap pass/user db, but now I'm encoutering a SIGSEV problem with a similar set up of a brand new dovecot-1.0-test65 installation. The auth process is killed by a SIGSEV as reported in the error log file : dovecot: Mar 30 17:06:59 Error: child 28291 (auth) killed with signal 11 To be precise, the problem occurs in the

Trying to get dovecot up and running. I managed to get everything compiled and linked correctly, but there seems to be some problem with either the auth process or communication between the main process and the auth process. When I try to login, I get: * OK dovecot ready. 1 login n9yty testing * OK Waiting for authentication process to respond.. And I keep getting the same message over and

I'm using the latest version of dovecot on my FreeBSD 4.x box with OpenPKG to keep other services up to date. Now...I'm able to get pbsmtp to allow relaying through postfix on this server using UW IMAP, but I would like to get dovecot working with relaying...but pbsmtp is not adding the ip when I uncomment the dovecot section after I authenticate. The log is below: [root at

Take a look at the sources, hmac.h declares struct hmac_context: struct hmac_context { char ctx[HMAC_MAX_CONTEXT_SIZE]; char ctxo[HMAC_MAX_CONTEXT_SIZE]; const struct hash_method *hash; }; If compiled for a 32 bit virtual address space, this has an alignment requirement of 4 due to the hash pointer. In line 171 of auth-token.c, we have following

I have recently begun playing with Dovecot (1.0.beta8) and have run into an interesting scenario. The way my email system is set up is that users of different domains have completely different base dn's. For instance, if a user is part of test.com the bind dn would be uid=user,ou=People,dc=test,dc=com. The bind dn for user at domain.com would be uid=user,ou=People,dc=domain,dc=com. I

http://dovecot.org/test/ Nothing big, just random fixes. - Crashfixes in keyword code - -std=gnu99 wasn't working well in all systems, configure now checks for it - FreeBSD sendfile() calling was broken sometimes. No need to remove #define HAVE_FREEBSD_SENDFILE anymore. - FETCH BODY[] wasn't setting \Seen flag. - LDAP fixes (by Kazuo Moriwaka) - Don't crash if client

i noticed this while browsing through my maillog.. Feb 21 11:27:43 selenium dovecot: IMAP(ben): Corrupted index cache file /u/home/ben/Maildir/.INBOX.ML-SunHELP.rescue/dovecot.index.cache: field index too large (3337 >= 22) i have no problems reading that box after this, and see no other messages about corrupt index files from today, or the past 14 days. --ben

Hi Michael, Once it was a pane in the neck for me to set this up as I had almost the same problem. First you have to find out in your Linux distribution where do you setup a permanent route entry. I mainly use Mandrake, but it had changed the way it handles this, but look at the file "/etc/sysconfig/static-routes", it had a syntax similar to the command that you stated below without the

I hope any of you shorewall freaks would be able to help me with my problem. First a little network description: I have two zones: WAN net = eth0 (One IP address from my Internet Service Provider) LAN loc = eth1 (192.168.23.0/24) Default gateway (the Internet) for the local clients are 192.168.23.2 (the IP address of eth1) I have used all the guides at the homepage of Shorewall,

Test version 61 ./configure is failing on my OpenBSD 3.6-stable system. The following corrects the problem. Would it be possible to test for gnu99 option before using it in subsequent tests? --- configure.in.orig Fri Jan 14 14:04:10 2005 +++ configure.in Fri Jan 14 16:44:22 2005 @@ -236,7 +236,7 @@ # say specifically that we want C99 features. # we can make use of

Can anyone help with scripting the commands below? 1. Add/create a new column to df and name it as ShortPause . 2. Convert ShortPause as a factor variable. 3. ShortPause will have two levels (short and long). Assign short if pause is smaller than 0.1, and assign long otherwise. 4. How many ?syntax==intransitive? observations were realized with a tap (tapped==Tapped)? (Use xtabs() and ftable() to

I purchased an Intel D945GNT motherboard and it comes in the BIOS with an option to create a RAID 0 or RAID 1 volumes using my existing two SATA disks. However when installing Centos 4.3 x86_64 I see the the installer recognices the two drives and does not "see" the RAID 0. Is that ok? Should I disable the RAID in the BIOS and then go for a LVM+RAID 0 setup in the installer ? Since it

Hello, This may be a really stupid question, but can a gel type marine battery be used in a UPS? Thanks

Hello, I was trying to to write a simple ruby program for exceptions. My code is: class ABC begin alpha = ABC.new alpha.foo= [1,2,3] puts foo.inspect.to_s NonExisting raise "all other exceptions" rescue Exception => NoMethodError puts ''Hello'' puts $ERROR_INFO.inspect rescue Exception => NameError puts ''goodbye'' puts $ERROR_INFO.inspect else

I'm not able to use samba and vmnetnat. Please help me because this is making me crazy. I use XP on an ADSL connection. PPPoE IP is assigned dinamically. Eth0 IP can be assigned dinamically or statical *tried both* RedHat 8.0 is the guest, XP service pack 1 is the host. I also uses sygate firewall on XP *but i set allow all for testing* Linux routes via NAT and it works fine (even DNS

This is release 0.9.47 of Wine, a free implementation of Windows on Unix. What's new in this release: - New scheme for OpenGL support in child windows. - Lots of fixes for regression test failures. - A Tahoma replacement font. - Lots of bug fixes. Because of lags created by using mirrors, this message may reach you before the release is available at the public sites. The sources will