similar to: possible bug in 1.0-test62

Displaying 20 results from an estimated 200 matches similar to: "possible bug in 1.0-test62"

2005 Feb 06
1
crash with test62
Hi, Got the following today with test62 and mbox: IMAP(juergen): Fixed index file /home/juergen/Mail/.imap/INBOX/dovecot.index: recent_messages_count 19 -> 0 imap-login: Login: juergen [192.168.0.1] file mail-index-sync-ext.c: line 118 (mail_index_sync_deinit_handlers): assertion failed: (size <= synch_size) child 31196 (imap) killed with signal 6 after that I had to delete
2005 Mar 14
5
aha! (was apple mail vs. v0.99)
it seems that when you say "check for new mail" in apple mail, it sends a NOOP to the imap server to get the response. in uw, the conversation is something like: 25 NOOP 25 OK NOOP completed 26 NOOP * 2796 EXISTS * 7 RECENT 26 OK NOOP completed however, with dovecot, if it has already notified the client that new mail has arrived, it will look something like: * 24 EXISTS * 2 RECENT
2018 Dec 31
5
[Bug 109187] New: [NVC1][optimus] nouveau black display, only mouse cursor visible
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=109187 Bug ID: 109187 Summary: [NVC1][optimus] nouveau black display, only mouse cursor visible Product: xorg Version: unspecified Hardware: x86-64 (AMD64) OS: Linux (All) Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: medium
2005 Mar 15
1
Authentication to Active Directory
Has anybody managed to have Dovecot authenticate to Microsoft Active Directory? I've tried to get it to work using LDAP and the following settings dovecot.conf: userdb = ldap /etc/dovecot-ldap.conf passdb = ldap /etc/dovecot-ldap.conf dovecot-ldap.conf: hosts = rdg-home.ad.rdg.ac.uk dn = cn=bind-user,cn=users,dc=rdg-home,dc=ad,dc=rdg,dc=ac,dc=uk dnpass = XXXXX ldap_version = 2 base =
2005 Jul 20
2
Dovecot vs.Clients - strange behaviour, diagnostics sought
I've been experimenting with dovecot-1.0-stable on Solaris. Storage format is mbox. Dovecot, in test, runs in parallel with an UW IMAP, with dovecot running SSL-only on port 994. It seems to work to some extent: * dovecot runs * authentication works * SSL works * all manual IMAP functionality checks seem to work fine However, I'm running into issues with IMAP clients. * Null
2018 Feb 20
25
[Bug 105174] New: [regression] BUG unable to handle kernel NULL pointer dereference in kernel 4.15.3
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=105174 Bug ID: 105174 Summary: [regression] BUG unable to handle kernel NULL pointer dereference in kernel 4.15.3 Product: xorg Version: unspecified Hardware: x86-64 (AMD64) OS: All Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: medium
2020 Jun 16
0
Fix build error with GCC 10 due to multiple definition of `toplevel'
Hi When building with GCC 10, gcc is stricter in handling handling of symbol clashes. Fedora, has fixed this with a patch from Dominik Mierzejewski: https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/tftp/c/5e2aa55b6802a52ef480d688b3ae4751220f20e0.patch Attaching the corresponding patch for git am. Regards, Salvatore >From 9e7641bf58df9dda3bc51f381f371fa7cbce47af Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Salvatore
2020 Sep 29
0
[PATCH RESEND] tftp-hpa: Fix build error with GCC 10 due to multiple definition of `toplevel'
Hi When building with GCC 10, gcc is stricter in handling handling of symbol clashes. Fedora, has fixed this with a patch from Dominik Mierzejewski: https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/tftp/c/5e2aa55b6802a52ef480d688b3ae4751220f20e0.patch Attaching the corresponding patch for git am. I'm sending the patch which was submitted a while ago to the list. Is there something you wanted to be
2005 Mar 12
1
dovecot test62 vs test64
Greetings: I've been using Dovecot 1.0-test62. It has been working well. I tried to upgrade to 1.0-test64 but users could not authenticate. Both versions I compiled with: ./configure --with-ssl=openssl; make; make install They compiled and installed fine. The /usr/local/etc/dovecot.conf needed to be modified due to the new syntax. 1.0-test64 with the new dovecot.conf didn't work.
2018 Mar 01
39
[Bug 105319] New: DRM: EVO timeout with kernel 4.15.x
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=105319 Bug ID: 105319 Summary: DRM: EVO timeout with kernel 4.15.x Product: xorg Version: unspecified Hardware: x86-64 (AMD64) OS: Linux (All) Status: NEW Severity: major Priority: medium Component: Driver/nouveau Assignee: nouveau
2005 Jan 31
0
1.0-test62
http://dovecot.org/test/ Nothing big, just random fixes. - Crashfixes in keyword code - -std=gnu99 wasn't working well in all systems, configure now checks for it - FreeBSD sendfile() calling was broken sometimes. No need to remove #define HAVE_FREEBSD_SENDFILE anymore. - FETCH BODY[] wasn't setting \Seen flag. - LDAP fixes (by Kazuo Moriwaka) - Don't crash if client
2005 Feb 21
0
index corruption with test62 on openbsd 3.6
i noticed this while browsing through my maillog.. Feb 21 11:27:43 selenium dovecot: IMAP(ben): Corrupted index cache file /u/home/ben/Maildir/.INBOX.ML-SunHELP.rescue/dovecot.index.cache: field index too large (3337 >= 22) i have no problems reading that box after this, and see no other messages about corrupt index files from today, or the past 14 days. --ben
2019 May 23
4
[Bug 110748] New: [NVC1] [optimus] fifo: read fault at 0000000000 engine 00 [PGRAPH] client 00 reason 02 [PAGE_NOT_PRESENT]
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=110748 Bug ID: 110748 Summary: [NVC1] [optimus] fifo: read fault at 0000000000 engine 00 [PGRAPH] client 00 [] reason 02 [PAGE_NOT_PRESENT] Product: xorg Version: unspecified Hardware: Other OS: All Status: NEW Severity: normal
2005 Apr 12
1
test67 ldap_connection
Hello, I've been trying to figure out what's wrong with authentication against an ldap pass/user db with test67 as test62 was working fine. [ The problem is the same as previously described in this list : - FreeBSD-5.3 - dovecot-1.0-test67 - openldap-2.1.27 --> "ldap(dovetest,127.0.0.1): No password in reply" --> "NO Temporary authentication failure." or --
2005 Mar 30
2
test65 killed by SIGSEV
Hi, I had successfully set up dovecot-1.0-test62 + ldap pass/user db, but now I'm encoutering a SIGSEV problem with a similar set up of a brand new dovecot-1.0-test65 installation. The auth process is killed by a SIGSEV as reported in the error log file : dovecot: Mar 30 17:06:59 Error: child 28291 (auth) killed with signal 11 To be precise, the problem occurs in the
2005 Feb 05
1
New user Q: dovecot-0.99-13 / UnixWare 7.1.0
Trying to get dovecot up and running. I managed to get everything compiled and linked correctly, but there seems to be some problem with either the auth process or communication between the main process and the auth process. When I try to login, I get: * OK dovecot ready. 1 login n9yty testing * OK Waiting for authentication process to respond.. And I keep getting the same message over and
2007 Sep 10
0
Dovecot connection error because of the desynchronization between a index file and it's log file
Today, i lost connection with the mail server. I think that there are some problem with the index file and it's log file. Following is the log for losing connection. Sep 10 11:18:01 biosoft dovecot: POP3(hjnam): Transaction log file /home/hjnam/mail/.imap/INBOX/dovecot.index.log: marked corrupted Sep 10 11:18:01 biosoft dovecot: POP3(hjnam): Fixed index file
2005 Mar 04
2
pop before smtp
I'm using the latest version of dovecot on my FreeBSD 4.x box with OpenPKG to keep other services up to date. Now...I'm able to get pbsmtp to allow relaying through postfix on this server using UW IMAP, but I would like to get dovecot working with relaying...but pbsmtp is not adding the ip when I uncomment the dovecot section after I authenticate. The log is below: [root at
2005 Feb 21
1
Bug?: Authentication still doesn't work with imap-login
I tried digging it all through. I can't find a solution. The problem pops up in auth-master-connection.c in function master_input_request. It does a auth_client_connection_lookup with the "client_pid" (which behaves as a counter, where i would expect a constant process-id...) Something is very wrong with this PID. Maybe someone can explain the Master <--> Auth IPC to me so
2005 Jan 15
1
test61 ./configure fails on OpenBSD 3.6
Test version 61 ./configure is failing on my OpenBSD 3.6-stable system. The following corrects the problem. Would it be possible to test for gnu99 option before using it in subsequent tests? --- configure.in.orig Fri Jan 14 14:04:10 2005 +++ configure.in Fri Jan 14 16:44:22 2005 @@ -236,7 +236,7 @@ # say specifically that we want C99 features. # we can make use of