similar to: Just delete that index

Displaying 20 results from an estimated 20000 matches similar to: "Just delete that index"

2009 May 04
2
mail_index_sync_map error on 1.1.14
Seen this error a few times from dovecot-1.1.14, Mac OS X, 64-bit Intel. NFS may have been used. Panic: IMAP(user): file mail-index-sync-update.c: line 843 (mail_index_sync_map): assertion failed: (map->hdr.indexid == index- >indexid || map->hdr.indexid == 0) Two different backtraces to this error are: 0 libSystem.B.dylib 0x00007fff87b775ea __kill + 10 1
2005 Jun 08
2
Debugging test72
When attempting to save a message from the INBOX to a folder in a collection (like, .projects.dovecot), I get behavior like this (in GDB). Any clue what might be going wrong? Here's where a SIGABRT happens: 280 return array->buffer->used / array->element_size; This is the stack trace: (gdb) where #0 mail_index_map_get_ext_idx (map=0x1200c0db0, ext_id=0,
2004 Jul 27
2
Errors with a blackberry
Hi - We tried to access a dovecot-0.99.10.7 IMAPS server with a Blackberry 7230. The Blackberry was on loan so we don't have much access to it for testing. We got the following in our logs: Jul 27 12:30:27 xserv imap-login: Login: testuser [xxx.xxx.xxx.xxx] Jul 27 12:30:27 xserv imap(testuser): IndexID mismatch for binary tree file /home/testuser/mail//.imap/INBOX/.imap.index.tree Jul 27
2004 Dec 17
3
Assistant access
Does anyone have a clue how I might set Dovecot up to allow another account to have read/write access to my INBOX and one other folder? I want to set things up so my assistant can pre-scan my post-Spamassassed email to remove more spam from it. Thanks! Doug
2018 Aug 08
1
dovecot Panic: file mail-index-sync-update.c: line 1013
An email came to several users but one user didn't receive it and we got 'Mail delivery failed' message. As I see from the log below, there were broken index file. Then dovecot repaired that index and we got the error: Panic: file mail-index-sync-update.c: line 1013 (mail_index_sync_map): assertion failed: (map->hdr.indexid == index->indexid || map->hdr.indexid == 0) It was
2017 Jul 21
4
Corrupt index files
I am running Dovecot IMAP on Linux, on a LizardFS storage cluster with Maildir storage. This has worked well for most of the accounts for several months. However in the last couple of weeks we are seeing increasing errors regarding corrupted index files. Some of the accounts affected are unable to retrieve messages due to timeouts. It appeared the problems were due to the accounts being accessed
2005 Jan 14
3
Squirrelmail - messages not marked as read
As of test-60 and test-61, running Squirrelmail 1.5.1[cvs] on FreeBSD 5.3-STABLE, messages are not marked as read after they are read. If I switch back to test-59, it works normally. When switching back to test-59, with log_path = /var/log/dovelog dovelog shows: dovecot: Jan 14 11:43:38 Error: IMAP(kimc): Corrupted index cache file /home/kimc/Maildir/dovecot.index.cache: indexid changed
2004 Oct 12
2
assertion failed and debugging dovecot
I'm getting this error on a particular message in my Maildir: Oct 11 21:59:48 aurora dovecot: IMAP(doug): file ostream-file.c: line 646 (_send_istream): assertion failed: (instream->v_offset <= in_size) To me, more import than the question "why is this happening" is "how can I debug this?" Attaching gdb to the running imap process doesn't give me access
2003 Jun 16
2
more newline related errors
Should I be concerned about these errors? imap(msun): Jun 13 13:21:38 Error: Error indexing mbox file /home/msun/mail/Deleted Messages: LF not found where expected imap(msun): Jun 13 13:39:08 Error: Corrupted binary tree for index /home/msun/mail/.imap/INBOX/.imap.index: lookup returned index outside range (1 >= 0) imap(msun): Jun 13 13:44:07 Error: IndexID mismatch for binary tree file
2006 May 22
1
beta8: cores on corrupted index file
Timo, I saw a couple of these cores over the weekend. The syslog says: May 21 19:04:48 emerald dovecot: [ID 107833 mail.error] IMAP(user): Corrupted index cache file /home/students/s/user/.imap/sent-mail-apr-2004/dovecot.index.cache: indexid changed With a resulting core file from imap at this time. I also discovered a remaining lock file on the person's imap file: -rw------- 1 user
2001 Oct 23
1
status of US mirror
When I try to go to http://cran.us.r-project.org I get sent to a location called "domains 4 sale" or something of that ilk, indicating that some "URL scavenger" has flagged it as expired. Has something happened, or is it just wishful thinking on some scavenger's part that the URL is no longer pointing to the US CRAN mirror? Try this link:
2004 Dec 28
1
Debugging msync() failed errors
>From today's maillog: maillog:Dec 28 09:29:40 aurora dovecot: IMAP(doug): msync() failed with index file /home/doug/Maildir/.projects.job591/dovecot.index: Invalid argument maillog:Dec 28 09:30:21 aurora dovecot: IMAP(doug): msync() failed with index file /home/doug/Maildir/dovecot.index: Invalid argument maillog:Dec 28 09:30:22 aurora dovecot: IMAP(doug): msync() failed with index file
2012 Mar 27
1
2.1.2 Corrupted squat uidlist
Hi Timo and All, after upgrading to 2.1.2 i'm getting a lot of these messages: Error: Corrupted squat uidlist file XXXXXX wrong indexid I did not have them before. Ideas? Luca
2016 Nov 03
1
Forcibly terminated after 10 milliseconds
After an OS upgrade (to FreeBSD 11 with pkg Dovecot 2.2.26) I'm getting this sort of thing in my logs: Nov 3 12:15:16 toma dovecot: lda(doug): Error: program `/usr/local/lib/dovecot/sieve-pipe/growlmail' was forcibly terminated with signal 15 Debugging gives a little more info: Nov 3 12:05:51 toma dovecot: lda(doug): Debug: waiting for program
2011 Nov 04
1
Corrupted transaction log file
Hi, I'm experiencing a problem I need some pointers to debug. I'm running Dovecot 2.0.15 and have a client which keeps causing log-entries like: Nov 4 15:10:42 mail dovecot: imap (test at aaaone.net): Error: Corrupted transaction log file /mail/3340444/.TestMails/dovecot.index.log seq 2: indexid changed 1320419300 -> 1320419441 (sync_offset=0) Nov 4 15:10:42 mail dovecot:
2009 Sep 30
3
Some issues in Dovecot 1.2.5 after upgrade from 1.0.15
We upgraded from Dovecot 1.0.15 to 1.2.5 last night, on Solaris 10 using mboxes, mostly without issues. However I had to trash the index/cache files (too many folders were showing corruption issues which is especially bad for Prayer Webmail ".prayer" folders that store preferences; Prayer sees a disconnection as the folder being missing!). I've had one imap process panic in mailbox
2005 Feb 25
4
corruption and errors in dovecot-stable
Hi, We switched from dovecot 0.99.something to 1.0-stable (on FreeBSD 4.10) a few days ago and have been seeing many errors and one corrupted mailbox so far. Almost everyone uses mbox format, and most users primarily use SquirrelMail; I use Apple Mail and Thunderbird, as well as accessing the mailboxes locally with Mutt, and have not noted any visible problems. There have been several of
2005 Apr 10
0
imap segfault in mail-index-sync.c
Our support team seems to have caused another crash. They treat this mailbox like a shared one, so there may be a few people accessing it at once. They are mostly using dovecot, but some could be using uw-imap. These are the only two ways that this box is accessed. I know that this doesn't really work with mbox, but it doesn't appear to corrupt the mailbox. It seems to be a good stress
2017 Jul 24
0
Corrupt index files
On 21.07.2017 20:47, Bruce Guenter wrote: > I am running Dovecot IMAP on Linux, on a LizardFS storage cluster with > Maildir storage. This has worked well for most of the accounts for > several months. > > However in the last couple of weeks we are seeing increasing errors > regarding corrupted index files. Some of the accounts affected are > unable to retrieve messages due to
2017 Jul 21
0
Corrupt index files
Am 21.07.2017 um 19:47 schrieb Bruce Guenter: > > I am running Dovecot IMAP on Linux, on a LizardFS storage cluster with > Maildir storage. This has worked well for most of the accounts for > several months. > > However in the last couple of weeks we are seeing increasing errors > regarding corrupted index files. you should avoid this one solution is to use loadbalancers