similar to: pop3 with lmos results in multiple downloads

I have three Windows XP (All SP2) machines that won't cache credentials with a Samba DC. A Debian Sarge system with Samba 3.0.10 is the domain controller. It has three users and three machine accounts. The three users all are simple Unix users, with no mapping to Windows users. We use DHCP (entirely different server) and DNS, but local IPs do not resolve. The configuration files for Samba

Hi, I'm running samba 3.0.22 with 2000 and xp clients. Before upgrading to 3.0.22, i had vfs recycle module running like a charm. But since i upgraded, i have several errors "delayed write failure" on every systems 2000 and XP(every 10 seconds), and netscape 7 can't start anymore! In fact, it seems to have a problem with its lock file.So i tried veto oplocks = *.lock but still

Am 03.11.2019 um 09:42 schrieb Rowland penny via samba <samba at lists.samba.org>: > > ?On 02/11/2019 23:18, Hilberg via samba wrote: >> Hi >> >> The server suddenly changed the uid + gid. this happened to times, yesterday and the week after. The default group at example >> The samba is a AD member where we have many users (>20 000) and we use autorid in

Items in dmesg when FAT share's are accessed from web browser: CIFS VFS: bogus file nlink value 0 When accessed from FC/L (OFM (orthodox filemanager)): CIFS VFS: illegal date, month 0 day: 0 When the share is initially mounted: CIFS: Attempting to mount //hostname/E Use of the less secure dialect vers=1.0 is not recommended unless required for access to very old servers CIFS VFS: Send error

Dear All, I am running a two location SOHO network with a Microsoft AD on a Windows 2008 R2 server. In detail, the infrastructure is as follows: Primary location: - 1 DC on Windows 2008 R2 hardware server - 1 DC on Windows 2008 R2 virtual server - 2 DC on Windows 2016 virtual servers (forest functional level 2008) - 1 DC on Samba 4.6.2 on Debian Jessie Secondary location: - 1 DC on Samba 4.6.3

Hi, I have just started to turn my Linux boxes over to use winbind for authentication and ldap based idmap backend servers (open-ldap). As far as I understand the documentation (for version 3.0.23c) it is only possible to specify one ldap server, mine config line looks like: idmap backend = ldap:ldap://idmap.xelerated.com I did try to map the idmap.xelerated.com entry in DNS to two

openSUSE v13.1 linux 3.11.10-11-desktop x86_64 samba 4.1.6 I recently upgraded an openSUSE server from v12.3 to v13.1. In the older version there was no problem about mounting a remote volume offered by an ancient OS/2 system. Now there is. Trying to mount it by command line: root:/home/sma-user3x> mount /t2 Retrying with upper case share name mount error(6): No such device or address

Perhaps someone can help this poor soul out? I don't *think* it was just spam to webmaster, but it's hard to tell through the [lack of coherent] grammar. Monty ---------- Forwarded message ---------- From: Hosting and More <info@hostingandmore.de> Date: Nov 6, 2006 3:20 PM Subject: (kein Betreff) To: webmaster@xiph.org RadioStreams rent hello We at the moment, unfortunately,

Jeremy Allison via samba composed on 2020-04-23 09:24 (UTC-0700): > On Thu, Apr 23, 2020 at 02:59:18AM -0400, Felix Miata via samba wrote: >> Items in dmesg when FAT share's are accessed from web browser: >> CIFS VFS: bogus file nlink value 0 > nlink should never be zero. If an SMB server > returns that, then the CIFSFS client will have > to fake it to 1 at least.

Daniel, On Sat, May 30, 2015 at 09:26:32AM -0300, Daniel van Ham Colchete wrote: > B, > I really like the idea of N-way replication. Pairs are ugly, they cost double! Even if you have 20 servers, when one goes down all that IO traffic goes to just one. > So, what I did here was a (kind of) DHT-based n-way replication, where the node for the second copy is independent of where

Hallo, I've just installed Kernel 2.6.25.2 - works fine. But now when I use "smbmount" for mounting shares from my Win9x clients the system (kernel) tells me smbfs is deprecated and will be removed from the 2.6.27 kernel. Please migrate to cifs. But at least Win9x seems not to like cifs. Mounting via smbfs works since years, mounting (with the same options) via cifs

Hello list, I'll first describe my set up: server1 : live server server2 : backup server3 : backup of the backup so the data set is copied in this order server1->server2->server3 they are not done at the same time so there would be no collisions. I use this shell script to back up: for i in a b c d e f g h i j k l m n o p q r s t u v w x y z `seq 0 9`; do

Does anyone know if someone is planning one of these? I've seen comments about oggs on a pda, but I'm more interested in something like an iPod. I wrote apple and haven't received a response for weeks. I'm wondering if anyone else has had better results. --Robert -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: signature.asc Type:

Dear All, I am running a two location SOHO network with a Microsoft AD on a Windows 2008 R2 server. The only secondary DC is a Microsoft HyperV VM running on the same Windows machine. My aim is to become more independent from Microsoft products. Nevertheless, I need to upgrade my server to Windows 2016 sometime soon - which does not mean that the DC level needs to be upgraded to Server 2016

Joost Witteveen (joost@iliana.nl) wrote: > > So, each UDP package with 20 bytes speex-data, we send: > > 20 bytes speex > 12 bytes ogg headers (and others?) > 28 bytes UDP/IP headers (2 IP numerbers, 2 portnumbers, checksum, etc, etc) > > and, if it goes over the phone, each package has a few ppp headers. > > Am I overlooking something, or does this fixed frame

Hi, I'm trying to setup automatic sync of files over SSH from node2 to node1. node2 is the "server" and node1 is the "client". I have setup rsync like this on the nodes which runs AIX (4.3.3 and 5.1): 1. Installed rsync from Linux Toolbox (rsync-2.5.4-1.aix4.3.ppc.rpm) on both nodes. 2. Added following to both nodes /etc/services file: rsync 873/tcp 3. Added

Hallo Herr Jahn, falls Sie eben Anrufe von uns bekommen haben und Sie nichts geh?rt haben - das liegt an Problemen, die wir momentan mit unserer Telefonanlage haben. Deswegen kurz per Mail: Ich habe die Pakete auf Datei-m2 installiert. Da wir mit dem Setup von den Samba-Servern ja zuletzt einige ?berraschungen erlebt hatten, w?rde ich vorschlagen, dass Sie den Server erstmal mit einem anderen

I have installed Ubuntu 12.04.1 LTS on a new laptop. Everything seems great, except... I have this old Windows 98 machine that I treat as a server (no remarks, please). I've had it for a long time. When I access the shares from the Ubuntu 12.0.4 machine, a lot of files and directories that I know are there do not show up. I've tried just browsing to the shares in nautilus, places

On 03/11/2019 15:06, Liste via samba wrote: > Am 03.11.2019 um 09:42 schrieb Rowland penny via samba <samba at lists.samba.org>: >> ?On 02/11/2019 23:18, Hilberg via samba wrote: >>> Hi >>> >>> The server suddenly changed the uid + gid. this happened to times, yesterday and the week after. The default group at example >>> The samba is a AD member

On Thu, Apr 23, 2020 at 02:59:18AM -0400, Felix Miata via samba wrote: > Items in dmesg when FAT share's are accessed from web browser: > CIFS VFS: bogus file nlink value 0 nlink should never be zero. If an SMB server returns that, then the CIFSFS client will have to fake it to 1 at least. > When accessed from FC/L (OFM (orthodox filemanager)): > CIFS VFS: illegal date, month 0