similar to: eudora issue

Hi, I'm trying to set up dovecot to do pop3 from Eudora, but it keeps breaking on authentication attempts using plain auth. When I snoop the connection with tcpflow, here's what I see: 128.174.246.068.00110-062.107.004.050.49653: +OK dovecot ready. 128.174.246.068.00110-062.107.004.050.49653: +OK dovecot ready. 128.174.246.068.00110-062.107.004.050.49653:

Hello, I have dovecot q1.0-0_22.rc7 up and running on a server: I can read email from squirrelmail just fine. When I try to download email with fetchmail, however, I get the result below. Why is that happening? In dovecot.conf I have: protocols = imap imaps pop3, so why should pop3 or imap fail? Where should I look? (I'll fix the certificates problem after I've managed to get in

Hello, is it possible to disable the announcment of STLS in the CAPA-command for the pop3-daemon? I want to support pop3s, but only at port 995, not through the STLS on port 110. The reason for this is that some clients have problems with this and strange errors appear (e.g. older imap-libs) although they don't seem to have a problem with pop3s through port 995. Regards Marten

Hi, a few days ago I started to get some complaints about authentication delays from Thunderbird POP3 users. After some debugging it turned out that the problem was introduced somewhere between 1.2rc3 and 1.2rc7 (1.2.0 is still affected). A session with Thunderbird 2.0.0.22 against 1.2rc3 looks like this: <<< +OK Dovecot ready. >>> CAPA <<< +OK <<< CAPA

Hi folks, I'm new to WINE and have actually read the docs, so go easy on me. My machine is setup to dual boot between Red Hat 7.2 and Windows2000. This is what I get when I try to run Eudora 5.1 from my Win2k partition. This is as far it'll go--no window ever displays. I get identical results with either WINE 20020122 or a CVS snapshot from yesterday evening. Let me know if

First off, thanks to the Wine team-- the 10/4 build is the closest to working well with Eudora I have had since the one I currently run, which was 1/12/01. Second, thanks to Lawson Whitney for sending me the socket patch so I could get the 10/4 build on the net! Now, Eudora Light 3.0.5 is running much better under the 10/4 build. A few little things are still wrong. Running just "wine

Hey Guys, I figured someone might have use of this at some point. I've created an iRule for our F5 Load Balancer which performs the following tasks: - Appends STLS to the POP3 Capability list (it does this blindly, so expects the backend POP3 server to not return this) - Watches for the STLS command and initiates SSL negotiation with the client (leaves the connection to the

I'm trying to get Dovecot (dovecot-0.99.10-6) to work with Eudora (6.0 mac/win) and am having a real problem when I try to enable SSL, either TLS or alternate-port SSL. Although my other mail clients, mail.app, imp, etc. work just fine, either version of Eudora craps out when trying to connect via TLS or SSL -- on the mac I get the error Could not get mailbox list. 20 [CLOSED]

Has anyone been able to get Eudora Pro 5.x working with wine? I've got Red Hat 7.1, and I'm trying to get my Eudora Pro 5.0 running on my linux box, but so far, no luck. Thanks, David

I just upgraded from v0.9.9 to v0.9.32 (on Ubuntu 6.06) and Eudora Pro v4.2 stopped working. It no longer opens a mailbox when the icon is clicked. The log shows "fixme:rpc:alloc_serverprotoseq protseq "mswmsg" not supported" each time I click to open a mailbox. This was working on v0.9.9 so I am looking for ideas as to how to work around this problem. There is a bug

Hi everyone, i just installed dovecot in Fedora Core release 1 (Yarrow). When accessing from a eudora 6.1 client, first it gave ssl authentication problems. I fixed disabling them in eudora, but now it authenticates ok and then it says that there is no inbox for that user. Any idea? Enrique Pedraza Valiente Formador en Lenguajes Avanzados y Nuevas Tecnolog?as cell: +34 678 51 75 19

Hi, I recently had problems setting up Eudora to store its data on a network share. The problem was that while it did work, it was incredibly slow, I would estimate about 10 times slower than it should be. I did some experimentation and found that it worked properly if the client was running Windows 98, but not if the client was running Windows 95. I could also get rid of the problem by turning

We are (only just) upgrading from Samba 1.9.18p10 to the latest 2.2.7a. We run Eudora 5.1 on our PC clients, which pick up their mail boxes from home directories on Solaris machines using samba shares. When we install the new Samba, all our Samba clients slow down incredibly. I suspect here is a change in the Samba config file requirements between the versions? Has anyone else already solved

Hi, I spent days trying to figure this out, and read over the instructions on the website over and over. I'm not super advanced with Linux, so I might need baby steps. I've tried running Eudora 5.1 (I think that's the version), and I keep on getting missing DLL warnings. I've put those DLLs in all the directories and made changes to the config file, but not use, I'm

Greetings, the Eudora client is attempting to create a subfolder of an existing folder, using the "Make it a folder option" which creates a directory under /home/<user>/mail/<a few paths>. Eudora is seemingly stuck in attempting to create the directory, but there is nothing under /var/log which seems useful in diagnosing the problem. Thank you for your consideration,

I have a problem with __extremely__ slow performance using the Eudora mailtool. Both the executables and the mailbox are on (different) Samba servers. I have played with all the combinations of placements for executables and mailbox, and what it amounts to is that the slowness happens with the mailbox on a SunOS 4.1.4 Samba server. It doesn't happen on a Solaris based Samba server. As an

Hi, I'm looking for a solution to access pop mails (sendmail in linux) securely. Most of the access would be from window clients (outlook express etc). Is there a way to encrypt the password (like ssh2) when authenticating with sendmail? Any info is greatly appereceiated. Thx. Regards, Wong.

I didn't get much joy in the list archives... Has anyone seen an instance of Mac users (OS9) using Eudora not being able to pop their mail? They can imap ok, just not pop (non-ssl btw). Nothing special in the logs... I'm not a Mac guy per se, maybe I'm missing something obvious? -- Chris Alexander UNIX Network Administrator, Information Networks and Systems Division

Greetings all, I'm a new user of Dovecot and want to say thanks for the great software. I am having a problem at the moment. I run a heterogeneous network with windows and Mac clients logging into a Fedora Linux 2 box running sendmail and previously UW-IMAP, but now Dovecot. I am using strictly pop3, plain authentication with mbox format. Every computer in the network is working fine with

Hi, all! I configured Dovecot to use many protocols. To do this, I wrote: mechanisms = plain digest-md5 cram-md5 apop ntlm Very strange, if I ask the capability, I get: CAPA TOP UIDL RESP-CODES PIPELINING STLS USER SASL PLAIN DIGEST-MD5 CRAM-MD5 NTLM . I can't understand why APOP is not written (but I can use it!) and why I can see SASL, that I didn't configure... How can I change