similar to: Deleted emails in Outlook Express

We are using Dovecot 0.99.10.5 on a Redhat 9.0 Box. We are using the Squirrelmail Webmail client, and have occasionally had a problem with users move messages from their Inbox to the "Trash" folder. The Selected messages move to the Trash folder, but the rest of the messages in the INBOX disappear. Fred -- Fred Mulharin Systems Technology Supervisor Times Herald-Record fmulharin at

I am using the latest Stable version of Dovecot on a Redhat 9.0 box with the Squirrelmail Webmail Client, and my Indexes seem to be getting corrupted. Here is an example of what is showing in the Error Logs Error: Corrupted index data file /home/user/mail//.imap/releases/.imap.index.data: Missing location field for record 271 When they Try to access the corrupted folders thee get an IMAP

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Hi list, last Thursday I upgraded a samba installation from 2.2.12 to 3.0.14a. Everything went fine with the debian packages. But... All roaming profiles are registry hacked to place the OE mailstore onto the home drive and this worked fine for the last two years. Now after the upgrade all of my users complain about corrupt dbx files. Can anyone tell

Dovecot 2.0.9 I am able to connect successfully with Thunderbird, Win 8, Apple Mail, iPhone, iPad. Outlook Express on Win XP receives just fine, but will not send. I get a "Client host rejected: Access denied? message. I believe this is simply Postfix telling me the connection isn?t properly authenticated, as setting up the exact same credentials on another client (non OE) works. It is

Hi, I'm planning to switch from courier-imap to dovecot. Everythings seems fine. I adjust the namespaces to avoid client side changes. This works with Thunderbird, but Outlook Express seems to have problmes with the path "INBOX.", that I've configured in the client settings. I can remove that path, but the folders will be sorted under the inbox. Is there something that I've

Hi, This may be a problem with my config file but I am finding that customers (and more importantly my boss) that are using outlook express when using test66/67 (upgraded from test60 + from address patch) are having message reappear after being fully deleted (not just marked) but are unreadable, sometimes blank headers appear too but again no message. Since it is affecting my boss he has told me

Correct me if I?m wrong, but I thought Dovecot handled client authentication, and once authenticated handed off to postfix? > On Jun 1, 2015, at 10:05 PM, Noel <noeldude at gmail.com> wrote: > > On 6/1/2015 6:27 PM, SH Development wrote: >> Dovecot 2.0.9 >> >> I am able to connect successfully with Thunderbird, Win 8, Apple Mail, iPhone, iPad. >>

Am 21.11.2014 um 22:29 schrieb Reindl Harald: > > Am 21.11.2014 um 22:24 schrieb Robert Schetterer: >> Am 21.11.2014 um 20:59 schrieb Robert Moskowitz: >>> I have one user that uses Outlook Express. Not only do I not use it, I >>> don't have any systems here that can easily use it. I bit of a >>> challenge. >>> >>> I am strictly

My outlook express users connecting with imap are having issues with client timeout. The wiki says to add oe6-fetch-no-newmail, but when I add that workaround I get this error in the logs: Jun 2 10:00:13 mail dovecot: IMAP(username): Unknown client workaround: oe6-fetch-no-newmail I'm using 1.0b7. Any ideas?

I'm gonna try to give as complete a description as I can. Maybe someone can point me in the right direction, as I haven't seen anything exactly like this. I'm attempting to switch from Workgroup to Domain at work. On a couple machines I did fresh installs of XP, used the registry patch, and succesffully got logons, roaming profiles working. However, when a user attempts to open

Hi I am using Dovecot 0.99.12.1 (just upgraded) on a site with about 1500 mailboxes. One thing I have noticed is when the client outlook express is receiving a large mail via pop3 it gets a time out. There is traffic. If you click on the "wait" button in the dialogue the mail continues to download. This seem to relate to the "Server Timeouts" setting under mail account

Server: Ubuntu 11.10 server with postfix (MTA), dovecot (MDA) Mail client: Outlook Express in Windows XP with IMAP on port 143, SMTP on port 25 When tried to set up a new Outlook Express mail acct, the following error encountered: ? ? ?Your IMAP server wishes to alert you to the following: ? ? ?plaintext authentication not allowed without SSL/TLS, but your client did it anyway. ?If ? ? ?anyone

Hi Manuel, It's been brought to my attention that my usage of the Phabricator Audit tool to track which commits have been reviewed is causing a large number of (almost) empty emails to be sent to the commit authors and anyone else added to the audit as a reviewer. Presumably there are some state change emails that we haven't blocked yet (e.g. the 'Accept commit' and 'Resign

Friends- I have taken a new job and will be moving at the end of March. The newspaper I currently work for is looking for someone to take my place. I have really enjoyed working here. It is a great environment with very nice people to work with. And the best part is you get to develop in Ruby and Rails, for everything! The paper is willing to accept applications from people who would

I am using openssh version 3.6p1 under AIX 5.1. I am trying to change the login herald. I have changed /etc/security/login.cfg, and when logging in via telnet, I see the new herald. When I log in through ssh, using public key authentication, I get the default herald. I am not sure if I am changing the correct file. If I have missed something in the documentation I apologize, but I don't see

> > Message: 6 > Date: Wed, 15 Feb 2006 15:32:46 -0800 > From: Ezra Zygmuntowicz <ezra@yakima-herald.com> > Subject: [Rails] Rubuntu Live CD for Rails > To: Rails Mailing List <rails@lists.rubyonrails.org> > Message-ID: <EBB25945-FF95-4A90-9574-3AB85835B4B2@yakima-herald.com> > Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; delsp=yes; format=flowed > >

On Wed, Jun 25, 2014 at 3:30 PM, John Criswell <criswell at illinois.edu> wrote: > On 6/25/14, 5:15 PM, Vadim Chugunov wrote: > > In a recent review via Phabricator, I was receiving bounce notifications for > mail being sent to llvm-commits because of "Too many recipients to the > message", even though I am a subscriber. I wonder how common is that. > > >

I have seen the "Too many recipients to the message" several times. A limit of 10 includes the patch author and the list leaving just 8 subscribers/reviewers is way too low. Given that these e-mails can be sent only by a Phab. user I'm not sure that spam is a problem at all: A potential spammer would first have to subscribe to Phab. then create a proper diff,... far easier just to

PaulR (sorry again if this is known knowledge) > There's no reason for Herald to be adding project LLVM/subscriber llvm-commits at the last second here. Its possible the rL (LLVM) had be added as the repository in the review on creation rather than rCFE, if thats the case then the herald rule "H270" is going to fire because it see the repository in the review, so add LLVM

This seems to happen for several projects including libcxx, libcxxabi, and libunwind. Shouldn't herald and the commit hooks do the same thing? Here's a link to the rule herald is using: https://reviews.llvm.org/H270 -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: