similar to: local auth

Displaying 20 results from an estimated 20000 matches similar to: "local auth"

[PATCH] run-init: add drop_capabilities support
2012 May 04
2
[PATCH] run-init: add drop_capabilities support
Building on the work in ff0a614bd724f6c4c6a5014a9955dc1bc028f336, this moves the capability code down into the run-init library, so that run-init can use it as well, via the new "-d" flag. Signed-off-by: Kees Cook <kees at outflux.net> --- usr/kinit/Kbuild | 3 +-- usr/kinit/capabilities.h | 10 ++++++++++ usr/kinit/kinit.c | 6 +++---
[Bug 764] fully remove product and version information
2004 Jan 07
13
[Bug 764] fully remove product and version information
http://bugzilla.mindrot.org/show_bug.cgi?id=764 ------- Additional Comments From kees+bugzilla-mindrot at outflux.net 2004-01-07 12:49 ------- Created an attachment (id=523) --> (http://bugzilla.mindrot.org/attachment.cgi?id=523&action=view) Patch to add configurable version information This patch provides the following new fields in sshd_config: ProtoVersionMajor ProtoVersionMinor
Dovecot Setup as just a local IMAP server.
2005 Oct 05
3
Dovecot Setup as just a local IMAP server.
Hey All, Id just like to start by thanking Timo Sirainen and any others that helped produce such a great IMAP server, it was a breeze to set up with no previous experience in mail servers. What I am trying to do is setup a spare computer to run Dovecot and that It stores all my email from my accounts which are all accessed through POP. This way instead of being tied to one mail client (and
[PATCH 0/9] drm: Annotate structs with __counted_by
2023 Oct 02
1
[PATCH 0/9] drm: Annotate structs with __counted_by
On Mon, Oct 02, 2023 at 11:06:19AM -0400, Alex Deucher wrote: > On Mon, Oct 2, 2023 at 5:20?AM Christian K?nig > <ckoenig.leichtzumerken at gmail.com> wrote: > > > > Am 29.09.23 um 21:33 schrieb Kees Cook: > > > On Fri, 22 Sep 2023 10:32:05 -0700, Kees Cook wrote: > > >> This is a batch of patches touching drm for preparing for the coming > >
[PATCH 0/9] drm: Annotate structs with __counted_by
2023 Oct 02
1
[PATCH 0/9] drm: Annotate structs with __counted_by
On Mon, Oct 02, 2023 at 11:06:19AM -0400, Alex Deucher wrote: > On Mon, Oct 2, 2023 at 5:20?AM Christian K?nig > <ckoenig.leichtzumerken at gmail.com> wrote: > > > > Am 29.09.23 um 21:33 schrieb Kees Cook: > > > On Fri, 22 Sep 2023 10:32:05 -0700, Kees Cook wrote: > > >> This is a batch of patches touching drm for preparing for the coming > >
[PATCH 0/9] drm: Annotate structs with __counted_by
2023 Oct 02
1
[PATCH 0/9] drm: Annotate structs with __counted_by
On Mon, Oct 02, 2023 at 11:06:19AM -0400, Alex Deucher wrote: > On Mon, Oct 2, 2023 at 5:20?AM Christian K?nig > <ckoenig.leichtzumerken at gmail.com> wrote: > > > > Am 29.09.23 um 21:33 schrieb Kees Cook: > > > On Fri, 22 Sep 2023 10:32:05 -0700, Kees Cook wrote: > > >> This is a batch of patches touching drm for preparing for the coming > >
[PATCH 0/9] drm: Annotate structs with __counted_by
2023 Oct 02
1
[PATCH 0/9] drm: Annotate structs with __counted_by
On Mon, Oct 2, 2023 at 5:20?AM Christian K?nig <ckoenig.leichtzumerken at gmail.com> wrote: > > Am 29.09.23 um 21:33 schrieb Kees Cook: > > On Fri, 22 Sep 2023 10:32:05 -0700, Kees Cook wrote: > >> This is a batch of patches touching drm for preparing for the coming > >> implementation by GCC and Clang of the __counted_by attribute. Flexible > >> array
[PATCH 0/9] drm: Annotate structs with __counted_by
2023 Oct 02
1
[PATCH 0/9] drm: Annotate structs with __counted_by
On Mon, Oct 2, 2023 at 5:20?AM Christian K?nig <ckoenig.leichtzumerken at gmail.com> wrote: > > Am 29.09.23 um 21:33 schrieb Kees Cook: > > On Fri, 22 Sep 2023 10:32:05 -0700, Kees Cook wrote: > >> This is a batch of patches touching drm for preparing for the coming > >> implementation by GCC and Clang of the __counted_by attribute. Flexible > >> array
[PATCH 0/9] drm: Annotate structs with __counted_by
2023 Oct 02
1
[PATCH 0/9] drm: Annotate structs with __counted_by
On Mon, Oct 2, 2023 at 5:20?AM Christian K?nig <ckoenig.leichtzumerken at gmail.com> wrote: > > Am 29.09.23 um 21:33 schrieb Kees Cook: > > On Fri, 22 Sep 2023 10:32:05 -0700, Kees Cook wrote: > >> This is a batch of patches touching drm for preparing for the coming > >> implementation by GCC and Clang of the __counted_by attribute. Flexible > >> array
[PATCH 0/9] drm: Annotate structs with __counted_by
2023 Oct 02
1
[PATCH 0/9] drm: Annotate structs with __counted_by
On Mon, Oct 02, 2023 at 08:11:41PM +0200, Christian K?nig wrote: > Am 02.10.23 um 20:08 schrieb Kees Cook: > > On Mon, Oct 02, 2023 at 08:01:57PM +0200, Christian K?nig wrote: > > > Am 02.10.23 um 18:53 schrieb Kees Cook: > > > > On Mon, Oct 02, 2023 at 11:06:19AM -0400, Alex Deucher wrote: > > > > > On Mon, Oct 2, 2023 at 5:20?AM Christian K?nig >
[PATCH 0/9] drm: Annotate structs with __counted_by
2023 Oct 02
1
[PATCH 0/9] drm: Annotate structs with __counted_by
On Mon, Oct 02, 2023 at 08:11:41PM +0200, Christian K?nig wrote: > Am 02.10.23 um 20:08 schrieb Kees Cook: > > On Mon, Oct 02, 2023 at 08:01:57PM +0200, Christian K?nig wrote: > > > Am 02.10.23 um 18:53 schrieb Kees Cook: > > > > On Mon, Oct 02, 2023 at 11:06:19AM -0400, Alex Deucher wrote: > > > > > On Mon, Oct 2, 2023 at 5:20?AM Christian K?nig >
[PATCH 0/9] drm: Annotate structs with __counted_by
2023 Oct 02
1
[PATCH 0/9] drm: Annotate structs with __counted_by
On Mon, Oct 02, 2023 at 08:11:41PM +0200, Christian K?nig wrote: > Am 02.10.23 um 20:08 schrieb Kees Cook: > > On Mon, Oct 02, 2023 at 08:01:57PM +0200, Christian K?nig wrote: > > > Am 02.10.23 um 18:53 schrieb Kees Cook: > > > > On Mon, Oct 02, 2023 at 11:06:19AM -0400, Alex Deucher wrote: > > > > > On Mon, Oct 2, 2023 at 5:20?AM Christian K?nig >
[PATCH 0/9] drm: Annotate structs with __counted_by
2023 Oct 05
1
[PATCH 0/9] drm: Annotate structs with __counted_by
Am 02.10.23 um 20:22 schrieb Kees Cook: > On Mon, Oct 02, 2023 at 08:11:41PM +0200, Christian K?nig wrote: >> Am 02.10.23 um 20:08 schrieb Kees Cook: >>> On Mon, Oct 02, 2023 at 08:01:57PM +0200, Christian K?nig wrote: >>>> Am 02.10.23 um 18:53 schrieb Kees Cook: >>>>> On Mon, Oct 02, 2023 at 11:06:19AM -0400, Alex Deucher wrote:
[PATCH 0/9] drm: Annotate structs with __counted_by
2023 Oct 05
1
[PATCH 0/9] drm: Annotate structs with __counted_by
Am 02.10.23 um 20:22 schrieb Kees Cook: > On Mon, Oct 02, 2023 at 08:11:41PM +0200, Christian K?nig wrote: >> Am 02.10.23 um 20:08 schrieb Kees Cook: >>> On Mon, Oct 02, 2023 at 08:01:57PM +0200, Christian K?nig wrote: >>>> Am 02.10.23 um 18:53 schrieb Kees Cook: >>>>> On Mon, Oct 02, 2023 at 11:06:19AM -0400, Alex Deucher wrote:
[PATCH 0/9] drm: Annotate structs with __counted_by
2023 Oct 05
1
[PATCH 0/9] drm: Annotate structs with __counted_by
Am 02.10.23 um 20:22 schrieb Kees Cook: > On Mon, Oct 02, 2023 at 08:11:41PM +0200, Christian K?nig wrote: >> Am 02.10.23 um 20:08 schrieb Kees Cook: >>> On Mon, Oct 02, 2023 at 08:01:57PM +0200, Christian K?nig wrote: >>>> Am 02.10.23 um 18:53 schrieb Kees Cook: >>>>> On Mon, Oct 02, 2023 at 11:06:19AM -0400, Alex Deucher wrote:
[PATCH 0/9] drm: Annotate structs with __counted_by
2023 Sep 29
1
[PATCH 0/9] drm: Annotate structs with __counted_by
On Fri, 22 Sep 2023 10:32:05 -0700, Kees Cook wrote: > This is a batch of patches touching drm for preparing for the coming > implementation by GCC and Clang of the __counted_by attribute. Flexible > array members annotated with __counted_by can have their accesses > bounds-checked at run-time checking via CONFIG_UBSAN_BOUNDS (for array > indexing) and CONFIG_FORTIFY_SOURCE (for
[PATCH 0/9] drm: Annotate structs with __counted_by
2023 Sep 29
1
[PATCH 0/9] drm: Annotate structs with __counted_by
On Fri, 22 Sep 2023 10:32:05 -0700, Kees Cook wrote: > This is a batch of patches touching drm for preparing for the coming > implementation by GCC and Clang of the __counted_by attribute. Flexible > array members annotated with __counted_by can have their accesses > bounds-checked at run-time checking via CONFIG_UBSAN_BOUNDS (for array > indexing) and CONFIG_FORTIFY_SOURCE (for
[PATCH 0/9] drm: Annotate structs with __counted_by
2023 Sep 29
1
[PATCH 0/9] drm: Annotate structs with __counted_by
On Fri, 22 Sep 2023 10:32:05 -0700, Kees Cook wrote: > This is a batch of patches touching drm for preparing for the coming > implementation by GCC and Clang of the __counted_by attribute. Flexible > array members annotated with __counted_by can have their accesses > bounds-checked at run-time checking via CONFIG_UBSAN_BOUNDS (for array > indexing) and CONFIG_FORTIFY_SOURCE (for
[PATCH 0/9] drm: Annotate structs with __counted_by
2023 Oct 02
1
[PATCH 0/9] drm: Annotate structs with __counted_by
Am 02.10.23 um 18:53 schrieb Kees Cook: > On Mon, Oct 02, 2023 at 11:06:19AM -0400, Alex Deucher wrote: >> On Mon, Oct 2, 2023 at 5:20?AM Christian K?nig >> <ckoenig.leichtzumerken at gmail.com> wrote: >>> Am 29.09.23 um 21:33 schrieb Kees Cook: >>>> On Fri, 22 Sep 2023 10:32:05 -0700, Kees Cook wrote: >>>>> This is a batch of patches
[PATCH 0/9] drm: Annotate structs with __counted_by
2023 Oct 02
1
[PATCH 0/9] drm: Annotate structs with __counted_by
Am 02.10.23 um 18:53 schrieb Kees Cook: > On Mon, Oct 02, 2023 at 11:06:19AM -0400, Alex Deucher wrote: >> On Mon, Oct 2, 2023 at 5:20?AM Christian K?nig >> <ckoenig.leichtzumerken at gmail.com> wrote: >>> Am 29.09.23 um 21:33 schrieb Kees Cook: >>>> On Fri, 22 Sep 2023 10:32:05 -0700, Kees Cook wrote: >>>>> This is a batch of patches