similar to: Hardlinks in copy

On Mon, 17 Feb 2003, Andreas Aardal Hanssen wrote: > >> It even recently included a POP server. What's the reasoning there? > >Someone wanted it so it'd be easy to run both POP3 and IMAP servers > >without having to configure them twice. I don't see any harm in it > >anyway, it took only few hours to write, it's optional and doesn't take >

> >Message: 2 >Date: Wed, 18 Jun 2003 13:21:08 +0200 (CEST) >From: Andreas Aardal Hanssen <dovecot at andreas.hanssen.name> >Subject: Re: [Dovecot] Multiple auth howto >To: Dovecot mailing list <dovecot at procontrol.fi> >Message-ID: > <Pine.LNX.4.44.0306181319060.29812-100000 at shusaku.troll.no> >Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII > >On

hi, what do you tyhink about it? especially the faq comment about dovecot? http://www.bincimap.andreas.hanssen.name/ -- Levente "Si vis pacem para bellum!"

I attempted an upgrade from 1.1.7 to 1.1.15 and encountered an apparent regression in handling gzipped maildir files. I have tried to narrow down the conditions under which it happens and reproduce it with as simple a case as possible. The actual mail application that exposed this problem is Squirrelmail. Starting off with the index files removed from the "Folder" maildir directory: *

Hi all, I'm not so sure it is about to dovecot, but any thoughts will be appreciated. I have an email account configured as IMAP(dovecot-1.2.10) via outlook 2010. If I'm creating a *new* mailbox folder, for example "ttt", and *copying* a mail into *that* mailbox folder, then an error message window will be displayed. The problem caused by C:UID FETCH 0 (UID FLAGS

Mulberry client-side message filtering can be persuaded to search for a nonexistent message ... <tag> UID SEARCH UNSEEN UNDELETED UNDRAFT 12 (OR FROM "Cron Daemon <sthen at eeyore.37.spacehopper.org>" SUBJECT "Cron <sthen at wide> /home/sthen/pingme") Dovecot 0.99.10 returns this ... <tag> NO Sequence out of range: 12 I *think* the correct

Hi. It seems that dovecot is using the current time, not a maildir file's mtime for INTERNALDATE when a message is re-indexed: $ cd Index $ rm -rf .INBOX $ cd ../Maildir/cur $ stat * File: `1392914632.P54451Q0M08633.smtpin01,S=2215,W=2249:2,' Size: 960 Blocks: 8 IO Block: 1048576 regular file Device: 36h/54d Inode: 11132959 Links: 1 Access: (0600/-rw-------)

On Mon, 2003-02-17 at 08:28, Andreas Aardal Hanssen wrote: > I wonder what the motives for the author of Dovecot IMAP was when he > started his project. Lack of securely written code in other servers, although Courier did prove to be quite secure after all. > I wouldn't want to comment on Dovecot's design, since I'm no fan of > trolling. I don't think commenting is

On Mon, 2003-02-17 at 11:33, Andreas Aardal Hanssen wrote: > Binc IMAP's approaches are to use a secure programming language with > secure well-known contructs, and with an as-simple-as-possible design, > making it very easy for everyone to grasp how the server works. This will > also help the community find and fix bugs. I kind of agree, but not at the expense of security. I have

Timo Sirainen wrote: > On Fri, 2007-10-05 at 17:27 -0700, Jeff Grossman wrote: > >> Timo Sirainen wrote: >> >>> On Tue, 2007-10-02 at 18:12 -0700, Jeff Grossman wrote: >>> >>> >>>> So, what would >>>> have changed between version 1.0.5 and 1.1beta2 to somehow make the >>>> phone think all of the messages are older

Has anyone else encountered weird date behavior with mbox-style folders? I am nearly ready to bite the bullet and convert my UW imap hierarchy (which is in mbx format) to Dovecot. In so doing, I need to convert each UW-specific mbx-format mailboxes to the more portable mbox format, which Dovecot can read. (This is done with the 'mbxcvt' utility that's part of UW.) I am then

Hi, we have experienced some erratic behavior from Dovecot 2.0.15 if a user's INBOX is shared. Some folders of user1, including the INBOX, have been shared using these IMAP commands: . login user1 XXXXXX . setacl INBOX user2 lrwstiekx . setacl box-a user2 lrwstiekx Now if we use telnet to log in as user2 and select "shared/user1", it will contain the same mails as

Hi, If an IMAP fetch is issued some "short" time after a message was delivered with dovecot deliver then dovecot reports wrong (zero) values for that new message. Afterward, it reports the information OK. This causes problems to our IMAP client. The problem is easily reproduced with a large message on a slow machine. I'm using dovecot 1.0.10 Here's a sample trace: 1 uid fetch

> bclark wrote: > > > The interesting thing is, once I have some mail on the dovecot, > the date > > displayed on Mozilla is correct, but the mail shown throught > outlook, > > shows todays date (thats for all mail). > > Each mail has (at least) two dates : the date it was sent (stored > in the > headers), and the date it arrived (in Maildir, the

Tried sending this message with the original topic On Mon, 17 Feb 2003, Andreas Aardal Hanssen wrote: > Hi, Ian. Cross-posting discussions like this is usually not appreciated > by those who subscribe to both foras, so I'll limit it to the Dovecot > list. Mea culpa. That was an inadvertent mess-up on my part; I did not see the headers, usually going by the list's reply-to

I''m wondering if the new Dell Precision 490 workstation is/looks to be VT-ready, planning it for SuSE10.1/Xen and unmodifies Windows guest? From the system specs: 1-2 Dual-Core Intel Xeon 5000 series 64-bit processors Intel 5000X chipset Windows XP/Vista or Redhat EWS4 Linux

Hi all, Robert, Jerry, There were new emails overnight and both Thunderbird and Roundcube displayed them. I enabled Outlook debug mode and please find 2 logs of Send/Receive with no new emails. Scroll below to see 3rd log with "workaround" and mails downloaded. "Intializing connection [1C7E2830] IMAP: 08:53:03 [db] Setting internal codepage to 1200 IMAP: 08:53:03 [db]

Hi All! I realized that I have only e-mails from last 13 days. I see that I have lots more in the cur folder inside my Maildir folder. The problem is that I cannot see them. Permissions seems to be right: drwx------ 2 gaguilar gaguilar 1081344 2010-05-28 12:53 cur -rw------- 1 gaguilar gaguilar 4798145 2010-05-28 12:52 deliver.info -rw------- 1 gaguilar gaguilar 0 2010-04-17 21:17

Hi, I am still getting strange creation and mailbox lookups from 0.99.11-test7. dovecot creates in ~/Maildir/ .INBOX/ .imap.index .imap.index.cache .imap.index.log .customflags dovecot-uidlist .INBOX seems to be a reference to ~/Maildir/{cur,new,tmp} yet I

Is there a way to get dovecot to send automatic flag updates? I notice that when I have two clients connected and one of them reads a new message, the server sends a status update which contains the number of unseen messages, but doesn't specifically say which ones have changed. I think the solution to this problem, while not wasting bandwidth, is to issue a unilateral FETCH FLAGS response