similar to: Starting Dovecot?

Hi everyone I have been trying to get Dovecot installed with OpenSSL support, but no matter what I do, when I run Configure, it says "Building with SSL support.........No". I have even tried configure --with-ssl=openssl, to no avail. I have built and installed OpenSSL, and libssl.so and libcrypto.so are in the /lib directory - what more does Dovecot want? I have tried figuring it out

Sorry, I didn't check all my logs. PAM password DB was not found - it was in syslog. Les ______________________________________ Leslie Viljoen Africa Missions Systems Administrator Cell: 0836186100 Work: 011 6991700 Fax: 011 7945522

NOTE: in order to apply this patch you should: git mv btrfsck.c cmd-fsck.c This patch moves btrfsck in to "btrfs fsck". It also adds support for symlinks to the btrfs binary to retain compablity, =) I think something should be done to the help description but i''m not sure what... Anyway, feedback is welcome. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe

Hi all again... I did a chroot patch with ability to change uid and gid. I dunno if you all approve with the current implementation but the patch is small and it works here. remember to CC, since i'm not on this ml... //Ian Kumlien PS. To anyone on vorbis-dev, I'm *REALLY* sorry must be tired or something.. =) DS. <p><p><p> -------------- next part -------------- A

Hi, I have problems reading some mail with the latest version of dovecot. I use maildir etc but it all worked before... It seems like dovecot sends something that throws Evolution off the track since the actual information is sent, but in a broken form it seems. I also get some odd chars (this is raw tcp packet decoding): "??a-? "??c-?* FLAGS (\Answered \Flagged \Deleted \Seen

https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=96802 Bug ID: 96802 Summary: Upgrading mesa from 11.0.6 -> 11.2.2 causes graphics deadlock Product: Mesa Version: 11.2 Hardware: x86-64 (AMD64) OS: Linux (All) Status: NEW Severity: major Priority: medium Component:

Lots of bounces from you, I'm moving this subscription to new address.. On Wed, 2003-07-09 at 22:15, mailman-bounces at procontrol.fi wrote: > The attached message was received as a bounce, but either the bounce > format was not recognized, or no member addresses could be extracted > from it. This mailing list has been configured to send all > unrecognized bounce messages to the

https://bugzilla.netfilter.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1145 Bug ID: 1145 Summary: nft 0.7: expression.c:966: range_expr_value_low: Assertion '0' failed. Product: nftables Version: unspecified Hardware: x86_64 OS: Gentoo Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P5

https://bugzilla.netfilter.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1248 Bug ID: 1248 Summary: The rr-load-balance part doesn't actually work on 0.7 Product: nftables Version: unspecified Hardware: x86_64 OS: All Status: NEW Severity: minor Priority: P5 Component: nft Assignee: pablo at

https://bugzilla.netfilter.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1253 Bug ID: 1253 Summary: interface wildcard in variables causes Error: Byteorder mismatch: expected big endian, got host endian Product: nftables Version: unspecified Hardware: x86_64 OS: All Status: NEW Severity:

https://bugzilla.netfilter.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1238 Bug ID: 1238 Summary: meta limits protocols when it shouldn't Product: nftables Version: unspecified Hardware: x86_64 OS: Fedora Status: NEW Severity: minor Priority: P5 Component: nft Assignee: pablo at netfilter.org

I can run nmbd successfully, but smbd dies almost immediately when I run it, the smbd.log file has the message "bind failed on port 139 socket_addr = 0.0.0.0.". When I do a netstat -an | grep 139, it shows that tcp is listening on port 139. How do I resolve this conflict between tcp and smbd?

I'm running samba 4.1.2 on Linux Mint 15. Getting the following: ? ./samba-tool drs kcc samba-realm Failed to connect host 192.168.231.132 on port 135 - NT_STATUS_CONNECTION_REFUSED Failed to connect host 192.168.231.132 (samba-realm) on port 135 - NT_STATUS_CONNECTION_REFUSED. I don't see samba or smbd listening on port 135. 53 and 137 are. e.g.: ? netstat -anp | grep samba | grep

The data set (called 'chemdata') has 6 columns (4 factors, 1 date, 1 numeric) and I need to create subsets for each of one of the factors ('stream'). This has worked flawlessly for all but two streams which were created yesterday. The command I use to create the subsets is like this: > rnchH <- subset(chemdata, stream == 'RanchSpgsH', select = c(site, sampdate,

Hy everybody, I have a little problem. Since a crash of my server we have problems to connect over the RSAT tools to our Samba 4 domain with the DNS tool. At the moment we have a Centos 6.5 server with Version 4.1.6-SerNet-RedHat-7.el6. If I connect to the AD server with the RSAT tool, i get this message in the log.smb: dnsserver: Found DNS zone _msdcs.nagy-blumen.at [2014/03/17

Hi, I have already tried to change for bindaddr=0.0.0.0 but it didn't worked. 2016-08-26 11:44 GMT-03:00, Frank Vanoni <mailinglist at linuxista.com>: > On Fri, 2016-08-26 at 10:12 -0300, Vitor Mazuco wrote: > >> bindaddr = all > > Try: > > bindaddr=0.0.0.0 > > > > > -- > _____________________________________________________________________

Hi, see the log below root at AsteriskSlave:~# ip addr 1: lo: <LOOPBACK,UP,LOWER_UP> mtu 65536 qdisc noqueue state UNKNOWN group default link/loopback 00:00:00:00:00:00 brd 00:00:00:00:00:00 inet 127.0.0.1/8 scope host lo valid_lft forever preferred_lft forever inet6 ::1/128 scope host valid_lft forever preferred_lft forever 2: p3p1: <BROADCAST,MULTICAST> mtu

Regarding this I've read the specs linked to in detail, but I can find no mention anywhere of any change that implies or states that no ring time will be recorded anymore in Asterisk 13 and that all times in start and answer columns will now be equal for all calls. Can this be because I nowhere use the Answer() application in my dialplan when dialing out? -----Original Message----- From:

Hello everyone, I'm using the very good imaptest [0] tool to test my little imap server implementation. I've tried to use the dovecot-crlf [1] file, but it looks like there are some major issues : $ grep -n "In-Reply-To.*;" tests/data/dovecot-crlf 479:In-Reply-To: <20020806175441.GA7148 at linux.taugt.net>; from rueckert at informatik.uni-rostock.de on Tue, Aug 06, 2002

Hi, I''m a home user who doesn''t understand the workings of the Shorewall firewall (or the linux OS on which I''ve just installed it) very well. Having just installed Shorewall 1.4.6c with a default "home user" configuration I gave it a run against the online ShieldsUp scan. Main surprise was that the ICMP echo was enabled. I''ve since gone into