similar to: gnbd help on centos

Hi all, I am trying to configure a failover multipath between 2 GNBD devices. I have a 4 nodes Redhat Cluster Suite (RCS) cluster. 3 of them are used for running services, 1 of them for central storage. In the future I am going to introduce another machine for central storage. The 2 storage machine are going to share/export the same disk. The idea is not to have a single point of failure

Hello all: I'm having a strange problem with GNBD and LVM on two fully updated CentOS 5.5 x86_64 systems. On node1, I have exported a gnbd volume. lvcreate -L 500M -n mirrortest_lv01 mirrorvg gnbd_serv gnbd_export -d /dev/mirrorvg/mirrortest_lv01 -e node1_lv01 On node2 I have imported the volume: gnbd_import -i node1 Next, on node2 I attempt to create a mirrored LV with the

Wondering if anyone can point me in the right direction for automating the whole gnbd process. Thanks in advance i.e gnbd_serv gnbd_export gnbd_import modprobe gnbd _______________________________________________ Xen-users mailing list Xen-users@lists.xensource.com http://lists.xensource.com/xen-users

Hey, I am trying to migrate Xen VM from 1 physical m/c to another. I have instll GNBD and done the following. VM1 to be exported: nbd_serv -n service gfs stop gnbd_export -c -d /dev/sda1 -e global_diskVM1 gnbd_export -l Domain 0 of other machine: depmod -a modprobe gfs modprobe gnbd modprobe lock_dlm service gfs start gnbd_import -i <ip adress of VM1> -n cd /dev/gnbd I see the

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Up until now, I have been using drbd for file custers with great success. Yes, it is a PITA, and sometimes you can get annoying sincronization issues (mostly on lab situations). Now I have been considering giving gnbd (with cs/gfs) a try. Do any of you ever crossed this path ? Any comparisons or comments ? TIA, - -- Rodrigo Barbosa "Quid

Send CentOS-announce mailing list submissions to centos-announce at centos.org To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-announce or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to centos-announce-request at centos.org You can reach the person managing the list at centos-announce-owner at centos.org When

Hi all, I am trying to install csgfs on two CentOS hosts. I have installed latest kernel from updates repository. But when I try to install csgfs, yum returns me this: Dependencies Resolved ============================================================================= Package Arch Version Repository Size

Hi, I am using this document along with the following links to try and assemble a GFS set of mahcines: 1. Log on as the root user. 2. Run up2date --installall --channel Label for Red Hat Cluster Suite. The following example shows running the command for i386 RPMs: # up2date --installall --channel rhel-i386-as-4-cluster 3. (Optional) If you are

CentOS Errata and Security Advisory 2006-0201-1 CentOS 4 i386 Cluster Suite / Global File System Update The CESA is an update to the csgfs repository only and not the main CentOS-4 repository. This CESA is issued to upgrade Cluster Suite 4 and Global File System 6.1 to use the 2.6.9-22.0.2.EL CentOS-4 kernel. It updates to all CS/GFS packages to the latest versions. The following files are

CentOS Errata and Security Advisory 2006-0201-1 CentOS 4 x86_64 Cluster Suite / Global File System Update The CESA is an update to the csgfs repository only and not the main CentOS-4 repository. This CESA is issued to upgrade Cluster Suite 4 and Global File System 6.1 to use the 2.6.9-22.0.2.EL CentOS-4 kernel. It updates to all CS/GFS packages to the latest versions. The following files are

I am considering building a pair of storage servers that will be using CentOS and GFS to share the storage from a Coraid (SATA+Raid) EtherDrive shelf. Has anyone else tried such a setup? Is GFS stable enough to use in a production environment? There is a build of GFS 6.1 at http://rpm.karan.org/el4/csgfs/. Has anyone used this? Is it stable? Will I run into any problems if I use CentOS 3.5

Now that the csgfs repo has been updated to support the new kernel, I'm looking at doing updates again. I just want to do it without breaking things (if possible). I can handle doing a bit of trial and error, but I figure that if you guys can point out any obvious pitfalls, that can save me quite a bit of time. I'm looking at doing the following install/update:

Hi all, Where i want to arrive: 1) having two storage server replicating partition with DRBD 2) exporting via GNBD from the primary server the drbd with GFS2 3) inporting the GNBD on some nodes and mount it with GFS2 Assuming no logical error are done in the last points logic this is the situation: Server 1: LogVol09, DRDB configured as /dev/drbd0 replicated to Server 2. DRBD seems to work

CentOS Errata and Bugfix Advisory 2007:0953 Upstream details at : https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2007-0953.html The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently syncing to the mirrors: ( md5sum Filename ) i386: 4e3a0ef4b2ed1019df88196f418c86b7 kmod-gnbd-0.1.3-4.2.6.18_8.1.14.el5.i686.rpm 7eb54b0cee9bd23cf4eb3e0b98c10205 kmod-gnbd-PAE-0.1.3-4.2.6.18_8.1.14.el5.i686.rpm

CentOS Errata and Bugfix Advisory 2007:0977 Upstream details at : https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2007-0977.html The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently syncing to the mirrors: ( md5sum Filename ) i386: 3308267c6757d7219f6c6b0df781c78c kmod-gnbd-0.1.3-4.2.6.18_8.1.15.el5.i686.rpm 936ca942c0bcf7e7a20e2a489e8d9d49 kmod-gnbd-PAE-0.1.3-4.2.6.18_8.1.15.el5.i686.rpm

CentOS Errata and Bugfix Advisory 2007:0885 Upstream details at : https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2007-0885.html The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently syncing to the mirrors: ( md5sum Filename ) i386: c8c9a11857ac481dbcb1a9a1304f1833 kmod-gnbd-0.1.3-4.2.6.18_8.1.10.el5.i686.rpm 926604b20cf494d3e6c0a30d0cd7368b kmod-gnbd-PAE-0.1.3-4.2.6.18_8.1.10.el5.i686.rpm

Hello I read about the technology and i found all amazing and great challenger, i like to test and install soon---, for this reason i have some question about this. GFS / CS I see the gfs and cs download into http://bender.it.swin.edu.au/centos-3/ and http://mirrors.csol.org/CentOS/3/csgfs/i386/RPMS/ What are the diference in both packages? Anyone has using this technologies? and example of

CentOS Errata and Bugfix Advisory 2007:0953 Upstream details at : https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2007-0953.html The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently syncing to the mirrors: ( md5sum Filename ) x86_64: 33ba3b44c574c0749ada598ba3ff74d0 kmod-gnbd-0.1.3-4.2.6.18_8.1.14.el5.x86_64.rpm 0c15de12384cc4b4130576fe2a3b3ffc

CentOS Errata and Bugfix Advisory 2007:0977 Upstream details at : https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2007-0977.html The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently syncing to the mirrors: ( md5sum Filename ) x86_64: a063f498832ca79bf139ad3e05b3c374 kmod-gnbd-0.1.3-4.2.6.18_8.1.15.el5.x86_64.rpm 9b1d8cdb61fcef11aa72a4dd4b75dc1e

CentOS Errata and Bugfix Advisory 2007:0885 Upstream details at : https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2007-0885.html The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently syncing to the mirrors: ( md5sum Filename ) x86_64: 0a4e96f62cb787b49ebde18a41f9d4ea kmod-gnbd-0.1.3-4.2.6.18_8.1.10.el5.x86_64.rpm 7f4022b8524043e4e6d2cc8d8d827c55