similar to: stubbing gets undone?

Hi James, An instance retains its mocha between tests if that instance is pointed to by a constant. The simplest failing test is something like (add as a new file in mocha/test).. #--code-- require File.join(File.dirname(__FILE__), "test_helper") require ''stubba'' class WemStubbaTest < Test::Unit::TestCase Arr = [1, 2, 3] def test_a

Hey all, I have a question with using mocha in my tests. In the same test file, I have two tests, <code> def test_a klass.any_instance.stubs(:method_name).returns("something") klass.new.method_name ... end def test_b ... klass.new.method_name ... end </code> where klass is some class when the tests run, test _a passes, but test_b had an error like this:

We''re using Mocha stubs to stub out a slow-performing network request in a Test::Unit class. But naturally, we don''t want to stub it out in the few tests that actually verify the functionality of that network request. Is there a way to do the stub in "setup", but override it for the few tests that need the original functionality? (I realize that in this case, the

Hi guys, I''m running mocha (0.3.2) against Rails core and just found an issue where the mock doesn''t go away after the test is run. For example: def test_reset_bang_doesn_reinstall_named_routes ActionController::Routing::Routes.named_routes.expects(:install).never @session.reset! end def test_zzz puts ActionController::Routing::Routes.named_routes.inspect

Hi I''m building a small library to use in my Rails app which interacts with a 3rd party API. It fetches artists and tracks. So I have: lib/my_lib.rb lib/my_lib/artist.rb lib/my_lib/track.rb To get an artist I do artist = MyLib::Artist.find("Oasis") Which returns an instance of Artist if it finds (via 3rd party API) it or nil otherwise. Then I can call artist.tracks which

Okay, so awhile back I had a problem with Steam. It wouldn't start and so I fixed that after installing a minimal version of winetricks (I removed a few things I knew I wouldn't need). Then Steam worked. Unfortunately I then had a problem with Team Fortress 2. This time the game wouldn't load. So I read the AppDB for Team Fortress 2 again and it said to disable Steam Community

# Have no other connections opened yet > showConnections() class description mode text isopen can read can write > sink("tempfile") > close(getConnection(3)) > cat("send some output\n") Error in stdout() : invalid connection > sink() Error in sink() : invalid connection > cat("send some output\n") Error in stdout() : invalid connection >

# Have no other connections opened yet > showConnections() class description mode text isopen can read can write > sink("tempfile") > close(getConnection(3)) > cat("send some output\n") Error in stdout() : invalid connection > sink() Error in sink() : invalid connection > cat("send some output\n") Error in stdout() : invalid connection >

Hi Folks, Troll trumps your existing ActiveResource mocking libraries like inbuilt HttpMock,Fakeweb or Webmock out of water. With Troll, ActiveResource mocking just works, some of its features: 1. Don''t need to mock calls at Net::HTTP level (which webmock,fakeweb do). Really, we don''t care what HTTP library ActiveResource uses, fakeweb and webmock bring additional complexity

https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=105916 Bug ID: 105916 Summary: "xset dpms force off" can't be undone on hp omen 17-an0xx laptop Product: xorg Version: git Hardware: x86-64 (AMD64) OS: Linux (All) Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: medium

Please understand in the following that I am making relatively minor changes to legacy (non-TDD/BDD) code in Substruct and don''t have the time to refactor nicely right now. I''m just trying to get past the untested/un-speced cruft quickly to write the spec for my new code, so I''m looking for expediency over prettiness. I''m specifying before( :each ) do

I''m doing RSpec controller testing with CanCan authorization, and I''m seeing something I''ve never seen in RSpec before: the same test run twice fails on the second one. I am NOT doing before(:all) or other things that should cause state to persist between tests: Here''s the relevant code: context "POST create" do context "with user logged

I have two models with a straightforward has_many / belongs_to relationship: class Premise < ActiveRecord::Base has_many :metered_services, :dependent => :destroy ... end class MeteredService < ActiveRecord::Base belongs_to :premise ... end and nested routes to match: Demo::Application.routes.draw do devise_for :users resources :premises do resources :metered_services

partial code : http://pastie.org/3186140 I want to test a HTTP server, I''m using lower level stuff so I can understand whats going on, then I might move onto FakeWeb/WebMock/etc Its a reverse proxy, so it doesn''t generate the page content. I want to test a/ methods in the class in isolation b/ test that if a HTTP request sent in generates a HTTP request out (suppose should be

RSpecrs, I''ve been running into some trouble lately when passing mock objects into rich views. Either I have to obscure my specs by stubbing every method the view would call on my object, or I have to resort to trickery like stubbing ActionController#render, which is also less than ideal. The solution I''ve some up with is a variant on the :null_object option that can be passed

Our network is connected to a cablemodem using a dynamic DNS service to resolve our address. The Asterisk server has been alternately set up behind a NAT router and without a NAT router -- that is, with two NICs, one of which is providing NAT to the rest of the network; the office SIPs are behind that with static private IP addresses. Off-premise SIPs are all behind simple NAT routers.

On Dec 14, 2013, at 11:27, David Blaikie <dblaikie at gmail.com> wrote: > (+llvmdev) > > > On Sat, Dec 14, 2013 at 11:02 AM, Adrian Prantl <aprantl at apple.com> wrote: > Hi David, > > I just bisected a debug info problem we were experiencing down to your legendary commit: > Revert "Revert "Revert "Revert "DebugInfo: Omit debug info for

(+llvmdev) On Sat, Dec 14, 2013 at 11:02 AM, Adrian Prantl <aprantl at apple.com> wrote: > Hi David, > > I just bisected a debug info problem we were experiencing down to your > legendary commit: > Revert "Revert "Revert "Revert "DebugInfo: Omit debug info for dynamic > classes in TUs that do not have the vtable for that class"”""

How does one generate a form within a view using javascript? Specifically, assume views/premise/new.html.erb looks like this: <%= form_for(Premise.new) do |f| %> <%= f.hidden_field :full_address, :value => $FULL_ADDRESS %> <%= f.hidden_field :geocoding, :value => $GEOCODING %> <%= f.submit :value => "use this address" %> <%= f.label

Ned, Thank you very much for the response. Great example following through on the premise. It sounds like I need to have a better understanding of the traffic patterns on my network to know the optimal order for iptables filtering rules. My brief example - Premise: I want to limit outsiders from interfering with LAN client machines. So, I have the following rules regarding forwarding traffic: