similar to: htaccess htpasswd and satellite connections

I'm hitting a snag with htaccess. Have created .htaccess and .htpasswd files, set up apache directory options just like always... the exact same setup works fine on CentOS 3, but I can't seem to get it to authenticate on CentOS 4? Am I just being blind stupid (as in not seeing something 'exactly the same') or is there something different I'm missing? I have selinux running

Hi, I'm trying to password protect one of my web accessable directories and I can't get .htaccess to work in a Centos 5.1 box Here's what I did I created an .htaccess file with the contents: AuthName "Restricted Area" AuthType Basic AuthUserFile /home/mysite/.htpasswd AuthGroupFile /dev/null require valid-user and I uploaded it to the dir I want to protect. Then I

Hello, I'm new here, and after trying by myself, I'm looking for some help ... I have installed webalizer, on my CentOS 6 server. Root path for webalizer is /var/www/usage/ It's working, but after putting a .htaccess in /var/www/usage/ and the appropriate .htpasswd in /var/www/html/auth/ there is no password asked. Here are my files : .htacess : AuthName ?Veuillez vous

While my site is in development I wish to add basic password protection. At the moment my .htaccess looks like this: AuthName "Restricted Area" AuthType Basic AuthUserFile /home/httpd/mydomain.co.uk/.htpasswd AuthGroupFile /dev/null require valid-user .htpasswd exists and has an entry, yet I do not get a password prompt? Does Apache Auth work for dynamic resources or only static

Hi All, Where is the proper place to put .htpasswd so I can password protect directories in /var/www/html? /etc/httpd/run? -Jason

Hello. I tried to create an access file with 'htpasswd -c /etc/httpd/conf/myfile.htaccess testuser'. In the SSL directory I have put a .htaccess file containing the followings: AuthUserFile /etc/httpd/conf/myfile.htaccess AuthName "Mydomain" AuthType Basic require valid-user This worked with CentOS 3. Now with CentOS 4, apache version 2.0.52, the access to the page is

I have apache running with virtual hosting. I have a customer who wants to password protect their /user/public_html directory using htaccess. I've done this many times on directories inside of that directory with positive results. However, I don't seem to be able to password protect the document root directory. Any ideas? John Hinton

Hi, I?m trying to set up a private family web site for genealogy, and want to set up Apache Authorization access control for this site, and once the user has logged in has access to the entire site. I?ve been reading the info at http://httpd.apache.org/docs/2.2/howto/auth.html to learn how to do this. I?m just planning on passing out the same username and password to all family members and

Hi! What is the easiest way to restrict access to some part of the page? In php i just put .htaccess and .htpasswd files in /admin folder and it worked. Now i''ve got one admin folder for controllers, one for views, public folder and i''m not really sure if it''s still possible. So what is the easiest way? I don''t have any user logging features on my site,

I don't think it's the path of htpasswd that's the problem but here it is anyway: /usr/bin/htpasswd. The problem is more likely that the directory you're trying to create the password file in with the command "htpasswd -c /passwd/passwords famsite" doesn't exist. Iain Lee -- This message has been scanned for viruses and dangerous content by MailScanner, and is

Hi For the admin pages (which in my case update/delete News) how do I secure the pages. I am used to PHP and normally secure the whole folder using HTPASSWD HTACCESS files Thanks -- Posted via http://www.ruby-forum.com/.

Situation: We are providing hosting services. I've grown tired of the various kiddie scripts/dictionary attacks on various services. The latest has been against vsftpd, on systems that I can't easily control vs. putting strict limits on ssh. We simply have too many users entering from too many networks many with dynamic IP addresses. Enter.... thinking about LIDS or Log Based

OK, so I did an upgrade to PHP 5.3 on one of my servers. I noticed the uninstall of php also removed SquirrelMail and it won't install under PHP 5.3. Has anybody worked this out with a good RPM or repo solution? -- John Hinton 877-777-1407 ext 502 http://www.ew3d.com Comprehensive Online Solutions

I've been seeing some random Proliant DL380 G4 64bit crashes. Each time, on the console are messages relating tojbd2/cciss and something about a waitfor 120 seconds. Is anybody else seeing anything like this? Oddly, I can't seem to find this in the logs. I guess it can't write when this happens. -- John Hinton 877-777-1407 ext 502 http://www.ew3d.com Comprehensive Online

Hello, I'm in the process of launching a site (http://www.intraspect.com <http://www.intraspect.com/> ). I'm using rsync to synchronize between our staging server and our production server. All of my files are uploading correctly except for a couple of .htpasswd files which reside in /var/apache/webscripts I'm guessing that they won't upload because they start with

OK, so does anybody have a good firewall rule solution for what we're supposed to be doing with bind these days? Obviously port 53 is no longer enough. TIA John Hinton

Does anybody have a working version of tcptrack running on Centos 6 x64? The rpmforge rpm installs and runs on the -t eth# command, but if you add a port to it, it bombs with a pcap compile error. It runs fine for me on Centos 5 x64, but seems to have what looks like an old bug reintroduced in 6. -- John Hinton 877-777-1407 ext 502 http://www.ew3d.com Comprehensive Online Solutions

Had anybody been successful in getting Pyzor to run on CentOS 6 64bit? I have it running fine on CentOS 6 32 bit, and I 'think' I did identical installs. But, from the command line I keep getting Oct 6 13:36:00.659 [16065] dbg: pyzor: network tests on, attempting Pyzor Oct 6 13:36:06.205 [16065] dbg: pyzor: pyzor is available: /usr/bin/pyzor Oct 6 13:36:06.206 [16065] dbg: pyzor:

I'm running bind in a chroot environment. It seems that since the Redhat snafu which wrecked bind (yes, I had caching nameserver running as well but not anymore) I have been having problem with my slave nameservers retrieving updates from the master. Looking at the zone records, some are owned by root, some are owned by named. I'm now confused as to what the ownership should be and

I'm trying to get usable reports out of logwatch on this new system. Looks like the reports are running in an 'unformatted' mode under Postfix/Amavisd. I found a couple of programs, postfix-logwatch and amavisd-logwatch. These sound promising. I am running Amavisd as the frontend to Postfix. Is anybody running either of these as a logwatch filter? If so, is it repetitive to run