similar to: cbind giving NA's?

[originally reported for ZFS on FreeBSD but Pawel Jakub Dawid says this problem also exists on Solaris hence this email.] Summary: on ZFS, overhead for reading a hole seems far worse than actual reading from a disk. Small buffers are used to make this overhead more visible. I ran the following script on both ZFS and UF2 filesystems. [Note that on FreeBSD cat uses a 4k buffer and md5 uses a 1k

Hi, all. I have a simple design I'm comparing to output from SPSS. the design is 1 repeated measure (session) and 1 between measure (cond). my dependent measure is rl. here is the data I'm using (in a data.frame): mig <- data.frame(subj=factor(rep(subj,3)), cond=factor(rep(cond,3)), session=factor(c(rep(1,nsubj),rep(2,nsubj),rep(3,nsubj))),

Need some assistance with animation again... When I run the drawing code in a separate thread, it''s slow as heck. I think it may be because the drawing thread isn''t getting enough time from the thread scheduler. I was able to reproduce the problem in my little sample program simply by increasing the number of lines it draws per update. I''m lucky to get one frame

Dear R-help, I am having trouble with your scatterplot3d program. For help with this problem I was directed to your address by Martin Maechler at " r-core-bounces at r-project.org." I'm also sending a CC to " r-core-owner at r-project.org" as I'm not yet certain of the proper address to use for this. I have R version 2.8.1 and have downloaded 'scatterplot3d.'

Dear Jim, Here is again exactly what I did and with the output of Rprof (with this reduced dataset and with a simpler function, it is here much faster than in real life). Thanks you again for your help! ## CODE ## mydata1<- structure(list(species = structure(1:8, .Label = c("alsen","gogor", "loalb", "mafas", "pacyn", "patro",

## The following corrects what I believe to have been an error in my previous post: #### Two time series questions: I. FITTING TRANSFER FUNCTIONS WITH LAGS: Consider the following toy example: > dates <- paste(11:21, "/01/2005", sep="") > Dates <- as.Date(dates, "%d/%m/%Y") > set.seed(1) > DF <- data.frame(date=Dates, y=rnorm(11),

Below are the results for the Polyhedron 2005 benchmarks compiled with the llvm/compiler-rt/dragonegg 3.3 release and 3.4svn against FSF gcc 4.8.2. The *-stock-de runs omit the -fplugin-arg-dragonegg-enable-gcc-optzns flag and the *-de-optnz runs include it. There seems to be little improvement between llvm 3.3 and 3.4 in the stock case which relies entirely on llvm for vectorization. Duncan, has

Hi [macOSX 10.4.6; R-2.3.0] I have encountered a difference in behaviour between R-2.2.1 and R-2.3.0 when performing a linear model. Transcript follows for R-2.3.0 (R-2.2.1 worked as expected). How to make R-2.3.0 perform as R-2.2.1 did? > dput(x) c(29.13, 29.88, 30.09, 29.99, 29.74, 29.64, 29.65, 29.7, 30.04, 29.89, 29.96, 29.65, 28.76, 28.41, 28.38, 29.55, 29.76, 29.75, 29.84,

Hi- I'm new to Gluster, but am trying to get it set up on a new compute cluster we're building. We picked Gluster for one of our cluster file systems (we're also using Lustre for fast scratch space), but the Gluster performance has been so bad that I think maybe we have a configuration problem -- perhaps we're missing a tuning parameter that would help, but I can't find

This is significant because it's a plugin which was from the last stable release containing undefined symbols (in the internal plugins). $ ldd -r tests/old-plugins/x86_64/Linux/v1.18.2/nbdkit-file-plugin.so linux-vdso.so.1 (0x00007ffe86cdd000) libgcc_s.so.1 => /lib64/libgcc_s.so.1 (0x00007f551b3e5000) libc.so.6 => /lib64/libc.so.6 (0x00007f551b21b000) /lib64/ld-linux-x86-64.so.2

I have a zpool which has grown "organically". I had a 60Gb disk, I added a 120, I added a 500, I got a 750 and sliced it and mirrored the other pieces. The 60 and the 120 are internal PATA drives, the 500 and 750 are Maxtor OneTouch USB drives. The original system I created the 60+120+500 pool on was Solaris 10 update 3, patched to use ZFS sometime last fall (November I believe). In

v6->v7: - Remove an atomic operation from the 2-task contending code - Shorten the names of some macros - Make the queue waiter to attempt to steal lock when unfair lock is enabled. - Remove lock holder kick from the PV code and fix a race condition - Run the unfair lock & PV code on overcommitted KVM guests to collect performance data. v5->v6: - Change the optimized

v6->v7: - Remove an atomic operation from the 2-task contending code - Shorten the names of some macros - Make the queue waiter to attempt to steal lock when unfair lock is enabled. - Remove lock holder kick from the PV code and fix a race condition - Run the unfair lock & PV code on overcommitted KVM guests to collect performance data. v5->v6: - Change the optimized

Hi, We did some performance test and found the create/delete files performance of btrfs is very poor. The test is that we create 50000 files and measure the file-create time first, and then delete these 50000 files and measure the file-delete time. (The attached file is the reproduce program) The result is following: (Unit: second) Create file performance BtrFS Ext4 Total times:

This creates libnbdkit.so as discussed in the following thread: https://www.redhat.com/archives/libguestfs/2020-March/thread.html#00203 test-delay-shutdown.sh fails for unclear reasons. This series starts by reverting "tests: Don't strand hung nbdkit processes" which is because several other tests fail randomly unless I revert this patch. I didn't investigate this yet so it

Hi there We have a pair of servers running FreeBSD 9.1-RC3 that act as transparent layer 7 loadbalancer (relayd) and pop/imap proxy (dovecot). Only one of them is active at a given time, it's a failover setup. From time to time the active one gets in a state in which the 'thread taskq' thread uses up 100% of one cpu on its own, like here: ---- PID USERNAME PRI NICE SIZE

Signed-off-by: Scott Seago <sseago at redhat.com> --- AUTHORS | 17 ++++++ README | 10 +++ conf/ovirt-agent | 12 ++++ conf/ovirt-db-omatic | 12 ++++ conf/ovirt-host-browser | 12 ++++