similar to: about partial response and partial residual

Hi again! I have a question about R. I have done gam in previous version of R with "mgcv" package and saved the workspace. This workspace contains different models and I will do prediction by these GAMs. However, I install new version of R. and use the same workspace. when I type summary(models), and the error message showed Error in Predict.matrix.cr.smooth(object, dk$data) : F is

i read a book from WOOD, there's an example which is talking about the pollutant. library(gamair) library(mgcv) y<-gam(death~s(time,bs="cr",k=200)+s(pm10median,bs="cr")+s(so2median,bs="cr")+s(o3median,bs="cr")+s(tmpd,bs="cr"),data=chicago,family=Possion) lag.sum<-function(a,10,11) {n<-length(a) b<-rep(0,n-11) for(i in 0:(11-10))

I'm beginner in R! I have a lot of problems on R..... I have three questions about GAM 1. What is the function of Gaussian distribution in GAM?(if I choose family is Gaussian) Is it used in the predictand value (Y)? 2. How to plot a graph the gam function? For example: y<-gam(a~s(b),family=gaussian (link=log) ,Data) how to plot x axis is s(b) and y axis is log a??? 3. if I use GAM to

Dear list, does anybody know whether there is a way to easily retrieve the so called "partial residuals" of a gam fit with package mgcv? The partial residuals are the residuals you would get if you would "leave out" a particular predictor and are the dots in the plots created by plot(gam.object,residuals=TRUE) residuals.gam() gives me whole model residuals and

Dear R-experts, Here below my R code. I get a NaN response for gam with mgcv library. How to solve that problem? Many thanks. ######################################################### library(mgcv) ? y=c(23,24,34,40,42,43,54,34,52,54,23,32,35,45,46,54,34,36,37,48) x1=c(0.1,0.3,0.5,0.7,0.8,0.9,0.1,0.7,0.67,0.98,0.56,0.54,0.34,0.12,0.47,0.52,0.87,0.56,0.71,0.6)

Hi,everyone, I am studying the generalized additive model and employ the package 'mgcv' developed by professor Wood. However,I can not understand the example listed in check.in function. For example, library(mgcv) set.seed(1) dat <- gamSim(1,n=400,scale=2) ## fit a GAM with quite low `k' b<-gam(y~s(x0,k=6)+s(x1,k=6)+s(x2,k=6)+s(x3,k=6),data=dat) plot(b,pages=1,residuals=TRUE)

Dear all, I've now spent a couple of days trying to learn R and, in particular, the gam() function, and I now have a few questions and reflections regarding the latter. Maybe these things are implemented in some way that I'm not yet aware of or have perhaps been decided by the R community to not be what's wanted. Of course, my lack of complete theoretical understanding of what

The plots look reasonable to me. The plot of residuals against linear predictor always looks scary when many of the fitted values are very close to zero, so I tend to look at residuals against sqrt(fitted) in such cases. I don't think that the presence of the zero curve is a reason to reject the model --- it's easy to produce such plots by fitting a completely correct model to simulated

Dear group, I experience s?ome problems with gam() function after R update to version 2.13.1 The function in both gam and mgcv packages stopped to work. Before, with the same code I used, everything was fine. The function from gam package yields following warning: Residual degrees of freedom are negative or zero. This occurs when the sum of the parametric and nonparametric degrees of freedom

Is there a way to add residuals to plots produced by plot.gam in the mgcv package? I'm looking for something like what you get using resid=T in Splus plot.gam. Thanks in advance Toby -----Original Message----- From: Simon Wood [mailto:snw at mcs.st-and.ac.uk] Sent: 23 January, 2002 8:14 PM To: Toby.Patterson at csiro.au Cc: r-help at stat.math.ethz.ch Subject: Re: [R] multiple surfaces in

Would anyone be able to provide insight for the following question, please? Setting: estimation of prediction intervals for age-period-cohort models using GAMs (rate ~ s(age,period)) Method: bootstrap (Davison and Hinkley, 1997) Issue: standardisation of the residuals for resampling requires an adjustment using the diagonals of the hat matrix. Is there a simple way to get the hat values out of a

Dear package mgcv users, I am using package mgcv to describe presence of a migratory bird species as a function of several variables, including year, day number (i.e. day-of-the-year), duration of survey, latitude and longitude. Thus, the "global model" is: global_model<-gam(present ~ as.factor(year) + s(dayno, k=5) + s(duration, k=5) + s(x, k=5) + s(y, k=5), family =

I have asked this question on Stackoverflow and was told it does not relate to the sites' mission as it is statistical question, thus I brought it here. I am fitting a gam mode in the mgcv package to study associations of environmental pollutants and mortality. The aim is to choose a model with lowest mgcv and also to reduce the PACF to less than < |0.1|. library(gamair) library(mgcv)

Dear users, I am trying to show the equation (including coefficients from the model estimates) for a gam model but do not understand how to. Slide 7 from one of the authors presentations (gam-theory.pdf URL: http://people.bath.ac.uk/sw283/mgcv/) shows a general equation log{E(yi )} = ?+ ?xi + f (zi ) . What I would like to do is put my model coefficients and present the equation used. I am an

Qusetion #1 ********* Model selection in GAM can be done by using: 1. step.gam {gam} : A directional stepwise search 2. gam {mgcv} : Smoothness estimation using GCV or UBRE/AIC criterion Suppose my model starts with a additive model (linear part + spline part). Using gam() {mgcv} i got estimated degrees of freedom(edf) for the smoothing splines. Now I want to use the functional form of my model

Hello, I am trying to update the mgcv package on my Linux box and I keep getting an "Out of memory!" error. Does anyone know of a fix for this? Below is a snippet of the message that I keep getting: Thank you. Geoff ** R ** inst ** preparing package for lazy loading ** help *** installing help indices >>> Building/Updating help pages for package 'mgcv' Formats:

I am trying to compare and contrast the smoothing in the {mgcv} version of gam vs. the {gam} version of gam but I get a strange side effects when I try to alternate calls to these routines, even though I detach and unload namespaces. Specifically when I start up R the following code runs successfully until the last line i.e. plot(g4,se=TRUE) when I get "Error in dim(data) <- dim :

Dear Simon, Thank you for your quick reply! I used to perform the GAMsetup in the following manner: GAMsetup sintax: x.summer: vector used for construct the spline knots<-14 N<-length(x.summer) x<-array(x.summer,dim=c(1,N)) G<-list(m=1,n=N,nsdf=0,df=knots+1,dim=1,s.type=0,by=0,by.exists=FALSE,p.order=0,x=x,n.knots=knots,fit.method="mgcv") H<-GAMsetup(G) with the

Dear all, I run the GAMs (generalized additive models) in gam(mgcv) using the following codes. m.gam <-gam(mark~s(x)+s(y)+s(lstday2004)+s(ndvi2004)+s(slope)+s(elevation)+disbinary,family=binomial(logit),data=point) And two repeated warnings appeared. Warnings$B!'(B 1: In gam.fit(G, family = G$family, control = control, gamma = gamma, ... : Algorithm did not converge 2: In gam.fit(G,

Readers, I have been reading 'the r book' by Crawley and think that the generalised additive model is appropriate for this problem. The package 'gam' was installed using the command (as root) install.package("gam") ... library(gam) > library(gam) Loading required package: splines Loading required package: akima > library(mgcv) This is mgcv 1.3-25 Attaching