similar to: CentOS "upgrade" from fedora core ?

I'm trying to get zaptel 1.0.2 compiled on FC2 or FC3 and I'm getting compile time errors. Systems include: FC2: Linux xxxxxxxxxxxx 2.6.9-1.3_FC2 #1 Mon Nov 15 14:46:43 EST 2004 i686 i686 i386 GNU/Linux FC3: Linux xxxxxxxxxxxx 2.6.9-1.681_FC3 #1 Thu Nov 18 15:13:22 EST 2004 x86_64 x86_64 x86_64 GNU/Linux /usr/home/bwright/zaptel-1.0.2> make linux26 ... make -C /usr/src/linux-2.6

The RPM for Fedora Core 2 seems to work just fine on Core 3. (The graphics window got smaller, but I'm sure there is a setting for that.) Jon -- Jonathan Baron, Professor of Psychology, University of Pennsylvania Home page: http://www.sas.upenn.edu/~baron R search page: http://finzi.psych.upenn.edu/

The RPM for Fedora Core 2 seems to work just fine on Core 3. (The graphics window got smaller, but I'm sure there is a setting for that.) Jon -- Jonathan Baron, Professor of Psychology, University of Pennsylvania Home page: http://www.sas.upenn.edu/~baron R search page: http://finzi.psych.upenn.edu/

I am setting up Samba between a Windows XP and Fedora Core 2 machine but the FC2 machine is not showing in network neighborhood although I have run the commands below on the FC2 box with no errors. The FC2 box is leitrim and the XP machine is kevinden. [root@leitrim root]# smbclient -L leitrim Password: Domain=[WORKGROUP] OS=[Unix] Server=[Samba 3.0.7-2.FC2] Sharename Type Comment ---------

I update my linux version of FC1 for FC2. FC2 uses tcl-8.4.5 and R-1.9.0 (rpm version for FC1, not install/not run). We have the rpm binary version at FC2? -- Eng. Juan Santiago Ramseyer Email: juan_sr@uol.com.br Fones: 71-341.6473 71-8806.6473

From: Johnny Hughes <mailing-lists at hughesjr.com> > This is not really true. We will probably never have everything that FC > has as added features ... but CentOS-4 has several added features and we > have been out for only a 3 months (so, not required to wait a year). Oh, sorry, I should have clarified. What I meant by "wait a year" was the time from the first .0 or

I'm running Wine 0.9.2 on FC2, I was under the impression that this was the latest stable version, but I did some looking around and found that it's simply the latest version with official RPMs from the wine project. Is there a reason the RH/FC packages have not been updated in over half a year? Is there just a new place where I should be getting them from?

I'm a bit befuddled by this behavior. I've been using dovecot for close to a year, and recently the Fedora Core 2 Update: dovecot-0.99.13-4.FC2 build came in via yum. Since then I occasionally get this EXPUNGE disconnect error. When the error hits, the box does not crash but I can no longer log in*, nor start any new processes. I happen to have gkrellm running and I see a slow but steady

Hi all, A bug popped up recently when I upgraded to fedora core 2 (from core 1). Whenever I used the bitmap() function, ghostscript complained that it couldn't handle png or tiff devices. This was NOT a bug with R. It was with the version of ghostscript shipped with core 2. Going to rawhide and getting ghostscript 7.07-29 (core 2 comes with 7.07-25) solved this problem. Unfortunately, I

Hey folks - So what happened to the RescueCD ISO?... i'm not finding it under the ...centos/4.4/isos/ dir, as i believe it generally has been previously. At my office, we have a local mirror, and i've always just burned the RescueCD ISO and booted with that. At the prompt i supply "linux askmethod" and then later reference our local mirror to do an install or upgrade. The

I have a compilation problem on FC2, 2xXeon box. The following dialogue output from the end of the compilation illustrates: [very large snipping sound ...] * DONE (cluster) begin installing recommended package foreign make[2]: *** [foreign.ts] Error 1 make[2]: Leaving directory `/usr/src/redhat/SOURCES/R-2.0.1/src/library/Recommended' make[1]: *** [recommended-packages] Error 2 make[1]:

Hi All, I decided to have a go at installing Asterisk on FC2 which now runs on Kernel 2.6.. Unfortunately I didn't get very far.. When trying to build zaptel it required me to link /usr/scr/linux-2.6 to the default source dir which is /usr/src/linux-2.6.5-1.358.. I guess thats still the RH infulence.. :) After than I tried again but the page rolls with errors and finally ends with..

I just installed CentRC1 on a Dell gx150 as a test. I'm running into the same problem I had with Fc3. I get a partition table error when trying to use ghost8 to create an image. I was considering putting Cent4 on a ProliantDL380, FC3 installed on that machine but wouldn't boot up, stuck on Grub. I had FC2 on the Proliant but when FC2 went to the 2.6 kernel, it hung up on the Nash prompt.

From: Les Mikesell <lesmikesell at gmail.com> > Yes, but... whose choice was it to ship 2.6 with lots of broken > and omitted stuff when 2.4 works better for many things? Again, 2-2-2, 6-6-6 At some point, Red Hat has to start the new series for "early adopters." That means being the first to adopt the new GLibC, GCC, kernel, etc... Looking at just the GLibC 2+ generations

I was pointed to: http://web.vcs.u52.k12.me.us/linux/smbldap/ As an effective script to get samba/ldap configured for a PDC. It is written for Fedora 3 core or the K12LTSP distro. of course I discovered this after installing the Centos distro. Now it is decision time: stay with Centos and get this working or move the the K12 distro. This setup is for the small business network in my basement

After the aging harddrive in my Redhat 7.2 server died, I decided it was time to upgrade. I bought a new harddrive and did a fresh install of Fedora Core 2. I've managed to get www, ssh and sendmail reconfigured, but I'm having a heck of a time with imap. I first fooled around with cyrus-imapd, and couldn't make head or tail of it, so I downloaded a fedore core 1 imapd rpm and

Followed the "instructions" on voip-info.org regardinging fedora FC2, making Zaptel seems to work fine, however when I modprobe I get this. It looks like a version mismatch somehow. Ideas? If this ooc, sorry first post here :-) modprobe tor2 WARNING: Error inserting zaptel (/lib/modules/2.6.5-1.358smp/misc/zaptel.ko): Invalid module format WARNING: Error inserting zaptel

I am wondering if anyone has a working install of oh323 on fedora Core2. An replies would be appreciated as we need this urgently. Seshu Kanuri -----Original Message----- From: asterisk-users-admin@lists.digium.com [mailto:asterisk-users-admin@lists.digium.com]On Behalf Of steve@nexusuk.org Sent: Thursday, July 22, 2004 6:12 AM To: asterisk-users@lists.digium.com Subject: Re: [Asterisk-Users]

Even I've left this thread. I guess we're all waiting for Lee to turn Blue. ;-> Or is it Red (Hat)? ;-> Okay Lee, we all agree, Red Hat makes stupid decisions, adopts buggy software - especially the kernel and Red Hat is to blame for the decisions in the kernel, and also stupidly backports fixes instead of adopting newer versions with the fixes. And there is absolutely no need for

I followed the Wiki instructions to get zaptel to work on Fedora core 2. It looked like everything went perfect including the loading of ztdummy. However, I am having meetme and MOH problems synonymous with ztdummy not loading. Take a look at my lsmod...Any ideas? (I am running stable Asterisk on a DL360 - Dual processor) Module Size Used by snd_pcm_oss 46201 0