similar to: Conveting SAS Proc mixed to R code

Hello all, First I have done extensive searches on this forum and others and nothing seems to work. So I decided to post thinking someone could point me to the write post or give me some help. I have drawn a 100 samples from a fictitious population (N=1000), and then randomly selected 25% of the 100 samples. I would like to now merge the data.frame from the 100 samples with the data.frame for

Am 13.08.2015 um 07:33 schrieb ?????? ????? ??????????????: > 11/08/15 13:35, J. Echter ?????: >> Hi, >> >> i'd like to convert from maildir to mdbox. >> >> what would be the best way to do this? >> >> i have read the dsync part of the dovecot wiki but i don't get what i >> have to use for my setup. > > Sometime, when I must

Hi: I am trying to convert an avi file to an ogg file. The avi file is 12 frames /sec, resolution 1280x768, 24bits, compression: Cinepak Codec. I got the following message. D:\Dragon\Tools\Theora>ffmpeg2theora-0.16.exe -V 16000 Astro.avi Input #0, avi, from 'Astro.avi': Duration: 00:00:04.0, start: 0.000000, bitrate: 19604 kb/s Stream #0.0, 12.00 fps(r): Video: cinepak, yuv420p,

14/08/15 23:33, J. Echter ?????: >> > Hi, > > thanks for your reply. > > Would be nice to have a look at this script :) > > Thanks for your offer. > > Juergen > http://www.sheltonsoft.ru/fileZ/other/convmbx.tar.bz2 When you converting maildir-based mail boxes, you must grant write access to anyone to root mailbox folder, elsewhere conveting failed (dsync

Hi, Few days ago I installed Email2fax application on my Asterisk box. I works but not in 100 %. Sometimes (to be certain quite often) I don't receive the whole fax. My fax machine cuts off transmission in 1/2 or 1/3 of the page. I read about it on a wiki and some user lists and people say that this behaviour could be cause be the Ghostscript and the conversion to the tiff format, but when I

To anyone that may be able to help, First I applogize if this message ends up in your inbox twice. The first one seemed to get stuck in a pending status so I deleted and started over. I am relatively new to R, however I know the basics through some classes I have taken. Unfortunately the classes left off the more complicated analysis that I need to learn and use. I am attempting to replicate

I am trying to understand why R is working in a particular way. I have a data set with two variables; mark date (markd) and recap date (recapd). I would like to know the number of days between capture dates. But if I subtract recap date from mark date I often get the wrong results. Example: Dataset - markd recapd

Here's an easy one for y'all. I am running samba V1.9.16p1 on an NT 4.0 vs. Solrais 2.51 peer to peer, and so far so good. !BUT! I am about to go to Solaris 2.6. Is there anything different that must be done for samba on this newer Solaris version? thanks- john "...you can't stop progress, but you can help redefine it." -anonymous "angels hang their socks on

Dear all, I try to compare the performances of several parameters to diagnose lameness in dogs. I have several ROC curves from the same dataset. I plotted the ROC curves and calculated AUC with the ROCR package. I would like to compare the AUC. I used the following program I found on R-help archives : From: Bernardo Rangel Tura Date: Thu 16 Dec 2004 - 07:30:37 EST

On Tuesday 05 August 2008 12:39, Dan Gohman wrote: > On Tue, August 5, 2008 8:32 am, David Greene wrote: > > On Monday 04 August 2008 17:56, Dan Gohman wrote: > >> The applymask approach leverages use-def information rather than > >> what can be thought of as duplicating a subset of it, making the IR > > > > I don't understand what you mean by

On Tuesday 05 August 2008 13:27, David Greene wrote: > Neither solution eliminates the need for instcombine to be careful and > consult masks from time to time. > > Perhaps I'm totally missing something. Concrete examples would be helpful. Ok, so I took my own advice and thought about CSE and instcombine a bit. I wrote the code by hand in a sort of pseudo-llvm language, so

On Tue, August 5, 2008 8:32 am, David Greene wrote: > On Monday 04 August 2008 17:56, Dan Gohman wrote: >> The applymask approach leverages use-def information rather than >> what can be thought of as duplicating a subset of it, making the IR > > I don't understand what you mean by "duplicating" here. If you look just at the case where every instruction in a

On Wed, 7 Nov 2007, Nicolas Geoffray wrote: > Thanks BGB, but at this point I can handle it ;-). The problem is not > how in theory (patch the caller), but how in the LLVM code generation > process. There are three steps for that: > > 1) How to represent the stub in the IR? An intrinsic? An external field > with a ghost linkage? Probably an intrinsic. The trick is making it

> The x86-64 one probably doesn't work for Winodws. That's likely the > issue. Well, x86-64 stub was never ported to intel assembler, I expect to see 32-bit one used on windows64. In general, the whole windows64 support is missed mainly due to crazy calling convetion invented by Microsoft. So, all calls from code being JITed to external functions will be clearly broken (if they

On Mon, 14 Apr 2008, Jon Sargeant wrote: > Ugh, this isn't what I wanted to hear. Passing "complex" differently > than a structure containing two doubles is a bad design, but alas, > calling conventions are beyond our control. How many special cases like > this are there? If "complex" is the only special case, LLVM could There are a huge number of special

> > entirely in the back end. Apart from calling conventions, the front end > > doesn't need to know the specific target, only the data layout and which > > intrinsics the target supports. This approach makes a clean division > > between the front end and back end. > > If you want to map from a C type/calling convetion to LLVM IR, clang is a > good way to

The attached patch adds documentation of tail call optimization to LangRef.html below Calling Convetions - fastcc. Should i apply it? regards arnold

BGB wrote: > > for x86: > I presume LLVM supports inline assembler, and also uses the traditional > frame pointer-based stack layout, but I don't know the details (people who > know LLVM could probably be more helpful here). > > ok, maybe here is an option: > after getting the value (in the created stub), execute a chunk of inline > assembler to modify the caller

Duncan Sands wrote: > Hi Jon, > >> What is the correct procedure for translating a function signature from >> a high-order language to LLVM? > > you have to do it carefully so that LLVM will end up producing object code > that conforms to the platform ABI. For example, suppose you are using cdecl > with a small struct (a pair of ints, say). Then your function

I have a feature request for rsync. I tried posting it to the FAQ-o-matic, but that system didn't seem to be accepting new questions. I hope this is an okay list for the request--apologies if it's misdirected. Mac OS X provides support for the Mac file system resource forks and mac specific metadata (e.g., creator and file type). Most Unix applications ignore this information, but it