similar to: R Help Question on cor() function

Just did some testing.. root at vicky:~# cat /var/log/auth.log | grep "Set" May 30 21:41:05 vicky sshd[1568]: Set /proc/self/oom_adj from -17 to -17 May 30 21:41:07 vicky sshd[1574]: Set /proc/self/oom_adj to -17 root at vicky:~# ps faux | grep 1574 root 1574 0.0 0.0 70488 3404 ? Ss 21:41 0:00 \_ sshd: root at pts/1 root at vicky:~# ps faux | grep

hi, i am not hitting an error when i copy and paste your code into a fresh console. maybe compare your sessionInfo() to mine? > sessionInfo() R version 3.4.1 (2017-06-30) Platform: x86_64-w64-mingw32/x64 (64-bit) Running under: Windows Server 2008 R2 x64 (build 7601) Service Pack 1 Matrix products: default locale: [1] LC_COLLATE=English_United States.1252

Greetings, I am revisiting code from several different files I have saved from the past and all used to run flawlessly; now when I run any of the svyglm related functions, I am coming up with an error: Error in model.frame.default(formula = F3ATTAINB ~ F1PARED, data = data, : the ... list does not contain 4 elements The following is a minimal reproducible example: library(RCurl)

To Whom it May Concern: I have been using R version 2.6.2 for awhile now, installed on a PowerMac G5 running OS 10.4.11 I typically get Quartz graphics output from R into Adobe Illustrator CS2 simply by copying and pasting. Upon upgrading to R version 2.7.0, I now receive an error from Illustrator when trying to paste R generated graphics from the Quartz window into Illustrator. I do

Under FreeBSD 5.3, attempting to properly install R-2.1.1, I get the following response when I..... % make ;all finishes without error, then... % make check <ret> . . ---------------------------------------------- comparing d-p-q-r-tests.Rout to d-p-q-r-tests.Rout.save 1004c1004 < [1] mean relative difference 1.2848649e-08 [1] TRUE .....Error code 1 stop in ~R/R-2.1.1/tests

OK, i've got asterisk @ home 1.3 up and running with Broadvoice. BUT I have one nagging problem to sort out. When you call my BV # the calling party gets no ring indication, just silence until either I answer the phone, or the call bounces over to voicemail. below is the console output when a call is recieved. what am i missing here? thanks Bernie -- Executing

Pardon my ignorance, but is there a difference in cor.test between exact=FALSE and exact=NULL when method=spearman? Take for example: x<-c(1,2,2,3,4,5) y<-c(1,2,2,10,11,12) cor.test(x,y, method="spearman", exact=NULL) This gives an error message, Warning message: Cannot compute exact p-values with ties in: cor.test.default(x, y, method = "spearman", exact = NULL)

Hello, Does anyone know if the cor function, when method = "spearman", returns a correlation coefficient corrected for any ties in the ranks of the data? I have data with quite a few ties and am thinking that I should use a calculation of the coefficient corrected for ties, but before I try and code this calculation myself, I thought I should check whether or not cor() automatically

Hi, all. Yet another beginner to R : ) I wonder, how it's possible to get the value of a coefficient from the object produced by cor.test() ? > cor.test(a, b, method="spearman") Spearman's rank correlation rho data: a and b S = 21554.28, p-value = 2.496e-11 alternative hypothesis: true rho is not equal to 0 sample estimates: rho 0.6807955 Warning message: In

Apologies for the noop question in advance (just getting started with LLVM), and I'm not entirely sure if this is the right list to post to. is it? I have some lambda functions as member variables that I want to have my LLVM language make calls to. I've added a mapping to them, but this doesn't seem to enable LLVM to resolve the functions. I asked on stackoverflow but the suggestion

I would like to turn off the warnings from cor.test while retaining exact=NULL. Is that possible ? > cor.test(c(1,2,3,3,4,5), c(1,2,3,3,4,5), method = "spearman") Spearman's rank correlation rho data: c(1, 2, 3, 3, 4, 5) and c(1, 2, 3, 3, 4, 5) S = 0, p-value < 2.2e-16 alternative hypothesis: true rho is not equal to 0 sample estimates: rho 1 Warning message: In

Full_Name: David Simcha Version: 2.10 OS: Windows XP Home Submission from: (NULL) (173.3.208.5) > a <- c(1:10) > b <- c(1:10) > cor.test(a, b, method = "spearman", alternative = "greater", exact = TRUE) Spearman's rank correlation rho data: a and b S = 0, p-value < 2.2e-16 alternative hypothesis: true rho is greater than 0 sample estimates:

Hi, I have the following two measurements stored in mat: > print(mat) [,1] [,2] [1,] -14.80976 -265.786 [2,] -14.92417 -54.724 [3,] -13.92087 -58.912 [4,] -9.11503 -115.580 [5,] -17.05970 -278.749 [6,] -25.23313 -219.513 [7,] -19.62465 -497.873 [8,] -13.92087 -659.486 [9,] -14.24629 -131.680 [10,] -20.81758 -604.961 [11,] -15.32194 -18.735 To calculate the ranking

Hi see in line > -----Original Message----- > From: R-help [mailto:r-help-bounces at r-project.org] On Behalf Of Courtney > Benjamin > Sent: Thursday, August 10, 2017 5:55 AM > To: r-help at r-project.org > Subject: [R] Creating New Variable Using Ifelse > > Hello R Help List, > > I am an R novice and trying to use the ifelse function to create a new binary >

Dear HelpeRs, I have some data: "ice" <- structure(c(0.386, 0.374, 0.393, 0.425, 0.406, 0.344, 0.327, 0.288, 0.269, 0.256, 0.286, 0.298, 0.329, 0.318, 0.381, 0.381, 0.47, 0.443, 0.386, 0.342, 0.319, 0.307, 0.284, 0.326, 0.309, 0.359, 0.376, 0.416, 0.437, 0.548, 41, 56, 63, 68, 69, 65, 61, 47, 32, 24, 28, 26, 32, 40, 55, 63, 72, 72, 67, 60, 44, 40, 32, 27, 28, 33,

Hi all, After an electric breaking, my server (Centos 5.2 x86_64 with all updates) can not boot. The error message on screen is: ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Memory for crash kernel (0x0 to 0x0) notwithin permissible range <0> HARDWARE ERROR CPU 1: Machine Check Exception: 7 Bank 4: .... RIP 10:<.....>

Hi R specialists, When testing the association between two time series the cor.test gives the following message...-> p-values may be incorrect due to tie What does it mean? (it is not described in the help) Thankx, Jan > cor.test(Origi[,1],Origi[,2], alternative = c("two.sided"),method = c("spearman"), conf.level = 0.95) Spearman's rank correlation rho

Greetings. There seems to be a problem with the P-value computation in the cor.test with method="spearman". In R1.8.0 (MS Windows) I seem to be getting intermittently nonsense P-values, but the rho's are OK. I can get this reproducibly with the toy example attached where the first use is OK and subsequent calls with the same data give nonsense. (I have also seen the problem

Hi, I am not sure which kind of test is applied to the data if you use cor.test(x, y) ? Is it an unpaired t-Test? Regards -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/cor.test%28x%2Cy%29-tp22492993p22492993.html Sent from the R help mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

On 01/30/2017 04:17 PM, Adi Pircalabu wrote: > On 28/01/17 05:21, Kevin Stange wrote: >> On 01/27/2017 06:08 AM, Karel Hendrych wrote: >>> Have you tried to eliminate all power management features all over? >> >> I've been trying to find and disable all power management features but >> having relatively little luck with that solving the problems. Stabbing