similar to: Rmark and scientific notation issue

Hi all, I have just started using RMark to analyse capture-recapture data. I am trying to analyse a simulated data set using the Robust Design (two primary periods with three secondary sessions in each) to estimate apparent survival. On specifying the time intervals (that tell R about the primary and secondary sampling sessions), this is the error I get: > time.int <- c(0,0,1,0,0) >

I am trying to load a package called Rmark, but when I run library(Rmark) I get the following: > library(RMark) Error in !character.only : invalid argument type Error in library(RMark) : .First.lib failed for 'RMark' When I try to load Rmark from the packages menu, I get: > local({pkg <- select.list(sort(.packages(all.available = TRUE))) + if(nchar(pkg)) library(pkg,

If I knew this, I have forgotten it: Is there a way to force R to forgo use of scientific notation, e.g. to use .000029 instead of 2.9e-05? (Aside from using formatC for example) I run across this every now and then and work around it (multiple values by 100, for example) but cannot find any way to deal with it otherwise. A particularly problematic place it pops up is in axis tick labels.

Hello, Firstly, real new to R here. I have a function intended to evaluate the values in columns spread over many tables. I have an argument in the function that allows the user to input what sequence of tables they want to draw data from. The function seems to work fine, but when the user inputs a single number (over 9) instead of a sequence using the : operator, I find an error message: the

Hi I am using xyplot() to plot on the log scale by using scale=list(log=T) argument. For example: xyplot(1:10~1:10, scales=list(log=T)) But the axis labels are printed as scientific notation (10^0.0, etc), instead of fixed notation. How can I change that to fixed notation? options(scipen=4) doesn't work on xyplot() Thanks John

Is there a better alternative to x = c(1e7, 2e7) x.lb = c(0,1e7,2e7) s.lb = format(x.lb, scientific = FALSE, big.mark = ",") barplot(x, yaxt = "n", ylab = "") axis(side = 2, at = x.lb, labels = s.lb) (I am sure there is a better alternative to line 2 :)). Thank you. -- View this message in context:

Hello, llvm-bcanalyzer told me that the size of the BLOCKINFO_BLOCK of my file is "1.345017e+01" percent of the whole file. This is not very readable. The attached patch prints the percentage without scientific notation so we get something bit more readable: Block ID #0 (BLOCKINFO_BLOCK): Num Instances: 1 Total Size: 637b/79.62B/19W % of file: 13.450169 Num

Hi, Andreas Neustifter <astifter-llvm at gmx.at> writes: > Maybe you can use the already available "include/llvm/Support/Format.h"? Thanks, that simplifies the patch a lot. See the attached patch. Btw, llvm-bcanalyzer.cpp seems to also use fprintf -- does mixing it with errs() cause problems and should it be converted to use format()? best regards, Timo Lindfors

On Sep 29, 2009, at 9:44 AM, Timo Juhani Lindfors wrote: > Hi, > > Andreas Neustifter <astifter-llvm at gmx.at> writes: >> Maybe you can use the already available "include/llvm/Support/ >> Format.h"? > > Thanks, that simplifies the patch a lot. See the attached patch. It looks like something similar got applied back in r82772 on 9/25. > > Btw,

PROBLEM `signif' does change to scientic notation at different levels depending on the number of significant digits in the input. This can generate tables where figures change ``irregularly'' from normal to scientific notation. PROPOSAL The change to the scientific notation should be made only if the figure in scientific notation - with potentially as

murdoch at stats.uwo.ca wrote: > On 02/02/2010 6:20 AM, Dimitri Shvorob wrote: >> Ruben Roa has kindly suggested using 'scipen' option - cf. >> >>> fixed notation will be preferred unless it is more than =C3=A2=E2=82=AC= =CB=9Cscipen=C3=A2=E2=82=AC=E2=84=A2 digits >>> wider. >> However,=20 >> >> options(scipen =3D 50) >> x =3D

L.S. Is the following expected and/or documented? > 1e-2 < "0.05" [1] TRUE > 1e-4 < "0.05" [1] FALSE Many thanks in advance for any pointer. Best, Tobias > sessionInfo() R Under development (unstable) (2013-01-01 r61512) Platform: i386-w64-mingw32/i386 (32-bit) locale: [1] LC_COLLATE=English_United States.1252 [2] LC_CTYPE=English_United States.1252 [3]

> On 22 Mar 2019, at 18:07 , Martin Maechler <maechler at stat.math.ethz.ch> wrote: > > gives (on Linux R 3.5.3, Fedora 28) > > d=10 d=7 d=2 d=1 d=0 > [1,] "123456" "123456" "123456" "1e+05" "%#4.0-1e" > [2,] "12345.6" "12345.6" "12346"

Hi, Would there be a function and/or some options to force R to write a value of say 1.0e-4 as "0.0001"? More specifically I want to use R to write ASCII file(s) for other programs to read and some of these programs don't know how to deal numbers in scientific notation or have a different convention. Thanks in advance. Yves Gauvreau B.E.F.P. Universit? du Qu?bec ? Montr?al cyg at

Hi, I was working on a project for my class and I am trying to make sure the y-axis numbers NEVER convert automatically to scientific notation. Is there anything I can set in the plot function to make sure of this? I know formatC( ) can be used in the axis function, but it seems to give me an error when using it in the plot function. Thanks, student-in-need-of-some-help

Hi I have a data.frame with the following numbers (first column are month numbers) 07,0,0,0,0.315444056314174,0,0,0,12.5827462764176,0.079194498691732, 0.0280828101707015,0,0.0695808222378877 08,0,0,105600,0.393061160316545,0,0,0,8.95551253153947,0.0880023174276553, 0.285714285714286,0,0.0669139911789158 09,0,0,0,0,12.5,0,0,13.5135887094281,0.0557531529154668,0,0, 0.0487526139182026

Sorry for asking such a simple question, but I couldn't find the answer through a search... How can I get R to show me the values of estimates *not* in scientific notation? When I use summary() after using lm() I am getting numbers like 4.485107e-01, when what I want to see is 0.4485.... Thanks, Brian

note: this e-mail is supposed to precede my coerce hack one. As an example of the other posters mentioning colClasses, with some debugging notes: # create a pretend file for this example > Lines <- scan(sep="\n", what="") a 1 3e-8 b 2 1e+10 c 3 e-10 d 4 e+3 > file <- textConnection(Lines) # import as you would a file, and specify the column types. > T

Hi, Sorry I have to bother you a question. I have a file with each line like this: 6.5500000000000000e+004 2.8235000000000001e+000 3.2000000000000000e+001 1.1580000000000000e+003 2.4400000000000000e+002 5.9800000000000000e+002 2.2700000000000000e+002 3.9030000000000001e+001 -1.2137000000000000e+002 However, I use read.table, it cannot read it correctly. It read in 18 variables instead of

The labels on the x-axis are defaulting to scientific notation no matter how small cex.axis is. How can I override scientific notation to get the labels to print out as specified? Here is the code (UNIT here is 0.0105): plot(xm,yv,log="xy",ylim=c(0.1,20)/UNIT,xlim=c(0.004,20)*UNIT,xaxt="n",t ype="n") axis(1,