similar to: Build a shared disk, shared cpu, shared ram....supercomputing for expanding websites

Dear, "Xenoppix-x86-64(Xen3.0.2+KNOPPIX-x86_64-5.0.1) CD size" is released. http://unit.aist.go.jp/itri/knoppix/xen/index-en.html Xenoppix-x86-64 exploits latest CPU (Intel Core2 Duo and AMD Athlon64). * Xenoppix-x86-64 boots both X86 and X86_64 linux kernel on HVM of Xen. * Xenoppix-x86-64 looks like KNOPPIX but all packages are replaced for X86_64. * Xenoppix-x86-64 also

Forgive me if I sent this twice, I think I hit the "send" button by mistake. --- Bj�rn Tore Svinningen <bt@erter.org> wrote: > I''ve seen your post on xen''s forum about running Xen ontop of openssi. > > Have you got''en any further on this idea ? Had the same idea myselves, > but it seems all posts I find end nowhere. Hm, I thought this

Any thoughts on running Xen on OpenSSI? We have an app we''d like to cluster but is expressly and completely incompatible with the OSes that OpenSSI are supported on, but if we can run several Xen domains on a cluster we can run those OSes and, naturally, that app. Thoughts? CD _______________________________________________ Xen-users mailing list Xen-users@lists.xensource.com

All, What is the state of SSI (single system image) on CentOS 6/7 these days? I'm interested in this at present just for the fun aspect of trying it. Obviously openMosix is no more, but OpenSSI, Kerrighed and LinuxPMI appear to be dormant. TIA, Steve

It's generally said that OM needs lots more swap than plain Linux. There has to be someplace to juggle processes around. We use 4 GB nodes with something like 12 GB swap; that plus round-robin logins to distribute home nodes seemed to solve a lot of our problems. To use oMFS to allow processes to write from the node they've migrated to you also need DFSA enabled. That sounds like a great

Memory could be an issue. The three nodes in the cluster we are using only have 512 MB. The machines are otherwise identical in terms of hardware. They are dual PIIIs (purchased from Penguin Computing in 2001). (If you need specs on motherboard etc, we can get that info together.) The installed operating system is RHEL-3, standard workstation with some additional libraries (e.g., all of the

Hi there, We're currently attempting to explain a slowdown of an LVQ-type parallel analysis we're working on. We are benchmarking our analysis running over openMosix against the same running via SNOW for R. Both perform similarly on small datasets, but on large datasets SNOW drastically outperforms openMosix. However, these results are achieve running SNOW on the default RedHat

Hi there, We're attempting to run an LVQ analysis over a cluster of machines via R and openMosix. R spawns several child processes simply by writing commands to several files and using system() to start a slave process. The processes migrate perfectly, and often finish with no reported errors, writing their results into respective files for the parent process to piece together.

Apologies if this is the wrong place to post this question. In that event, please point me in the right direction. My question is whether or not I can use Xen with OpenMosix. The upshot of what I''m attempting to do is this: 1. Build a two to four node cluster using OpenMosix for "raw horsepower" 2. Use Xen on the OpenMosix cluster to divide the "raw horsepower" any

[ Reposting this here as this Quantian release contains - all CRAN packages as of December 10, 2005 * except the Windows only ones (BRugs, mimR, rcom, RWinEdt) * and three that would not build (Rlsf, ROracle, rJava) for lack of Java, Oracle or rlsf - all BioC packages for release 1.8 * excecpt RMAGEML (needs Java) - for a total of over 800 R packages - a

[ Reposting this here as this Quantian release contains - all CRAN packages as of December 10, 2005 * except the Windows only ones (BRugs, mimR, rcom, RWinEdt) * and three that would not build (Rlsf, ROracle, rJava) for lack of Java, Oracle or rlsf - all BioC packages for release 1.8 * excecpt RMAGEML (needs Java) - for a total of over 800 R packages - a

[ I hope this is not considered off-topic for the list: A new Quantian release was just announced, and it contains even more R. As before, we have R (now 2.2.1), ESS, Ggobi, Rpy, several BioInfo tools -- but now we also have RSPerl, JGR, rJava and more. A full sync to CRAN and BioC as of Feb 25, 2006 now yields dim(installed.packages())[1] of 877. Feedback welcome, but

[ I hope this is not considered off-topic for the list: A new Quantian release was just announced, and it contains even more R. As before, we have R (now 2.2.1), ESS, Ggobi, Rpy, several BioInfo tools -- but now we also have RSPerl, JGR, rJava and more. A full sync to CRAN and BioC as of Feb 25, 2006 now yields dim(installed.packages())[1] of 877. Feedback welcome, but

Hi all, I was hoping to get some advice about a problem that I realize will be difficult to reproduce for some people. I'm running R 1.7.1 on an openMosix (Linux) cluster and have been experiencing some odd slow-downs. If anyone has experience with such a setup (or a similar one) I'd appreciate any help. Here's a simplified version of the problem. I'm trying to run the

Dear FLAC User's Mailing List, I'm Miguel A. Mota Jr., Co-Founder and President of the Woodrow Wilson High School Science & Technology Club in Camden, New Jersey USA. With a few small grants from Lucent Technologies/Bell Labs, we have developed a parallel-processing Linux Cluster (6 nodes) based on Red Hat 7.3 (2.4.18 kernel ) and openMosix clustering technology. Its not much,

[ Apologies for the cross-post, and I hope this is seen as sufficiently on-topic. Anybody who feels otherwise, please drop me a line off-list. ] Earlier this week I sent out the announcement below for the newest version of Quantian. Quantian is a bootable dvd (based off Knoppix & clusterKnoppix) with well over 1gb of scientific, numerical or quantitative software -- and now contains almost

Hey everyone, So I followed the online directions for installing the summagraphics tablet support on a Xen Windows XP guest. However, after rebooting the VNC mouse still is not tracking properly. The XP guest pops up a "Error: tablet device not found" message as well. Has anyone had any success getting the VNC pointer to track properly (I''ve also tried

Hi *, I spent two days to try to solve the following problem without success... (google, archives, ...) Platform: RedHat 9 (OpenSSI cluster) with Samba 3.0.6. The server successfully joined a domain and act as a file server. winbindd runs to map users between the NT & Linux world. wbinfo [-t|-p|-u|-g] -> ok getent passwd -> ok I can successfully see all the Windows users as

I posted the following a little earlier on the quantian-announce list -- but it may be of interest here as well as this version contains all (but three, see below) packages from CRAN, and all of BioConductor. Quantian strives to provide the easiest way to set up a very complete scientific computing environment with a wide variety of tools -- including R, ESS, Ggobi, almost all of CRAN, all of

I posted the following a little earlier on the quantian-announce list -- but it may be of interest here as well as this version contains all (but three, see below) packages from CRAN, and all of BioConductor. Quantian strives to provide the easiest way to set up a very complete scientific computing environment with a wide variety of tools -- including R, ESS, Ggobi, almost all of CRAN, all of