similar to: summary.lm for post-hoc tests

Quick question, as I attempt to learn R. For post-hoc tests 1) Is there an easy function that will take, say the results of tukeyHSD and create a grouping table. e.g., if I have treatments 1, 2, and 3, with 1 and 2 being statistically the same and 3 being different from both Group Treatment A 1 A 2 B 3 2) I've been stumbling over the proper syntax for simple effects for a tukeyHSD

Hello, I am trying to determine the most appropriate way to run post-hoc comparisons on my lme model. I had originally planned to use Tukey HSD method as I am interested in all possible comparisons between my treatment levels. TukeyHSD, however, does not work with lme. The only other code that I was able to find, and which also seems to be widely used, is glht specified with Tukey:

Dear R people, I have a couple of questions about post-doc analyses for 2 by 2 within subjects ANOVA. I conducted a psycholinguistic study that combined a 2 by 2 design and a latin square design. Specifically, I had 32 items each of which generated 4 conditions. Participants saw each of the 32 items only once: 8 in Condition A, 8 in B, 8 in C, and 8 in D. The table below serves as an example.

Hi. This is my first post to this list, I seem to be graduating to from the r-help list. :-) I'm trying to wrap my R package in a GUI such that when the user launches the app, they see my GUI window and never interact with the R console at all. I don't have any fancy requirements for the GUI itself-- all it needs to do is collect input from the user and pass the input as arguments to

Hi R-helpers, TukeyHSD() works for models fitted with aov(), but could anyone point me to a function that performs a similar post hoc test for models fitted with lm() or glm()? Thanks in advance, Mark

In http://tolstoy.newcastle.edu.au/R/e2/help/06/10/3064.html a method was given for converting a frequency table to an expanded data frame representing each observation as a set of factors. A slightly modified version was later included in the NCStats package, only on http://rforge.net/ (and it has too many dependencies to be useful). I've tried to make it more general, allowing an input

Hello R People: Here's the Saturday night goofy question. I would like to see the code for TukeyHSD function and I tried the following: > getAnywhere("TukeyHSD") A single object matching ?TukeyHSD? was found It was found in the following places package:stats namespace:stats with value function (x, which, ordered = FALSE, conf.level = 0.95, ...)

Hi, is there a specific/appropriate function/package to perform post hoc tests when running a two way repeated measures anova? I'm looking for something that will be equivalent to the 'TukeyHSD()' for between subjects anova (with 'aov()'). For one way repeated measures anova, the 'pairwise.t.test()' function seems to work correctly but the results are questionable for

Hello, Despite my search, I didn't find a post-hoc test for an ANCOVA. I used the functions aov() and lm() to run the ANCOVA then I tried TukeyHSD() but it didn't work (because of the covariable is a continuous variable?). Furthermore, I would like to plot the adjusted values (i.e. the values of the tested variable taking into account the covariable). Thanks for your help! N. Poulet

Is there code in R to automatically assign letters to different groups that are found to be statistically significant using a post-hoc test following an ANOVA? For example, let's say I found that relative rates of tree growth were statistically significant between tree species using an ANOVA and then I ran a TukeyHSD post-hoc test to determine which species were statistically

Dear R-helpers, I have an ANCOVA with a significant effect of the factor, which has three levels. I wish to determine which of the levels are different from each other but, because my model was fitted with lm(), I cannot use TukeyHSD. For some reason, I get different results (no significant effect of the factor) when I fit the model using aov() so, for the moment, I am using lm(). Could anyone

Hi, I was trying to figure out how to do post-hoc tests for Two Way ANOVAs and found the following 2 approaches: a. Do pairwise t-tests (bonferroni corrected) if one finds significance with the ANOVA. Link- http://rtutorialseries.blogspot.com/2011/01/r-tutorial-series-two-way-anova-with.html b. Do TukeyHSD on an aov model Link-

Hi, I have searched and found a response to a question similar to mine but when I tried the code, R says it's not an actual function so I thought I'd ask here. http://r.789695.n4.nabble.com/file/n4633035/Cookies.csv Cookies.csv I have attached the data I am using. I am trying to look at two things: how moisture content changes over time, and how it changes along the length of a log

Greetings all, I've done some ANOVAs and have found significant effects across my groups, so now I have to do some post-hoc tests to ascertain which of the groups is driving the significant effect. Usually one would do something like a Newman-Keuls or Scheffe test to get at this but based on googling and browsing through the r-help archives R doesn't support these and they seem to be

Hi everyone, I am fairly new to R, and I am aware that others have had this problem before, but I have failed to solve the problem from previous replies I found in the archives. As this is such a standard procedure in psychological science, there must be an elegant solution to this...I think. I would much appreciate a solution that even I could understand... ;-) Now, I want to calculate a

Hello dear R-help mailing list, A friend of mine teaches a regression and experimental design course and asked me the following question. She is trying to find a way to display the "homogeneous groups" (after performing tukey test on an aov object). here's an example for what she means by "homogeneous groups": She did one way anova and got these results for tukey test:

Hallo, zur Analyse von Daten zum Artenreichtum von Pflanzen, habe ich ein Glm (glm) und anschlie?end eine Anova (anova) durchgef??hrt. Nun m??chte ich f??r die signifikanten Einflussfaktoren einen Post Hoc Tukey Test durchf??hren, um zu ermitteln in wie weit die einzelnen Faktorstufen sich signifikant voneinander unterscheiden. Mit dem Befehl (TukeyHSD) komme ich nicht

Dear R-Helpers, I was calling the TukeyHSD function and not getting confidence intervals or p-values. It turns out this was caused by missing data and the fact that I had previously turned on R Commander (Rcmdr). John Fox knew that Rcmdr sets na.action to na.exclude, which causes the problem. If you have this problem, you can either exit Rcmdr before calling TukeyHSD or you can set na.action to

I can prove I've done this before, but I recently installed Rexcel (and it was easiest to reinstall R and some other bits to make it work) and now its no longer working. Before I would do an ANOVA and a tukey post-hoc like this: >data1.aov=aov(result~factor1*factor2, data=data1) then... >TukeyHSD(summary(data1.aov)) and it would give me a nice tukey table of all the pairwise

Dear R-developeRs, Attached follows a patch against svn 34959 that adds the printing of p-values to the TukeyHSD.aov function in stats package. I also updated the corresponding documentation file and added a 'see also' reference to the simint function of the multcomp package. As it was already brought up in a previous thread [1] in R-help, one can obtain the adjusted