similar to: getting all contrasts from glm

I can not understand why this fails > > faicoutput2 <- list(stuff21 = as.numeric(faicout$coefficients[2]), + stuff31=as.numeric(faicout$coefficients[3]), + stuff41=as.numeric(faicout$coefficients[4]), + stuff32=(stuff21-stuff31), + stuff42=(stuff21-stuff41), +

Is there a better or more efficent approach than this without the use of t() ? > (m <- matrix(1:40, ncol=4)) [,1] [,2] [,3] [,4] [1,] 1 11 21 31 [2,] 2 12 22 32 [3,] 3 13 23 33 [4,] 4 14 24 34 [5,] 5 15 25 35 [6,] 6 16 26 36 [7,] 7 17 27 37 [8,] 8 18 28 38 [9,] 9 19 29 39[10,] 10 20 30 40 >

Hi friends, I have questions about printing a pretty big size matrix. As you could see from below, the matrix wasn't showed in R at full size (11X11), but it was cut partly into three smaller matrices (11X4,11X4,11X3). I'm wondering if there is a way to show the whole matrix with dimension 11X11, do you know how to make it? If R really couldn't fit the full big matrix at once, what

Dear all, I've discovered the possibility to do the Nemenyi-Damico-Wolfe-Dunn test in the library(coin); oneway_test() With the given example I am unfortunately not able to reproduce the test. What does trafo and contrMat mean? I have a dataframe with 176 elements in 7 classes. It may be a problem, that my model isn't balanced? In Class1 I happen to have 4 elements, while there are 90 in

Hi R users: I have de following data frame (called "Sx") Descripcion Nitratos Cont85g 72.40 Cont85g 100.50 Cont85g 138.30 Cont80g 178.33 Cont80g 79.01 Cont80g 74.16 Cont75g 23.70 Cont75g 15.80 Cont75g 16.20 Patron80g

Dear list, As a reply to my recent mail: > simint and TukeyHSD work for aov objects. > Can someone point me to similar functions for lme objects? Douglas Bates wrote There aren't multiple comparison methods for lme objects because it is not clear how to do multiple comparisons for these. I don't think the theory of multiple comparisons extends easily to lme models. One could

I suppose that multcomp in R and multicomp in S-Plus are related and it appears that it is possible to use multicomp with lme in S-Plus given the following correspondence on s-news sally.rodriguez at philips.com 12:57 p.m. 24/04/03 -0400 7 [S] LME summary and multicomp.default() Is it possible to use multicomp with lme in R and if so what is the syntax from a simple readily available

Hello all, I would like to do a Dunnett test in glht(). However, the factor level I want to use as the control is not the first. dunn1<-glht(model3, linfct = mcp(Container = "Dunnett"), alternative = "less") The factor container has 8 levels, so it would be nice not to manually enter in all of the contrasts. I originally discovered glht() when working with a glm model

I have run the following logistic regression model: options(contrasts=c("contr.treatment", "contr.poly")) m <- glm(wolf.cross ~ null.cross + feature, family = "binomial") where: wolf.cross = likelihood of wolves crossing a linear feature null.cross = proportion of random paths that crossed a linear feature feature = CATEGORY of linear feature with 5 levels:

Dear R-help list, I would like to perform multiple comparisons for lme. Can you report to me if my way to is correct or not? Please, note that I am not nor a statistician nor a mathematician, so, some understandings are sometimes quite hard for me. According to the previous helps on the topic in R-help list May 2003 (please, see Torsten Hothorn advices) and books such as Venables &

Hi, the following R lines work fine in R 2.4.0, but not in R 2.4.1 or any devel versions of R 2.5.0 (see below for details). library(drc) # to load the dataset 'PestSci' library(nlme) ## Setting starting values sv <- c(0.43355869, 2.49963220, 0.05861799, 1.73290589, 0.38153146, 0.24316978) ## No error m1 <- nlme(SLOPE ~ c + (d-c)/(1+exp(b*(log(DOSE)-log(e)))), fixed =

Dear fellow R users, Keywords: Kruskal-Wallis, Post-Hoc, pair-wise comparisons, Nemenyi-Damico-Wolfe-Dunn test, coin package, oneway_test I am using the "oneway_test" function in the R package "coin" and I am obtaining results which I cannot believe are accurate. I do not wish to waste anyone's time and so if the following problem is rather trivial, I apologize, however I

This is only partly a question about R, as I am not quite sure about the underlying statistical theory either. I have fitted a non-linear mixed-effects model with nlme. In the fixed part of the model I have a factor with three levels as explanatory variable. I would like to use Tukey HSD or a similar test to test for differences between these three levels. I have two grouping factors:

Hi, I want to export the result of glht in R into a LaTeX table, such as that result: Linear Hypotheses: Estimate Std. Error z value Pr(>|z|) Group1 - Group2 == 0 -0.14007 0.01589 -8.813 <0.001 "***" Group1 - Group3 == 0 -0.09396 0.01575 -5.965 <0.001 *** --- Signif. codes: 0 ?***? 0.001 ?**? 0.01 ?*? 0.05

Hello, I'm a totally newbie to R and I'm taking a class using S+. In the class we use the multcomp command which takes a aov object and calculates confidence intervals for all pairwise differences by the Fisher least significant differences method. How can I do this in R. Thank you for taking the time with such a basic question. I've been looking on the net for a few days and I

Hello everyone I am currently trying to conduct analysis of my graduate thesis data using a mixed effects model and I have reached an impass. When I try to conduct a multiple comparison, I get an error (See below): > fm3<- lme(abovegroundbiomass.m.2~medium*amelioration*fertilizer*treatment, random=~1|block/medium/amelioration/fertilizer) > tukeytest<-glht(fm3,

Hello, the title says it all. I have an ANOVA model with "Error" term and the functions TukeyHSD or those from the "multcomp" package seem not to work with such a model. Assuming that the object returned from aov() function with multiple strata is a list of aov objects, I tried something like TukeyHSD(aov.1$Within), but this does not work either. Does somebody have a

Dear R-group, I am trying desperately to get this Tukey test working. Its my first time here so I hope my question is not too stupid, but I couldn't find anything helpful in the help or in the forum. I am analysing a dataset of treated grasses. I want to find out, if the grasses from different Provenances react differently. In the aov test I found a significance for the combination Treatment

Is it possible to implement the Jonckheere-Terpstra test for ordered alternatives using the coin package: Conditional Inference Procedures in a Permutation Test Framework? I found jonckheere.test{clinfun}, but it uses a normal approximation when ties are present in the data. To make this concrete, I've include a small dataset. Thanks. --Dale Hollander and Wolfe, 1999 Table 6.6, pg 205

Hi, I have a fairly simple repeated measures-type data set I've been attempting to analyze using the lme function in the nlme package. Repeated searches here and other places lead me to believe I have specified my model correctly. However, I am having trouble with post-hoc tests. From what I gather, other people are successfully using the glht function from the multcomp package to