similar to: can't compile R on CentOS 64bit (bad interpreter: Permission denied)

Displaying 20 results from an estimated 10000 matches similar to: "can't compile R on CentOS 64bit (bad interpreter: Permission denied)"

2005 Nov 21
1
./configure: /bin/sh: bad interpreter: Permission denied
I am trying to install R1.8. When I use "make" to build R, it gives me following error, * Installing *source* package 'foreign' ... /usr/local/bin/R-1.8.1/bin/INSTALL: ./configure: /bin/sh: bad interpreter: Permission denied ERROR: configuration failed for package 'foreign' ** Removing '/usr/local/bin/R-1.8.1/library/foreign' make[2]: *** [foreign.ts] Error 1
2009 Jul 25
2
install DVD mounted -noexec by default == bad interpreter permission denied
Installing matlab on Centos5. command I typed: /media/MATHWORKS_R2009A/install & Error message I received: [1] 10759 [root at taro matlab]# bash: /media/MATHWORKS_R2009A/install: /bin/sh: bad interpreter: Permission denied Google found no hits with this precise error message, but several similar hits when I leave out the matlab path. Solution: mount -o remount -o exec /dev/scd0 (scd0 is
2009 Sep 02
1
Installing rJava RJDBC bad interpreter: Permission denied
Trying to install the above two packages via the "install.packages("package_name")" command and the "R CMD INSTALL file.tar.gz". I receive the following error either way "sh: ./configure: /bin/sh: bad interpreter: Permission denied". I have tried to chmod and chown permissions and also ran dos2unix in hopes that there is a CRLF in some of the tar.gz files,
2009 Sep 02
1
Installing rJava RJDBC bad interpreter: Permission denied
Trying to install the above two packages via the "install.packages("package_name")" command and the "R CMD INSTALL file.tar.gz". I receive the following error either way "sh: ./configure: /bin/sh: bad interpreter: Permission denied". I have tried to chmod and chown permissions and also ran dos2unix in hopes that there is a CRLF in some of the tar.gz files,
2009 Aug 26
1
Installing rJava RJDBC bad interpreter: Permission denied
Trying to install the above two packages via the "install.packages("package_name")" command and the "R CMD INSTALL file.tar.gz". I receive the following error either way "sh: ./configure: /bin/sh: bad interpreter: Permission denied". I have tried to chmod and chown permissions and also ran dos2unix in hopes that there is a CRLF in some of the tar.gz files,
2010 Jul 16
1
garbage collection & memory leaks in 'R', it seems...
Hello developers, I noticed that if I am running 'R', type "rm(list=objects())" and "gc()", 'R' will still be consuming (a lot) more memory than when I then close 'R' and re-open it. In my ignorance, I'm presuming this is something in 'R' where it doesn't really do a great job of garbage collection... at least not nearly as well as
2002 May 16
1
Samba [2.2.3a-6] printing: looks like a major security hole?
Hello, We're running Samba 2.2.3a-6 on Debian (Woody). With security level set to "share" we share a local printer and everything works. Now I'm trying to impose access restrictions on that printer: ----------------------------------- [global] security=share printing=cups printcap name=cups ... [myprinter] browseable=no path=/tmp public=no printable=yes writable=no valid
2011 Feb 03
1
bug in codetools/R CMD check?
Hi Mr Tierney, I have noticed an error message from R 1.12.x's CMD check for a while (apparently prof Ripley completely rewrote CMD check in R 1.12+) e.g.: http://bioconductor.org/checkResults/2.7/bioc-LATEST/snpMatrix/lamb2-checksrc.html ---------------- * checking R code for possible problems ... NOTE Warning: non-unique value when setting 'row.names': ?new? Error in
2013 Jan 16
2
Codetools Query (repost)
Sorry for reposting, i keep forgetting this should be plain text. Will not make this mistake again Hello, The following code moo <- function(a=1){ x=1; x=x+y} funs <- new.env() enter <- function(type, v, e, w){ assign(v, TRUE, funs) } library(codetools) collectUsage(moo, enterGlobal = enter) adds + to the environment funs i.e. funs: "=" "{" "+"
2007 Jul 25
1
codetools really optional for R CMD check?
After upgrading to R 2.5.1 on Debian, R CMD check gives * checking Rd cross-references ... WARNING Error in .find.package(package, lib.loc) : there is no package called 'codetools' Execution halted * checking for missing documentation entries ... WARNING etc The NEWS file says (for 2.5.0; I was on 2.4 before the recent upgrade) o New recommended package 'codetools' by Luke
2019 May 07
0
Staged installation fail on some file systems
Thanks for the report.? According to my reading, this use of "mv" is ok and the renameat2() call which the invocation of "mv" leads to is also ok and allowed by POSIX in this context. It could only fail with EEXIST if the target directory (path/pkg) was not empty. So far I've not been able to reproduce but we could fall back to copy like on Windows. Best Tomas On
2010 Nov 03
3
R package BibTex entries: looking for a more general solution
== Summary == * Problem: BibTeX entries extracted from R packages via citation() require too much manual editing to be of general use. * Proposal: Date: fields should be made mandatory in package DESCRIPTION files, perhaps beginning with warnings from R CMD check * Proposal: Package authors should be encouraged to use a (new) Contributors: field in the DESCRIPTION file rather than packing all
2019 May 09
0
Staged installation fail on some file systems
On 5/7/19 6:18 PM, Henrik Bengtsson wrote: > On Tue, May 7, 2019 at 9:05 AM Tomas Kalibera <tomas.kalibera at gmail.com> wrote: >> Thanks for the report. According to my reading, this use of "mv" is ok >> and the renameat2() call which the invocation of "mv" leads to is also >> ok and allowed by POSIX in this context. It could only fail with EEXIST
2003 Jul 28
0
codetools
I've put together a package codetools with some tools for examining R source code. It is available at http://www.stat.uiowa.edu/~luke/R/codetools/codetools.tar.gz It requires a reasonably current version of R-devel. The main user functions are: checkUsage, checkUsageEnv, checkUsagePackage: Examine closure, closures in an environment, closures in a package, and report
2010 Mar 25
3
httpd stopped working under SELinux so I had to turn SELinux off. libxml2.so.2: failed to map segment from shared object: Permission denied
Hi. CentOS 5.4 64-bit with SELinux, happily running for over a year, suddenly httpd fails to start up, getting an error message like: Starting httpd: Syntax error on line X of /etc/httpd/conf.d/php.conf: Cannot load /etc/httpd/modules/libphp5.so into server: libxml2.so.2: failed to map segment from shared object: Permission denied I turned off SELinux and was able to start httpd. But what went
2010 Nov 29
2
Friend's post in moderation queue for a week... why so long, please? And getting "permission denied" trying to mount an SMB share
Hi. A friend of mine (Jim Fancher) is having trouble with his Samba install on CentOS Linux. I suggested he ask on the Samba users mailing list. He joined the list and posted, and got an autoreply saying his message is being held for moderation. That was a week ago (Mon, Nov 22nd). Nothing since. I see other posts coming through since then, so wondering why his message got delayed. It was
2007 Apr 24
2
R 2.5.0 in Debian unstable
I just uploaded R 2.5.0 to Debian's unstable distribution. As Peter's announcement says, it now contains two new packages'rcompgen' and 'codetools'. About two or three weeks ago, I also packaged these, just like other 'recommended' packages as r-cran-rcompgen and r-cran-codetools. However, as "new" packages, they are still in the NEW queue awaiting
2016 Apr 09
2
Note: no visible definition
On 4/9/16 10:54 AM, Dirk Eddelbuettel wrote: > On 9 April 2016 at 10:28, Mick Jordan wrote: > | Can someone explain a message of this form from an rscript execution: > | > | Note: no visible global function definition for 'foo' > | > | > | This happens right at the start of execution. 'foo' is only executed in > | a branch of an 'if' that is not
2019 May 07
2
Staged installation fail on some file systems
On Tue, May 7, 2019 at 9:05 AM Tomas Kalibera <tomas.kalibera at gmail.com> wrote: > > Thanks for the report. According to my reading, this use of "mv" is ok > and the renameat2() call which the invocation of "mv" leads to is also > ok and allowed by POSIX in this context. It could only fail with EEXIST > if the target directory (path/pkg) was not empty.
2009 Mar 06
0
Bug in codetools ?
Hello, Is this a bug in codetools: > codetools::showTree( body( glm) ) ("{" (<- call (match.call)) (if (is.character family) (<- family (get family "function" (parent.frame)))) (if (is.function family) (<- family(family))) (if (is.null ($ family family)) ("{" (print family) (stop "'family' not recognized"))) (if (missing data)