similar to: run R

On Tuesday, 26 June 2001 at 11:02, Denys Sene dos Santos wrote: > > Lame3.88 has no reencoding. > Because this, I used 3.86... but it needs to copy the libs manualy > to the right places Er, what version of ices are you running? ices 0.1.0 will not work with 3.86. Lame 3.88 also builds much better. > Why is the Lame/Ices/Icecast documentation so poor ??? Because

# rm config.cache #./configure ... Darrell Berry wrote: > i get > > checking for lame/lame.h... (cached) no > checking for lame.h... (cached) no > configure: error: Could not find a valid LAME library installation > > any ideas? > -- _____________________________________________________________________ \_ \ Denys Sene dos Santos - sene@cptec.inpe.br o/\_

On Tuesday, 26 June 2001 at 15:51, Darrell Berry wrote: > nope, already done that, any other ideas? > > Denys Sene dos Santos wrote: > > > # rm config.cache > > #./configure ... > > > >Darrell Berry wrote: > > > > > >>i get > >> > >>checking for lame/lame.h... (cached) no > >>checking for lame.h... (cached)

Hello All, I'm a newbie in icecast and I'm trying to put it runnig nice, (please, be patient with my english) I got it running with shout, with a big directory of mp3 in my playlist, but after few seconds of transmission it begins to fail. My mp3 files are all 128 at 44. May be the bandwidth to low?? Other question is how can I set a low stream to dial conections of 56K with

Hi Folks, I'm having the weirdest trouble with liveice. When I start it up with the correct servername, it grinds to a halt with these messages: playlist 0 Initialising Soundcard 16Bit 22050Hz Stereo opening connection to localhost 8000 Attempting to Contact Server connection successful: forking process opening pipe!... writing password Then it waits there. Now, when I tried it with a

Just updated the source and now I get the unreachable error again. The JIT doesn't know how to handle a RAUW on a value it has emitted. UNREACHABLE executed at /home/conrado/engines/llvm/lib/ExecutionEngine/JIT/JITEmitter.cpp:1542! I think that it's not helpful now, but I can post the program, if you want me to. On Sun, Jan 31, 2010 at 2:49 PM, Jeffrey Yasskin <jyasskin at

Great! It just worked. I was a bit worried about using pointers to call functions because it's a little too overwhelming in a big project, I think. Just for the record, if the function code isn't freed with freeMachineCodeForFunction, I get a segmentation fault during recompileAndRelinkFunction with this stack dump: Running pass 'X86 Machine Code Emitter' on function

On Sun, Jan 31, 2010 at 7:35 AM, Conrado Miranda <miranda.conrado at gmail.com> wrote: > Great! It just worked. I was a bit worried about using pointers to call > functions because it's a little too overwhelming in a big project, I think. > > Just for the record, if the function code isn't freed with > freeMachineCodeForFunction, I get a segmentation fault during >

On Sat, Jan 30, 2010 at 6:22 PM, Conrado Miranda <miranda.conrado at gmail.com> wrote: > Albert Graef wrote: >> >> The way I do this in Pure is to always call global functions in an >> indirect fashion, using an internal global variable which holds the >> current function pointer. When a function definition gets updated, the >> Pure interpreter just jits the

Hi there. I was trying to rebuild LLVM, this time with Clang, and after getting the last svn version, I got this error during cmake: CMake Error: Error in cmake code at <dir>/llvm/projects/CMakeLists.txt:7: Parse error. Function missing ending ")". Instead found left paren with text "(". The line is "if(NOT (${entry} STREQUAL

Albert Graef wrote: > The way I do this in Pure is to always call global functions in an > indirect fashion, using an internal global variable which holds the > current function pointer. When a function definition gets updated, the > Pure interpreter just jits the new function, changes the global variable > accordingly, and frees the old code. > > Compared to Duncan's

Conrado Miranda wrote: > To implement something that is common in Lisp. Suppose I have a program > that is running and can't be stopped or the cost being stoped is > prohibitive. If I find a better way to run an algorithm, I'd like to > update the running program non-stopping. The way I do this in Pure is to always call global functions in an indirect fashion, using an

Hi there. I've looking libcpu project and some history of the mailing list and got a question: what is the status of the disassembler? I mean, is there someone working on it, what targets does it support and so on. I mean, it would be interesting to be able to "undo" the operations LLVM does, like machine code->LLVM IR. If there's no one working with this right now, I'd

Hm, I wonder if the error message for llvm_unreachable should change. I think I remember a couple people focusing incorrectly on the UNREACHABLE instead of the actual error message above it (which means it's our fault, not theirs). Miranda, this is pointing at the same problem you had before. You have a function JIT-compiled, and you're trying to RAUW (ReplaceAllUsesWith) it. You'll

On Wed, Feb 17, 2010 at 6:29 AM, Conrado Miranda <miranda.conrado at gmail.com> wrote: > First, you have to call llvm-g++ to use the llvm-gcc front end, but it > doesn't matter here. I got the compile command from the Kaleidoscope documentation. > I'd like to suggest that you use pastebin to put your code and the send us > the link, so that we can download it. The

Lame3.88 has no reencoding. Because this, I used 3.86... but it needs to copy the libs manualy to the right places Why is the Lame/Ices/Icecast documentation so poor ??? Brendan Cully wrote: > On Tuesday, 26 June 2001 at 15:51, Darrell Berry wrote: > > nope, already done that, any other ideas? > > > > Denys Sene dos Santos wrote: > > > > > # rm

I'm running Ices 0.1.0, but the reencoding don't works with lame3.88. I prefer 3.88, it's more clean, but with the 3.86 that the reencoding works. About the documentation, I think that a Linux-Icecast-Stream-HOWTO is a good idea. My english is very poor, to compile the info. If anyone are interested... Brendan Cully wrote: > On Tuesday, 26 June 2001 at 11:02, Denys Sene dos

Deal R Users, I'm trying to find out how can I compute probabilities on a Bayesian Network using R. The Bayesian Network I modelled is shown at http://www.dsr.inpe.br/~mello/1727/BNgrapmodel.png and I'd like to know how can I proceed (commands on R) to answer questions like: (1) what is the probability of S=T given C=T, L=T, R=F, H=F and D=F; or (2) what is the probability of S=T

HI ! I?ve installed the latest R version (2.3.1) and I?ve had problems to save my graphics as JPEG, PNG and the others available formats. R saves the file with no extension. Then, I have to open this file using an image visualizer and save it as PNG, for instance. Previous R versions work without problems. Has everyone had a similar problem? Is it a bug of R 2.3.1? Thanks in advance. Ilka

Can somebody save-me? Thanks in advance! #R script: #trying to find out how solve a discrete Bayesian Belief Network. #option: using 'catnet' package #BEGIN library(catnet) cnet <- cnNew(nodes = c("a", "b", "c"), cats = list(c("1", "2"), c("1", "2"), c("1", "2")), parents = list(NULL, c(1), c(1,