similar to: results=hide?

Hi: I am using Sweave and texi2dvi to generate a LaTeX document but can't find the way to hide the graphics while the R chunks are being executed. I thought results=hide would do it but that't not the case. If I do: \begin{figure}[h] <<figA=true,echo=F,fig=T,results=hide>>= a < rnorm(1000) plot(a) @ \caption{Weekly estimates.} \label{figure:ggplot1} \end{figure} The

Dear all: Does anybody know about label conflicts between xtable and Hmisc? I found a couple of e-mails similar to this problem but is not clear to me how to get around the label problem. The first table(longtable below) is generated with the latex function from Hmisc but for some reason when I try to hyperlink to it,it takes me to the top of the document. The second table created with the xtable

Sorry, I forgot to include a reproducible example on my last e-mail but here it is: Since the file is large to be included here: The path to the foo.Rnw examples is: www.stat.umn.edu/~charlie/Sweave/foo.Rnw and is suppossed to produce a pdf like this one: http://www.stat.umn.edu/~charlie/Sweave/foo.pdf I have downloaded MiKTEX but I don't know how to make it work. Sweave and Stangle seem to

On Wed, Oct 16, 2019 at 12:19:02PM +0900, Tomasz Figa wrote: > On Wed, Oct 9, 2019 at 12:04 AM Daniel Vetter <daniel at ffwll.ch> wrote: > > > > On Tue, Oct 08, 2019 at 07:49:39PM +0900, Tomasz Figa wrote: > > > On Tue, Oct 8, 2019 at 7:03 PM Daniel Vetter <daniel at ffwll.ch> wrote: > > > > > > > > On Sat, Oct 05, 2019 at 02:41:54PM

Manuel: I changed your variable names from x to 'long' and y to 'lat' on the riqueza_out.csv file. The code below should do what you want. Also, since the legend title is kind of long, I broke it down into three lines so you can see more plot area. I am cc'ing the other groups so more people use it if needed. library(rgdal) library(ggplot2) library(sp) library(maptools)

Hi: Thanks to Dennis and Fernando for your help reordering the levels. Now I have a different issue: I am trying to get the?cumulative weekly values using cumsum and it appears to output the wrong?values. Here's my dataset: winter <-? structure(list(week = c(26L, 27L, 28L, 29L, 30L, 31L, 32L, 33L, 34L, 35L, 36L, 37L, 38L, 39L, 40L, 41L, 42L, 43L, 44L, 45L, 46L, 47L, 48L, 49L, 50L, 51L,

On Tue, Oct 08, 2019 at 07:49:39PM +0900, Tomasz Figa wrote: > On Tue, Oct 8, 2019 at 7:03 PM Daniel Vetter <daniel at ffwll.ch> wrote: > > > > On Sat, Oct 05, 2019 at 02:41:54PM +0900, Tomasz Figa wrote: > > > Hi Daniel, Gerd, > > > > > > On Tue, Sep 17, 2019 at 10:23 PM Daniel Vetter <daniel at ffwll.ch> wrote: > > > > > >

On 2020-08-19 13:49, Tomasz Figa wrote: > On Wed, Aug 19, 2020 at 1:51 PM Robin Murphy <robin.murphy at arm.com> wrote: >> >> Hi Tomasz, >> >> On 2020-08-19 12:16, Tomasz Figa wrote: >>> Hi Christoph, >>> >>> On Wed, Aug 19, 2020 at 8:56 AM Christoph Hellwig <hch at lst.de> wrote: >>>> >>>> The

On Wed, Aug 19, 2020 at 4:07 PM Robin Murphy <robin.murphy at arm.com> wrote: > > On 2020-08-19 13:49, Tomasz Figa wrote: > > On Wed, Aug 19, 2020 at 1:51 PM Robin Murphy <robin.murphy at arm.com> wrote: > >> > >> Hi Tomasz, > >> > >> On 2020-08-19 12:16, Tomasz Figa wrote: > >>> Hi Christoph, > >>> >

On Sat, Oct 05, 2019 at 02:41:54PM +0900, Tomasz Figa wrote: > Hi Daniel, Gerd, > > On Tue, Sep 17, 2019 at 10:23 PM Daniel Vetter <daniel at ffwll.ch> wrote: > > > > On Thu, Sep 12, 2019 at 06:41:21PM +0900, Tomasz Figa wrote: > > > This patch is an early RFC to judge the direction we are following in > > > our virtualization efforts in Chrome OS. The

On 12/01/2014 08:55 PM, George wrote: > Hi team! > > At work I have several small branch offices with ~5 PCs each. All PCs are > member of a Samba4 domain, whose DCs are on the headquarters (linked by > consumer grade VPNs) > > I want to ship "some small, cheap, reliable and magical device" to each > branch, in order to provide just 2 things: > * AD replication

Hi team! At work I have several small branch offices with ~5 PCs each. All PCs are member of a Samba4 domain, whose DCs are on the headquarters (linked by consumer grade VPNs) I want to ship "some small, cheap, reliable and magical device" to each branch, in order to provide just 2 things: * AD replication * File shares That't it, period. Nothing fancy. Suggestions??? What do you

 Hi, Consider the small dataset below, I want to subset by two variables in one line but it wont work...it works though if I subset separately. I have to be missing something obvious that I did not realize before while using subset.. fish <- structure(list(IDWeek = c(27L, 28L, 29L, 30L, 31L, 32L, 33L, 34L, 35L, 36L, 37L, 38L, 39L, 40L, 41L, 42L, 43L, 44L, 45L, 46L, 47L, 48L, 49L, 50L, 51L,

Hi all: I'm trying to create some side by side dynamic graphics on the same page but I am running into some problems. I am able to create side by side figures only if I import them into my PDF. see the example bellow: \documentclass[12pt]{article} \usepackage{color,cite,graphicx}% to put in axodraw \usepackage{latexsym,amssymb,epsf} \begin{document} %Import two figures side by side. Please

On Thu, Aug 20, 2020 at 6:45 AM Christoph Hellwig <hch at lst.de> wrote: > > On Wed, Aug 19, 2020 at 04:11:52PM +0200, Tomasz Figa wrote: > > > > By the way, as a videobuf2 reviewer, I'd appreciate being CC'd on any > > > > series related to the subsystem-facing DMA API changes, since > > > > videobuf2 is one of the biggest users of it. >

On Thu, Aug 20, 2020 at 12:24:31PM +0200, Tomasz Figa wrote: > > Of course this still uses the scatterlist structure with its annoying > > mix of input and output parametes, so I'd rather not expose it as > > an official API at the DMA layer. > > The problem with the above open coded approach is that it requires > explicit handling of the non-IOMMU and IOMMU cases

On Wed, Aug 19, 2020 at 01:16:51PM +0200, Tomasz Figa wrote: > Hi Christoph, > > On Wed, Aug 19, 2020 at 8:56 AM Christoph Hellwig <hch at lst.de> wrote: > > > > The V4L2-FLAG-MEMORY-NON-CONSISTENT flag is entirely unused, > > Could you explain what makes you think it's unused? It's a feature of > the UAPI generally supported by the videobuf2 framework

On Thu, Aug 20, 2020 at 6:54 PM Christoph Hellwig <hch at lst.de> wrote: > > On Thu, Aug 20, 2020 at 12:05:29PM +0200, Tomasz Figa wrote: > > The UAPI and V4L2/videobuf2 changes are in good shape and the only > > wrong part is the use of DMA API, which was based on an earlier email > > guidance anyway, and a change to the synchronization part . I find > >

On Wed, Aug 19, 2020 at 3:57 PM Christoph Hellwig <hch at lst.de> wrote: > > On Wed, Aug 19, 2020 at 02:49:01PM +0200, Tomasz Figa wrote: > > With the default config it doesn't, but with > > CONFIG_DMA_NONCOHERENT_CACHE_SYNC enabled it makes dma_pgprot() keep > > the pgprot value as is, without enforcing coherence attributes. > > Which isn't selected on

On Thu, Sep 12, 2019 at 06:41:21PM +0900, Tomasz Figa wrote: > This patch is an early RFC to judge the direction we are following in > our virtualization efforts in Chrome OS. The purpose is to start a > discussion on how to handle buffer sharing between multiple virtio > devices. > > On a side note, we are also working on a virtio video decoder interface > and