similar to: r-help

You need to do some extra work if you want to do classification with a regression method. One simple way to do classification with PLS is to code the classes as 0s and 1s (assuming there are only two classes) or -1s and 1s, fit the model, then threshold the prediction; e.g., those with predicted values < 0.5 (in the 0/1 coding) get labeled as 0s. There's a predict() method for mvr

Dear members, My name is Seungho Huh. I am a statistician who tries to use the Kernel PLS method in a classification problem. I am sending this email to ask you something about the "kernelpls" function in R (pls.pcr package). I would like to obtain the predicted Y values for test data, using the Kernel PLS method. Let's take the example in the R help: > data(NIR) >

Hello, I need to draw a partial dependence bar graph. My the my predictor vectors are continous and so is the response variable. Iam using the partialPlot function of the randomForest package. I get a line graph. How can I edit it to get a bar graph instead? (partialPlot(randomForest object ,data-matrix, number of predictor vectors, "Temp")) -- Daudi Jjingo [[alternative HTML

Dear list I am using the mvr function of the package pls.pcr to compute PLS resgression using a X matrix of gene expression variables and a Y matrix of medical varaibles. I would like to obtain the R2 (sum of squares captured by the model) and Q2 (proportion of total sum of squares captured in leave-one-out cross validation) of the model. I am not sure if there are specific slots in the

What version of R, what version of pls.pcr, and on what OS? Have you checked whether your versions of software are up to date? I get: > n <- 1350 > p <- 180 > y <- rnorm(n) > x <- matrix(sample(0:1, n*p, replace=TRUE), n, p) > fit <- mvr(x, y, method="SIMPLS", validat="none", ncomp=2) > xt <- matrix(sample(0:1, 312*p, replace=TRUE), 312,

Hi I'm performing a PLS This is my data present in a file Year Y X2 X3 X4 X5 X6 1960 27.8 397.5 42.2 50.7 78.3 65.8 1960 29.9 413.3 38.1 52 79.2 66.9 1961 29.8 439.2 40.3 54 79.2 67.8 1961 30.8 459.7 39.5 55.3 79.2 69.6 1962 31.2 492.9 37.3 54.7 77.4 68.7 My R-code Data <- read.csv("C:/TestData.csv") variable=names(Data)[4:8] dataset=NULL dataset$X=NULL len=length(variable)

All, I have been using a data set to build pls models for three different soil properties. Two of the three models run fine; however I receive the following error for the final model. > libs.IC.cal <- mvr(libs.IC.fmla, data = libsdata.cond.cal, ncomp=20,validation = "LOO", method = "oscorespls") Error in colMeans(x, n, prod(dn), na.rm) : 'x' must

How to use the segments in the PLS fit1 <- mvr(formula=Y~X1+X2+X3+X4+x5+....+x27, data=Dataset, comp=5,segment =7 ) here when i use segments,the error was like this rror in mvrCv(X, Y, ncomp, method = method, scale = sdscale, ...) : argument 7 matches multiple formal arguments Please help -- View this message in context:

Error in mvr(Kd_nM ~ qsar, ncomp = 6, data = my, validation = "CV", method = "kernelpls") :   Invalid number of components, ncomp How I can fix this? [[alternative HTML version deleted]]

Hello, I am having some trouble using a model I created from plsr (of train) to analyze each invididual R^2 of the 10 components against the test data. For example: mice1 <- plsr(response ~factors, ncomp=10 data=MiceTrain) R2(mice1) ##this provides the correct R2 for the Train data for 10 components ## Now my next objective is to calculate my model's R2 for each component on the

Dear List! I am trying to calculate the distance between original data points and their position in the PLS model. In order to do this, I tried to predict the scores using the predict.mvr function and calculate the corresponding positions in variable space. The prediction of scores works perfectly: ------ data(trees) # build model t<-plsr(Volume~.,data=trees) # predict scores for training

Hello all, I have generated a principal components regression model using the pcr() function from the PLS package (R version 2.12.0). I am getting a "non-conformable arguments" error when I try to use the predict() function on new data, but only when I try to read in the new data from a separate file. More specifically, when my data looks like this #########training data

Version 1.1-0 of the pls package is now available on CRAN. The pls package implements partial least squares regression (PLSR) and principal component regression (PCR). Features of the package include - Several plsr algorithms: orthogonal scores, kernel pls and simpls - Flexible cross-validation - A formula interface, with traditional methods like predict, coef, plot and summary - Functions

Version 1.1-0 of the pls package is now available on CRAN. The pls package implements partial least squares regression (PLSR) and principal component regression (PCR). Features of the package include - Several plsr algorithms: orthogonal scores, kernel pls and simpls - Flexible cross-validation - A formula interface, with traditional methods like predict, coef, plot and summary - Functions

I have switched from The Unscrambler to R for pls regression analysis and have been able to calculate scores, coefficients, RMSEP from a large number of PLS1 and PLS2 models. The ultimate goal is to use these models for predicting unknown samples, which again is straight-forward with the built-in predict() function. However, I?m struggling with prediction uncertainty (i.e. confidence intervals) on

Hello, I have a data set with 15 variables (first one is the response) and 1200 observations. Now I use pls package to do the plsr as below. trainSet = as.data.frame(scale(trainSet, center = T, scale = T)) trainSet.plsr = mvr(formula, ncomp = 14, data = trainSet, method = "kernelpls", model = TRUE, x = TRUE, y = TRUE) from the model, I wish to know the

Version 2.1-0 of the pls package is now available on CRAN. The pls package implements partial least squares regression (PLSR) and principal component regression (PCR). Features of the package include - Several plsr algorithms: orthogonal scores, kernel pls, wide kernel pls, and simpls - Flexible cross-validation - A formula interface, with traditional methods like predict, coef, plot and

Version 2.1-0 of the pls package is now available on CRAN. The pls package implements partial least squares regression (PLSR) and principal component regression (PCR). Features of the package include - Several plsr algorithms: orthogonal scores, kernel pls, wide kernel pls, and simpls - Flexible cross-validation - A formula interface, with traditional methods like predict, coef, plot and

Version 2.0-0 of the pls package is now available on CRAN. The pls package implements partial least squares regression (PLSR) and principal component regression (PCR). Features of the package include - Several plsr algorithms: orthogonal scores, kernel pls and simpls - Flexible cross-validation - A formula interface, with traditional methods like predict, coef, plot and summary - Functions

Version 2.0-0 of the pls package is now available on CRAN. The pls package implements partial least squares regression (PLSR) and principal component regression (PCR). Features of the package include - Several plsr algorithms: orthogonal scores, kernel pls and simpls - Flexible cross-validation - A formula interface, with traditional methods like predict, coef, plot and summary - Functions