similar to: Why double quote is preferred?

I'm doing a text mining project where I have to manually enter a double quote as an element inside a vector. I tried char[10]='"'#where i enclosed the double quote in a pair of single quotes. But the result is [1] "\"". Somehow a back slash is added automatically. I also tried to enclose the double quote in a pair of double quotes. That didn't work either.

Can anyone tell me how to get R to include a double quote in the middle of a character string? For example, the following code is close: > fnd<-"Open fnd 'test'" > cat(fnd) Open fnd 'test'> > But instead of Open fnd 'test' I need: Open fnd "test". Difference seems minor, but I am writing batch files for another

Dear all What is the preferred spreadsheet-like x-delimited data format for use with R? Should I prefer tab-, comma-, space- or some_other_delimitor-seprated data? I'm asking this because I've been once bitten by CSV data containing ` ' ' (apostrophe) symbols that R couldn't easily digest. Probably no the best approach, I've eventually inspected the document and removed

Attn: someone on R-core: "ran" should be "can". Also, thanks for this feature! Index: Quotes.Rd =================================================================== --- Quotes.Rd (revision 77845) +++ Quotes.Rd (working copy) @@ -74,7 +74,7 @@ Raw character constants are also available using a syntax similar to the one used in C++: \code{r"(...)"} with

Are IVR and "Auto Attendant" interchangeable terms? They both do the "Press 1 for" thing. Sales is asking me how to word it and I've always used both terms interchangeably.

https://bugzilla.mindrot.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3474 Bug ID: 3474 Summary: ssh_config can escape double quotes with a backslash Product: Portable OpenSSH Version: v9.0p1 Hardware: Other OS: Linux Status: NEW Severity: enhancement Priority: P5 Component: ssh Assignee:

S Programming by Venables and Ripley (2000) says on page 8, "R objects have another way to give information using the function \tttext{typeof}, which often gives the same information as \tttext{storage.mode}." It implies that there are some differences between typeof and storage.mode. However, according to ?typeof and ?storage.mode, it doesn't seem to be so. Could somebody let me

Hello everyone! I''ve noticed, that the book uses double quotes almost everywhere. It is like <%= javascript_include_tag "prototype" %> I''ve checked the "programming ruby, 2ed" book and found that double quotes are most suited when escape sequences and substitutions are required. Isn''t it more semantically correct to write this code like

Hi, I just upgraded by 1.0.x home server to 1.2.2. Overall the upgrade went fine, but a strange problem has cropped up with the CALLERID name value of incoming calls from the X101P card. When an incoming call is presented (via Vonage ATA), the calledid value getting double quotes up from: -- Executing NoOp("Zap/1-1", """WIRELESS CALLE" <1404xxxxxxx>") in

unsigned int and FLAC__uint32 are used interchangeably, leading to warnings with platforms (e.g. djgpp) where int32_t is long: bitreader.c: In function `FLAC__bitreader_read_rice_signed': bitreader.c:721: warning: passing arg 2 of `FLAC__bitreader_read_unary_unsigned' from incompatible pointer type bitreader.c: In function `FLAC__bitreader_read_rice_signed_block': bitreader.c:850:

On 1/14/17, Erik de Castro Lopo <mle+la at mega-nerd.com> wrote: > Ozkan Sezer wrote: > >> unsigned int and FLAC__uint32 are used interchangeably, leading to >> warnings with platforms (e.g. djgpp) where int32_t is long: > > Is `sizeof int == 4` though? Yes, obviously it is > I couldn't image FLAC working correctly > if it wasn't. > > Erik

I am writing a dialplan context under asterisk 11.21.0 to handle SIP message routing between registered SIP peers using chan_sip. I am having trouble with double-quotes when the source peer uses a display name, which appears in quotes before the SIP URI. I want to extract the SIP URI from MESSAGE(from) in order to (conditionally) route a failure message back to the source peer. My test dialplan

Question: I'm trying to put a double quote into the CDRUserField. What I end up with is a pair of double quotes. Example: exten => s,n,SetCDRUserField(data) exten => s,n,AppendCDRUserField(") exten => s,n,AppendCDRUserField(moredata) My record will look like this: data""moredata What I want is: data"moredata The wiki mentions using a backslash in order to

Hi, According to my understand of the description in R-intro, double quote and single quote are the same. Can somebody confirm if this is the case? Regards, Peng

Some webpage has described prcomp and princomp, but I am still not quite sure what the major difference between them is. Can they be used interchangeably? In help, it says 'princomp' only handles so-called R-mode PCA, that is feature extraction of variables. If a data matrix is supplied (possibly via a formula) it is required that there are at least as many units as

Dear all, I am confused about how to create an expression. I use a package (rsbml) which uses expressions and seems to make a difference if there is a quote around the expression or not. For example, package works with expressions such as > expression(A + B) but not with > expression("A + B") I now have a set of math expressions represented as strings, something like this: >

https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3298 Summary: --rsh option incorrectly interprets quotes Product: rsync Version: 2.6.6 Platform: x86 OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: core AssignedTo: wayned@samba.org ReportedBy: devin@freeshell.org

Hello everyone, I have tried several ways of doing this and searched the documentation and help lists and I have been unable to find an answer or even whether it is possible to do it. I am pasting together a formula and I need to insert double quotes around the strings. Here's an example: location <- c("AL", "AK", "MA", "PA") v=2 test <-

Does anyone know what the guidelines are supposed to be for properly initializing a pass? Looking around, we seem to have three styles of pass registration in use. INITIALIZE_PASS(...) INITIALIZE_PASS_BEGIN(...) INITIALIZE_PASS_DEPENDENCY(...) ... INITIALIZE_PASS_END(...) static RegisterPass<FooPass> X(...); (This is the one encouraged in the docs, but seemingly the least widely used

Hi again, I've not heard anything further regarding this bug, so I've had a look at the code. To restate the bug in a more precise way: LMTP in dovecot treats external RFC822 email addresses in the envelope recipient and internal usernames as almost identical/interchangeable. This is incorrect and leads to issues when attempting to use director as an LMTP proxy to proxy to recipients