similar to: problem in building an R package

Displaying 20 results from an estimated 8000 matches similar to: "problem in building an R package"

2008 Aug 07
1
package.skeleton does invalide regular name, bis... (PR#12020)
Hi the list, I guess I find an other bug (the first one is at the end off this mail) in package.skeleton. It occurs when we give as code_file some file that are not in the current directories. If we give a single file to code_file (like code_file=3D"riri/fifi.R"), it does not reconize fifi.R as a regular name and change it to riri/zfifi.R If we give several file to code_file (like
2008 Mar 30
1
package.skeleton.S4
Hi the devel list. I am adapting the package.skeleton to S4 classes and methods I would have been very proud to post a new working function on this list. Unfortunately, I do not manage to solve all the problems. Mainly - sys.source does not compile a file with setClass - dumpMethod does not exists yet In the following code, thise two problems are notified by a line ################# Still
2008 Jul 15
1
package.skeleton does invalide regular name...
Hi the list, I am using package.skeleton on a file that has a very classic name, but package.skeleton detect it as a invalid name : --- 8< ------- package.skeleton(name="packClassicBis",code_files="./packClassic/R/progClassic.R") Cr?ation des r?pertoires... Cr?ation de DESCRIPTION... Cr?ation de 'Read-and-delete-me'... Recopiage des fichiers de code... Cr?ation
2011 Jun 09
1
package.sk​eleton() does not create 'data' folder
Hi again, yesterday I mailed this query however I could not see this on the mail list. Therefore, I am reposting it again. I was using package.skeleton() function to create the skeleton of my package in windows. Here is my attempt: rm(list = ls()) setwd("F:/R_PackageBuild") package.skeleton("trial1", namespace = TRUE, code_files = "F:/R_PackageBuild/trial.r") In
2011 Dec 16
2
package.skeleton()
Hi-- I'm creating an R package, I've read through "Writing R Extensions" and the package.skeleton() R page-- and I'm still running into a little confusion. I would greatly appreciate any advice you can provide. Where do I run my following line of code from?: > package.skeleton(name = "a", code_files = "EsetObject.r" I'm currently running it from
2008 Apr 13
1
R 2.7 package.skeleton
Hi the devel list I am testing package.skeleton in R 2.7 (download today). I get an error that I do not understand. I guess it is not an error from my code since I have no probleme when I source it. So is it a error in package.skeleton? Here is my code : --- 8< ------ File essai.r ------------- setClass( Class="ClusterizLongData", representation=representation(
2011 Jun 09
1
Permission denied in Windows 7
I'm using package.skeleton() windows 7, 64 bit. When I try to specify the code_files package_skeleton(....code_files = " some directory") I get a warning that that the connection cannot be opened and I get a Permissions denied error. I'm running R as admin and I've given everybody full permissions on the folder. What am I missing [[alternative HTML version deleted]]
2009 Jan 30
2
error message with roxygen
Hello useRs, I'm trying to use the Roxygen package. Here my code file : #' A packge to check Roxygen's sanity #' @name helloRoxygen-package #' @docType package NA And my R code to generate the package : library(roxygen) package.skeleton("helloRoxygen", code_files = "roxy.r", force = T) roxygenize("helloRoxygen", "helloRoxygen",
2009 Oct 26
2
What is the most efficient practice to develop an R package?
I am reading Section 5 and 6 of http://cran.r-project.org/doc/contrib/Leisch-CreatingPackages.pdf It seems that I have to do the following two steps in order to make an R package. But when I am testing these package, these two steps will run many times, which may take a lot of time. So when I still develop the package, shall I always source('linmod.R') to test it. Once the code in
2009 Jul 09
1
Bug in package.skeleton, R 2.9.0?
Dear all, I am using package.skeleton to build a small packages of misc function for personal use. I have recently discovered that the option force=TRUE doesn't seem to do what is meant to do. Here's what I'm doing: > setwd("/Users/danielk/Documents/R/packages/dk") > files <- paste("codebase", dir("codebase", pattern=".R"),
2010 May 10
1
Rd files must have a non-empty \title
Hello everybody, I'm trying to install a package I have built. This package contains three scripts with various functions (S3 as well as S4 classes) I run at first the package.skeleton command with: > package.skeleton("affyAnalysis", namespace=TRUE, code_files =c("defS3.R", "defS4.R", "qc.R")) affyAnalysis is the name of the supposed package and
2013 Apr 14
1
Empty package skeleton
Hi, I know this has been reported/asked before ( http://tolstoy.newcastle.edu.au/R/e15/devel/11/10/0831.html) but it would still be just nice to have a fix for the not user-friendly fact that one cannot create a completely empty package skeleton (see previous post for a suggested patch). In the same vein, I would add to the original suggestion from Herve Pages that it would be nice to have a
2012 Apr 03
1
Package seems to be present but library don't find it
Hi, I try to make my first package? The HelloWorld.R file is: #### HelloWorld.R #### #' showHello est une fonction R permettant d'afficher le message #' "Hello World!" sur la console. #' @title la fonction showHello() showHello <-function(){ cat("Hello World!\n") } I use the following procedure to get the tar: # set the working directory where the file is
2020 Feb 18
2
Possible Regression in setClassUnion between 3.5.0 and 3.6.0
I am trying to create a class union of class unions to facilitate method dispatch. When I execute code in the global environment, everything acts as expected, however when I put the same code in the context of a package, selectMethod can no longer find the correct method. This first block below puts the code in the context of a package: fn <- "codefile.R" writeLines( c(
2012 Oct 13
0
installation of R (2.14.1 and 2.15.1) fails due to [reg-packages.Rout] Error
Hello, I'm trying to install R from sources on two Linux machines (both with Suse 12.2): 1. > uname -a Linux cs-wsok 3.4.6-2.10-desktop #1 SMP PREEMPT Thu Jul 26 09:36:26 UTC 2012 (641c197) x86_64 x86_64 x86_64 GNU/Linux 2. > uname -a Linux csltok.swansea.ac.uk 3.4.6-2.10-desktop #1 SMP PREEMPT Thu Jul 26 09:36:26 UTC 2012 (641c197) x86_64 x86_64 x86_64 GNU/Linux I am trying version
2011 Jun 08
0
package.skeleton() does not create 'data' folder
Hi again, I was using package.skeleton() function to create the skeleton of my package in windows. Here is my attempt: rm(list = ls()) setwd("F:/R_PackageBuild") package.skeleton("trial1", namespace = TRUE, code_files = "F:/R_PackageBuild/trial.r") In the trial.r file, there are 2 objects, one is a function and another is data. Here they are: fn1 <-
2013 Jun 04
0
bug in package.skeleton(), and doc typo.
Hi all, I think there's a bug in package.skeleton(), when using the environment argument: Example: env <- new.env() env$hello <- function() { print('hello') } package.skeleton(name='mypkg', environment=env) ==> does not create any source in mypkg/R/* By the way, package.skeleton(name='mypkg', environment=env, list="hello") does not work either.
2020 Feb 19
2
Possible Regression in setClassUnion between 3.5.0 and 3.6.0
Thanks, I'll look into it. On Tue, Feb 18, 2020 at 8:32 AM Ezra Tucker <ezztucker at gmail.com> wrote: > > Hi Robert, > > This looks like a bug to me (tested in R 3.6.2 on Windows), f(new("a")) > should return "hi!". I'll add that this DOES work properly in 3.6.1 > which leads me to suspect this could be due to the subtle change in the > way
2009 Nov 06
3
which data structure to choose to keep multile objects?
I have a function called nnmf which takes in one matrix and returns two matrices. for example, > X [,1] [,2] [,3] [,4] [1,] 1 4 7 10 [2,] 2 5 8 11 [3,] 3 6 9 12 > z=nnmf(X,2) > z$W [,1] [,2] [1,] 0.8645422 0.6643681 [2,] 1.7411863 0.5377504 [3,] 2.6179287 0.4111063 > z$H [,1] [,2] [,3] [,4] [1,] 1.14299486
2020 Feb 26
1
Possible Regression in setClassUnion between 3.5.0 and 3.6.0
Okay - that makes sense and thanks for looking into this! As an aside, from R-devel's perspective would you say methods are stabilizing again or do you foresee a lot of changes coming in the 4.* series? On Tue, Feb 25, 2020 at 3:39 PM Michael Lawrence via R-devel < r-devel at r-project.org> wrote: > This seems to work as expected (returning "hi!") in R-devel, but there