similar to: General means of matching a color specification to an official R color name

I can never remember how to use "order" to sort the rows of a data frame, so like any good, lazy programmer, I decided to write my own function. The idea is to specify a data.frame and a one-sided formula with +/- indicating ascending/descending. For example: sort.data.frame(~ +nitro -Variety, Oats) Since sorting of a data.frame is an oft-asked question on this list, I am posting

Dear R-Group, I have a function that sorts a data frame and oneo of the lines in the function is: vars <- unlist(strsplit(formc, "[\\+\\-]")) The function works fine and the above line is always reached. However, when I include the function in a package and run "R CMD check pkgname" it gives this error message: '\+' is an unrecognized escape in character

hello, I'd like know how to sort a data frame in R for example how I should do to sort by Catholic with swiss data frame like below thanks Fertility Agriculture Examination Education Catholic Infant.Mortality Courtelary 80.2 17.0 15 12 9.96 22.2 Delemont 83.1 45.1 6 9 84.84 22.2

Hello all, Been having an issue today that I can't seem to solve, so reaching out to others much more knowledgeable for help/advice/assistance. I ran the software update this morning and installed 134 packages, clamd was one of the packages. Upon completion of the update, I needed to reboot the box. During bootup I got the following issue: Starting Clam AntiVirus Daemon: WARNING: Ignoring

I fixed the country code issue but that did not resolve the problem. I also removed all files in /var/lib/clamav and reran freshclam (without rebooting), that also did not fix the problem. Jay > Am 15.07.2018 um 00:13 schrieb Jay Hart: >> ClamAV update process started at Sat Jul 14 15:10:48 2018 >> Using IPv6 aware code >> Querying current.cvd.clamav.net >> TTL: 1232

I'm trying to write a loop for a series of nested functions. and I get an incompatible types error when trying to run it. It's supposed to be a simulation (1000 iterations) with a random value for "rand" being chosen each time. After each rand value is chosen, the rest of the functions are evaluated with this given rand value and their "Fitness" sum value is saved and

*Synopsis*: "set once" / "create time only" properties can''t be set for pool level dataset Due to a change requested by <User 1-5Q-12446>, <User 1-5Q-12446> is now the responsible engineer for: CR 6647661 changed on Jan 7 2008 by <User 1-5Q-12446> === Field ============ === New Value ============= === Old Value ============= Responsible Engineer

*Synopsis*: "set once" / "create time only" properties can''t be set for pool level dataset CR 6647661 changed on Apr 15 2009 by <User 1-ERV-6> === Field ============ === New Value ============= === Old Value ============= See Also 6828754 ====================== ===========================

I have a Master's student working on a project which involves estimating parameters of a certain model via maximum likelihood, with the maximization being done via optim(). A phenomenon has occurred which I am at a loss to explain. If we use certain pairs of starting values for optim(), it simply returns those values as the ``optimal'' values, although they are definitely not

I am running into problems calling the library function nlme from within another function. Basically,the following function (with v a list containing data and initialization values) > testfunc function(dat=v) { test<-nlsList(result~a+(b-a)/(1+(conc/(c+z*cdiff))^d) |rep,start=dat$init,data=dat$mixeddat) return(nlme(test,random=b~1)) } produces the error message Error in eval(expr, envir,

I have a need to call and pass arguments to nlme() from within another function. I use R version 1.8. I have found an apparent way to make this work, but I would appreciate some comments on whether this fix is really appropriate, or there is another way to do it that does not involve changing the source code. I don't have enough experience to start changing the sorurce code of a library

Address some credit2 issues. This patch series, along with the recent changes to the cpupools interface, should address some of the strange credit2 instability. _______________________________________________ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@lists.xensource.com http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel

Good morning puppets, as stated for reallife, "one always meets more than one time", this is true for puppet and me: Although I''m migrating away from puppet [0] to cdist [1], a customer requests a new puppet installation. This brings me again to the question on how to bootstrap a new puppet infrastructure, which we did with a shell script or a Debian package and then running

Am 15.07.2018 um 00:13 schrieb Jay Hart: > ClamAV update process started at Sat Jul 14 15:10:48 2018 > Using IPv6 aware code > Querying current.cvd.clamav.net > TTL: 1232 > Software version from DNS: 0.100.1 > WARNING: Your ClamAV installation is OUTDATED! > WARNING: Local version: 0.100.0 Recommended version: 0.100.1 > DON'T PANIC!

Libraries: do they look ok???? [root at centos clamav]# ldd $(which freshclam) linux-gate.so.1 => (0x00529000) libclamav.so.7 => /usr/lib/libclamav.so.7 (0x00bc5000) libxml2.so.2 => /usr/lib/libxml2.so.2 (0x00124000) libbz2.so.1 => /lib/libbz2.so.1 (0x04906000) libssl.so.10 => /usr/lib/libssl.so.10 (0x047fa000) libcrypto.so.10 => /usr/lib/libcrypto.so.10 (0x03d52000)

Chris Lattner wrote: > One way to do this is to add a "cut down" version of the app to the > test suite. I disabled optional features in clamav-config.h > >> 2. GPL license. Chris? > > Any open source license that allows unrestricted redistribution is > fine in llvm-test Ok, I have created a script that automatically checks out ClamAV 0.92-stable source code

I hope that the mailing list is the correct forum for the question below. I have trouble calling functions nlsList and nlme from another function. Any help would be greatly appreciated. Jens Praestgaard Human Genome Sciences Rockville MD. I have a data set v with two components, v$mixeddat and v$init. They are listed below: > v$mixeddat conc result rep sample z 11 20.00000000

On Mon, 17 Dec 2007, Evan Cheng wrote: > We always welcome more tests. But it looks like there are two issues > here. > > 1. The autoconf requirement. Is it possible to get one configuration > working without the need for autoconf? One way to do this is to add a "cut down" version of the app to the test suite. > 2. GPL license. Chris? Any open source license that

Hi list, I have installed ClamAV from rpmforge and followed the excellent CentOS how to on installing amavisd - all has appeared to just work as advertised - thanks to all those involved in getting these instructions together. Come time to upgrade to 5.3 and ClamAV 0.95 (logwatch has been encouraging me to do the ClamAV upgrade for a week or two) All appeared to work fine. However I now notice

Hey all - The trunk currently supports three types of mocking/stubbing: Mock Objects (created dynamically at runtime) Partial Mocking of methods on existing classes Stubbing of methods on existing objects or classes The main difference between Partial Mocking and Stubbing is that Stubs don''t verify. I''m wondering if we really need the stubbing facility at all, given that we